Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.68s

  • Commonwealth v. Grant

    121 Pa. Super. 399 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1935

    Com. v. Kosh, 305 Pa. 146, 158 , 157 A. 479, 483 . See Com. v. Filer, 249 Pa. 171, 178 , 94 A. 822, 824 ; Com. v. Deutsch, 72 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 ; Com. v. Grotefend and Haun, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 7 ; Blassotti v. … the Chairman of the Board of Directors for approval by the Board; loans of $10,000 and over, secured and unsecured must be approved at a regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors.”

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Taylor

    2007 Pa. Super. 282 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 7, 2007

    Chappel’s apartment with Love and Brown, exited the building and *1037 indicated to [A]ppellant and Pinkney that he wanted to rob someone inside the building. … As Brown and Love were exiting the building, [A]ppellant and Pinkney grabbed Love and held him while Martin shot him in the chest, killing him.

    Cited 244 timesPublished
  • Tsatiris v. Salkind Painting Co.

    177 Pa. Super. 421 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

    tion, the defendant must show that claimant committed a felony, and cites Curran v. Vang Construction Co., 286 Pa. 245 , 133 A. 261 ; Haas v. Brotherhood of Transportation Workers, 158 Pa. … Superior Ct. 291 , 44 A. 2d 776 ; Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 , 123 A. 766 , and other similar cases.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Geytko v. Pittsburgh & Eastern Coal Co.

    88 Pa. Super. 522 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1926

    The claim made under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by his surviving wife, with the award by the referee in her favor, was sustained by the compensation board and the court below. … The compensation board was clearly right in allowing the widow compensation. The judgment is affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. One 1946 Chrysler Sedan

    162 Pa. Super. 179 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1947

    In Commonwealth v. Reo Speed Wagon, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 38 , a similar contention was raised in a forfeiture proceeding instituted under the Act of March 27, 1923, P. … Appellant argues that certain departmental regulations of the Liquor Control Board are invalid. This is not assigned as error and is not properly before this Court.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • McClymont v. Gitt

    90 Pa. Super. 395 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1927

    L. 933, establishes a State board of examiners of architects. … Sherman v. Welsh, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 282 , is the latest case in our court upon the subject.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Zankowski

    377 Pa. Super. 256 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1988

    Commonwealth v. Jackson, 506 Pa. 469 , 485 A.2d 1102 (1984); Commonwealth v. Brown, 336 Pa.Super. 628 , 486 A.2d 441 (1984). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, supra. It is within the sole province of the trier of fact sitting without a jury to pass upon the credibility of witnesses.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Raiskin Unemployment Compensation Case

    186 Pa. Super. 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1958

    The only question presented to v. is whether she is barred from receiving unemployment compensation because of a refusal to accept suitable work. … Decision of the Board is affirmed.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Martin

    416 Pa. Super. 507 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1992

    Commonwealth v. Brown, 400 Pa.Super. 316 , 583 A.2d 805 (1990). … Brown , 400 Pa.Superior Ct. at 331, 583 A.2d at 812-813 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Atkins v. URBAN REDEVELOPMENT AUTH., ETC.

    263 Pa. Super. 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 24, 1979

    In Burke et ux v. … March 16, 1971 the property was boarded up and shut down. August 11, 1971 the property was cleaned up and boarded up. September 7, 1972 the property was shut down and boarded up.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Koolish v. Koolish

    214 Pa. Super. 304 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1969

    See, e.g., Harding v. Harding, supra; Foster v. Foster, 70 Pa. D. & C. 485 (C.P. Beaver 1949); Crawford v. Crawford, 47 Pa. County Ct. 56 (C.P. West. 1915) ; Downs v. Downs, No. 6150 Sept. Term, 1954 (C.P. No. 5 Phila. … A divorce from bed and board is, among other things, an adjudication that the wife can live apart from her husband without being guilty of desertion. See Rutherford v. Rutherford, 152 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Smith

    218 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1971

    Appellant directed him to another man who handed him a third brown bag. … Commonwealth v. Zimmerman, 214 Pa.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Trippett

    2007 Pa. Super. 260 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 2007

    The Honorable Joan Brown denied the motion on October 7, 2004; however, Judge Brown granted Trippett release on nominal bail under Rule 600(e). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 721 A.2d 1105, 1106 (Pa.Super.1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 163 timesPublished
  • Louden v. Apollo Gas Co.

    273 Pa. Super. 549 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 1980

    General Press, 463 Pa. 292 at 297 , 344 A.2d 837 at 840 (1975); Lanning Will, 414 Pa. 313, 316 , 200 A.2d 392, 393 (1964); Sterrett v. Sterrett, 401 Pa. 583 , 166 A.2d 1 (1960); Brown v. … Shapiro v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cairgle v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.

    166 Pa. Super. 621 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

    cannot be reversed: Kline v. … The board’s consideration, was as though the amendment had been allowed.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Byerly v. Pawnee C. Co.

    105 Pa. Super. 506 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1932

    The referee and board found as a fact that the claimant is not totally, but only partially, disabled, and terminated the agreements. … Justice Kephart, in Woodward *509 v. Pittsburgh Eng. & Const. Co., 293 Pa. 338 , states that disability contemplated by our law is the loss of earning power as the result of the injury. See also Bausch v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bauman v. Spokas

    146 Pa. Super. 530 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1941

    Thereupon, the claimant appealed to the board upon the ground that the referee had erred in failing to award any compensation for the injuries to his first and fourth fingers. The board, citing Lente v. … Luci, 275 Pa. 217 , 119 A. 132 ; Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Company, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 531 ; and Olinski v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 93 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    219 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 22, 1971

    American Express v. United States Horseshoe Company, 244 U.S. 58 (1917). In Cray v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, 177 Pa. … See, also, Galveston, Harrisburg and San Antonio Railway Co. v. Woodbury, 254 U.S. 357 (1920); Rau v. Wilkes-Barre and Eastern Railroad Company, 311 Pa. 510, 513 , 167 Atl. 230 (1933); Jackson and Perkins Company v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Kazman

    92 Pa. Super. 175 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1927

    A second indictment charged the defendant and others, acting as an election board at the said primary election, with certifying a return of said election as correct when they knew that the same was not true. … It is true that no witness was called to prove that these documents were actually signed by him, but as was held in Commonwealth v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Grady

    309 Pa. Super. 187 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1982

    In Commonwealth v. Brown, 455 Pa. 274 , 314 A.2d 506, 508 (1974), the Supreme Court, citing its decisions in Commonwealth v. Silverman, 442 Pa. 211 , 275 A.2d 308 (1971), and Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.