Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

2.44s

  • Sparkes v. Wright

    377 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1988

    Neshaminy Constructors v. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Bldg, and Construction Trades Council, 303 Pa.Super. 420 , 449 A.2d 1389 (1982). … In construing a statute, the Superior Court must do *381 so in a way which will give effect to all its provisions. 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1921(a); Cervato v. Holy Redeemer Hospital, 342 Pa.Super. 551 , 493 A.2d 728 (1985).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Leaman

    255 Pa. Super. 481 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1978

    Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, 248 Pa.Super. at 294 n. 5, 375 A.2d *497 at 104-05 n. 5. … Commonwealth v. Schroth, supra, and Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, may be read to mandate such a procedure.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bucci Et Ux. v. Lincoln Coal Co.

    140 Pa. Super. 538 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1940

    Although we might have found otherwise than did the board, our function is not finding facts. … Superior Ct. 358 , 174 A. 784 ; Marinho v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 279 , 175 A. 715 ; Haywood v. Henrietta Coal Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 371 , 180 A. 34 ; Serafini v. West End Coal Co., 131 Pa.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Gibson

    67 Pa. Super. 373 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1917

    The plaintiff’s statement in the action of Gibson v. … That a part of the claim of Gibson v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hadfield v. American Society of Composers, Authors & Publishers

    174 Pa. Super. 394 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1953

    Darmopray v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 200 , 82 A. 2d 341 ; Halloway v. Carnegie Illinois Steel Corp., 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 137 , 96 A. 2d 171 . … In Butrin et al. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Shearer's License

    26 Pa. Super. 34 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 28, 1904

    evidence given on the hearing or its own knowledge it determined that the applicant was not a fit person, or that his house was not necessary for the accommodatión of the public: Kelminski’s License, 164 Pa. 231 ; Commonwealth v. … Superior Ct. 566 , and cases there cited; Brown’s License, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. *36 409 ; Chambers’s License, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 412 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Beaver Township School District v. Burdick

    51 Pa. Super. 496 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1912

    This is the point upon which Kirk v. … This conclusion is supported by Kirk v. King, 3 Pa. 436 . And, although it was said in Miller v. Porter, 53 Pa. 292 , that Kirk v. King was practically overruled in Wright v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Tarabilda

    222 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1972

    to which such officers, boards, and commissions must strictly adhere. … Superior Ct. 313 , 144 A. 2d 623 (1958); Commonwealth v. Harrison, 183 Pa. Superior Ct. 133 , 130 A. 2d 198 (1957); and Commonwealth v. Paschall, 46 Pa. D. & C. 243 (1942); cf. Holgate Bros. Co. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Monson Estate

    160 Pa. Super. 631 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1947

    Justice Simpson stated at page 291: “We said in Carpenter v. … A witness for the claimant testified that the usual charge for board in that vicinity is $10 a week, but board in common parlance includes the furnishing of food, and we cannot assume that the claimant furnished it.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pildish v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.

    61 Pa. Super. 195 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1915

    The case of Paterson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 218 Pa. 359 , cited by appellant, as was pointed out by Brother Orlady in Renney v. Street Ry. Co., supra, does not change the rule. … The case of Burns v. Johnstown Ry. Co., 213 Pa. 143 , differs from this.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Defender Ass'n of Philadelphia Amendments of Articles of Inc.

    219 Pa. Super. 309 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1971

    When Gideon v. … Maroney, supra; Commonwealth v. Wilson, supra.

    Cited 1 timesPublishedText from a scan
  • Commonwealth v. Stoutzenberger

    235 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1975

    See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U. S. 590 , 17 Cr. L. 3145 (1975); Commonwealth ex rel. Butler v. Rundle, 429 Pa. 141 , 239 A.2d 426 (1968). … Brown v. Illinois, supra; Commonwealth v. Jackson, supra. Hence, the statements must be suppressed as well. 4 *506 Finally, we must determine whether the identification made by Mr.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Max Wool v. Keller B. L. Assn.

    106 Pa. Super. 492 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1932

    The cases on which appellant’s counsel relies have been modified by the recent decisions of the Supreme Court in Brown v. Victor B. Assn., 302 Pa. 254 , 153 Atl. 349 , and Stone v. Schiller B. & L. … Assn., 302 Pa. 544 , 153 Atl. 758 , which were followed by this court in Weil v. Steiner B. & L. Assn., 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , and Stern v. Ashbourne B. & L. Assn., 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 561 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Booth v. Freer

    133 Pa. Super. 594 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1938

    That has been the consistent construction given to section 104, supra: See Tarr v. Hecla Coal & Coke Co., 265 Pa. 519 , 109 A. 224 ; Blake v. Wilson, 268 Pa. 469 , 112 A. 126 ; Sgattone v. … The appellant relies mainly upon Marsh v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • First Nationnal Bank v. Cumbler

    145 Pa. Super. 595 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1941

    Bk., to use, v. Harvey, Exrx., supra, and Bernatovich v. Davis, 342 Pa. 86 , 19 A. 2d 925 . … The Supreme Court has held, however, in Bailey v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Russell v. Henry C. Patterson Co.

    48 Pa. Super. 571 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1912

    In Laird v. Campbell, 92 Pa. 470 , Mr. … The like doctrine is enunciated in Berger’s Appeal, 96 Pa. 443 , and in Sherman v. Herr, 220 Pa. 420 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Remick v. Remick

    310 Pa. Super. 23 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 28, 1983

    Rubin v. Rubin, 230 Pa.Superior Ct. 591, 326 A.2d 578 (1974) as authority. The Rubin case involved an action in divorce a m.e.t. (a mensa et thoro), that is, from bed and board, essentially a legal separation. … Rubin v. Rubin, supra. However, the Rubin case involved a divorce from bed and board with an accompanying award of permanent alimony; 9 at issue in Thoma was an order for alimony pendente lite.

    Cited 68 timesPublished
  • Turek v. Damalak

    161 Pa. Super. 84 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1947

    Opinion by Hirt, J., The lower court entered judgment on an award of compensation made by the referee and affirmed by the board. … Adamchick v. Wyoming Val. Col. Co., 332 Pa. 401 , 3 A. 2d 377 ; Paydo v. Union Collieries Co., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 385 , 22 A. 2d 759 . We have collected and discussed some of the authorities in Garver v. B. K.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Anchor Building & Loan Ass'n

    20 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1902

    The action taken by the board in maturing the several series was, as found by the auditor, after reports by duly appointed committees of the board upon the financial condition of the association, and with the advice of counsel … for the unfortunate results of their management, since they are held to but ordinary skill and diligence and are personally liable only when they are guilty of fraudulent conduct or of acts clearly ultra vires : Swentzel v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Shields v. William Freihofer Baking Co.

    147 Pa. Super. 455 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1941

    Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 146 Pa. … (McColligan v. Penna. R. R.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.