Case law

Philadelphia's Appeal

117 Pa. Super. 132 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1934

As it does not appear in the case stated we cannot assume it: School Dist. of Sharon v. Boyle Est., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 416 , 174 A. 915 ; Richardson v. First Brethren Church, 314 Pa. 423 , 171 A. 897 . 4. … Co. v. Tamaqua Boro.

Laymon v. Herwick

122 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1936

As is said in Robson v. … The fact that the injury occurred before the steam shovel reached the job does not prevent a recovery, and it is so decided in Lobos v. Union Paving Co., 298 Pa. 381 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Fletcher v. Cavell

207 Pa. Super. 17 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1965

Ross v. Botula, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 ; 211 A. 2d 12 (1965), it will be necessary for the lower court to ascertain the circumstances under which this written waiver was obtained. … Brown v. Cavell, 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 11 , 211 A. 2d 22 (1965).

Agostin v. Pittsburgh Steel Foundry Corp.

157 Pa. Super. 322 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1945

Upon it the board made an award which was affirmed by the lower court. The Commonwealth, through its insurance board, has not joined in this appeal of the defendant employer from that judgment. … McIntyre v. Lavino & Co., supra; Silva v. Erie Forge Co., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 251 , 27 A. 2d 727 .

Jacobs v. Chatwani

2007 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2007

Milicic v. … Boucher v.

Commonwealth v. Krick

164 Pa. Super. 516 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1949

Defendant went to board at the Wagner home in October, 1946. … Prior to the complaint, on May 17, 1947 Krick left the Wagner home and went to a boarding house in Yeagertown. Two days later Mrs. Wagner left home and took a room at the same boarding house.

Allentown's Appeals

147 Pa. Super. 385 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1941

Cumberland Coal Co. v. Board of Revision, Etc., 284 U. S. 23 . In the present act, the emphasis is upon equalization of assessments to conform with our State Constitution, Art. IX, §1. … Co. v. County Com’rs, 241 Pa. 339 , 88 A. 496 .

Sokol v. Sokol

205 Pa. Super. 459 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1965

See Bruno v. Bruno, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 219 , 138 A. 2d 301 ; Red-dick v. Reddick, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 257 , 166 A. 2d 553 ; Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. *464 26, 180 A. 2d 97 . … The denial of a divorce from bed and board is not a bar to a subsequent action by tbe wife for support: Commonwealth ex rel. Reddick v. Reddick, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 111 , 181 A. 2d 896 .

Lorah v. Amity Township

35 Pa. Super. 529 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1908

A municipality is not responsible for a mistake of judgment even, made by a public officer in the discharge of his duty if such mistake be an honest one: Collins v. Philadelphia, 93 Pa. 272 ; Bear v. … Martin v. Riddle, 26 Pa. 415 . The nonsuit was rightly granted. The judgment is affirmed.

Boylan v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

92 Pa. Super. 562 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1927

The Referee and Compensation Board and the lower court allowed compensation. … Miller v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 51 ; Hughes v. American Int. Ship Bldg. Co., 270 Pa. 27 . The Referee found that the delay was due to a mistake of fact.

Howey v. Peppard Bros.

108 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1932

In the very recent ease of Lacey v. … We may add that the lower court apparently not satisfied with the facts as found by the board made a number of findings. It is not within the province of the court to do this: Morell v. B. & S. C. & C. Co., 103 Pa.

Adams v. W. J. Rainey, Inc.

133 Pa. Super. 538 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1938

In the McFadden case, Parker, J., speaking for this court, considered at length the whole question of “overexertion” and reviewed the cases chiefly relied upon by the board and court below. Keck v. John Mullen Const. … The board cited and relied upon Watkins v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 278 Pa. 463 , 123 A. 461 , and Durga v. Williams et al., 89 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , as supporting its affirmance of the referee’s award.

Com. v. Colon, L

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2014

Officer Brown asked Ms. Santiago what happened, to which she immediately responded that Appellant had struck her and punched her. Id. at 11. Officer Brown additionally testified that Ms. … documentary evidence; (d) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); body such as a traditional parole board

Parkins v. Hillman C. & C. Co.

114 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1934

The duty of the referee and the board was to determine whether under all the evidence the claimant met his death “in the commission of an act in direct violation of the law”: Gima v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. … Superior Ct. 288 , 161 A. 903 ; Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 290 Pa. 480 , 139 A. 192 .

Commonwealth v. Burton

164 Pa. Super. 158 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1948

Commonwealth v. Kazman, supra; Commonwealth v. Middleton, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 573 , 4 A. 2d 533 . … Commonwealth v. Parker et al., 294 Pa. 144 , 143 A. 904 .

Dandridge v. Exhibitors Service Co.

167 Pa. Super. 143 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

He is the pastor of Brown Chapel A. M. E. Church on the North Side of the City. Seated beside him was a young woman, a member of his congregation. … Philadelphia Transportation Co., supra; Brown v. McNamara, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 206, 207 , 50 A. 2d 748 .

Commonwealth v. Lechner

454 Pa. Super. 456 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1996

Commonwealth v. … In Alabama v.

Commonwealth v. Brandt

244 Pa. Super. 154 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1976

During their inventory the police found a brown paper bag under the front seat and, upon opening the bag, discovered a plastic bag of suspected marijuana. 2 Relying on our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … The brown paper bag may have been in plain view, but not the marijuana. The contraband was not in plain view.” .

Monson Estate

160 Pa. Super. 631 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1947

Justice Simpson stated at page 291: “We said in Carpenter v. … A witness for the claimant testified that the usual charge for board in that vicinity is $10 a week, but board in common parlance includes the furnishing of food, and we cannot assume that the claimant furnished it.

Russell v. Ralston

133 Pa. Super. 465 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1938

That provision of the statute is mandatory: Mulligan v. E. Keeler Co., 112 Pa. Superior Ct. 261, 265 , 170 A. 311 . … L. 1571), he is entitled to have his claim disposed of upon its merits: Kuca v. Lehigh, Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163 , 110 A. 731; and DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Co. et al., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 497 .