Case law

Commonwealth v. JONES

213 Pa. Super. 504 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1968

Bubba returned the dice boards. The testimony of Barr was corroborated by Mrs. … Commonwealth v. Pressel, 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 367 , 168 A. 2d 779 (1961), Commonwealth v. Finkelstein, 191 Pa. Superior Ct. 328 , 156 A. 2d 888 (1959).

Berner v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

100 Pa. Super. 324 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1930

From this award of further compensation the employer appealed to the board; upon a review of the evidence, the board concluded the law had not been properly applied by the referee to the facts thereby disclosed and sustained … Superior Ct. 463 , Kovach v. Union Drawn Steel Co. et al., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 302 , and kindred cases, are not applicable to this case.

Myers v. Maurer & Myers

144 Pa. Super. 385 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1941

The referee who heard the case awarded compensation and subsequently the board affirmed the referee. … S. 2748” appeared on V.. Roger ¿Myers’ truck. Exceptions were filed by the appellants to the board’s findings and these exceptions were dismissed by Krei-sher, P. J. This appeal followed.

Laymon v. Herwick

122 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1936

As is said in Robson v. … The fact that the injury occurred before the steam shovel reached the job does not prevent a recovery, and it is so decided in Lobos v. Union Paving Co., 298 Pa. 381 .

Strouse v. Quaker Knitting Mills, Inc.

159 Pa. Super. 39 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1946

Claimant again appealed to the board, which made its own findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award of compensation effective as of April 4, 1939. … But since claimant’s substantive right of action was in existence at the time the Act of 1939 became effective, a reasonable time must be allowed to enforce this right: Ferki v. Frantz’s Transfer Co., supra; Kennedy v.

Flood Appeal

178 Pa. Super. 75 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1955

Flood and James Lenahan Brown are attorneys who represented three taxpayers in an appeal from the Auditor’s Report of the Borough of Exeter for the year 1946. … However, in the leading case of Hempstead v. Meadville Theological School, 286 Pa. 493 , 134 A. 103 , Mr.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Webb v. Cain, Warden

158 Pa. Super. 222 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1945

Stanton v. Francies, 250 Pa. 350 ; Com. ex rel. Guiramez v. Ashe, *Page 224 293 Pa. 18 ; Com. v. Arbach, 113 Pa. Super. 137 ; Com. ex rel. Mingin v. … Carmelo v. Smith, 347 Pa. 495 , 496 ; Com. ex rel. Reps v.

Jacobs v. Chatwani

2007 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 2007

Milicic v. … Boucher v.

Commonwealth v. Wyoda

44 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1910

The question raised by this specification of error has been considered by this court in Commonwealth v. Shaleen, 30 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 ; by the Supreme Court of this state in Commonwealth v. … him to testify as to the differences between the certificate in question and the signatures thereto and the genuine certificates issued by the board.

Skuaskai v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

104 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 9, 1931

In Houlehan v. … Morucci v. Susquehanna Collieries, 297 Pa. 508 ; Leacock v. Susquehanna Collieries, 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 581 .

Versellesi v. Elizabeth Township

136 Pa. Super. 362 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1939

See Sonnett v. Stowe Township, 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 397 . In Sames v. Borough of Perkasie et al., 100 Pa. … In Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Borough of Latrobe, 131 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Stofchek

118 Pa. Super. 412 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1935

White v. Miller, 313 Pa. 140 , 169 A. 436 ; Mallinger v. Pgh., 316 Pa. 257 , 175 A. 525 . … The learned court below relied largely on Guppy v. Moltrup, 281 Pa. 343 , 126 A. 766 , and Com. v. Barbono, 56 Pa. Superior Ct. 637 .

Boylan v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

92 Pa. Super. 562 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1927

The Referee and Compensation Board and the lower court allowed compensation. … Miller v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 51 ; Hughes v. American Int. Ship Bldg. Co., 270 Pa. 27 . The Referee found that the delay was due to a mistake of fact.

Nicholson v. Combs

437 Pa. Super. 334 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1995

Knorr, 527 Pa. 83, 86-87, 588 A.2d 503, 505 (1991), where our Supreme Court stated: Parties to a divorce action may bargain between themselves and structure their agreement as best serves their interests, Brown v. … Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495 , 457 A.2d 1291 (1983) (an agreement for child support may not be reduced by the court, although an Order to increase support is *342 permissible when circumstances warrant) and Brown v.

Commonwealth v. Brandt

244 Pa. Super. 154 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1976

During their inventory the police found a brown paper bag under the front seat and, upon opening the bag, discovered a plastic bag of suspected marijuana. 2 Relying on our Supreme Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. … The brown paper bag may have been in plain view, but not the marijuana. The contraband was not in plain view.” .

Don v. J. S. Ivins Sons, Inc.

90 Pa. Super. 105 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1926

Co., 239 Pa. 110 ; Helfrich v. Gurnari, 78 Pa. Superior Ct. 449 . … Laird, a young boy, who testified, in substance, that he jumped on the running board of the truck, which then started.

Dennis v. Jarka Corp.

182 Pa. Super. 498 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1956

Adamchick v. Wyoming Valley Collieries Co., 332 Pa. 401, 410 , 3 A. 2d 377 (1938). In Harring v. … An award was made to the widow by the referee and the board, and was affirmed by the lower court.

Badolato v. Berwick Borough

135 Pa. Super. 416 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1939

In the case of Sames v. Borough of Perkasie et al., 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 402, 406 , cited by the board and the court below, Mr. … That the Act of Assembly should be liberally construed, was indicated by this court in the case of Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. v. Latrobe Borough, 131 Pa.

Sharp, C. v. McQuiller, S.

206 A.3d 1179 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 2019

Pers. v. … See Wilk v.

Parkins v. Hillman C. & C. Co.

114 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1934

The duty of the referee and the board was to determine whether under all the evidence the claimant met his death “in the commission of an act in direct violation of the law”: Gima v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. … Superior Ct. 288 , 161 A. 903 ; Shoffler v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 290 Pa. 480 , 139 A. 192 .