Case law

Somerton v. the Bell Tele. Co. of Pa.

111 Pa. Super. 264 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1933

Defendant then appealed to the court below; under date of June 28, 1933, its exceptions to the action of the board were dismissed and judgment entered in favor of claimant upon the award as modified; this appeal is by the … Paolis v. Tower Hill C. Coke Co., 265 Pa. 291 , 108 A. 638 ; Elkins v. Cambria Library Assn., 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 144 ; McGuirk v. Sun Shipbuilding Co., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 457 .

In Re: Appeal of E.J. White

85 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1925

Brabender, 201 Pa. 574 ; publicly exhibiting motion pictures without approval of the state board of censors,— Film Corp. v. … In Mahon v.

Armstrong v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan

356 Pa. Super. 454 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1986

We refer appellant to the case of Brown v. Travelers Insurance Company, 355 Pa.Super. 535 , 513 A.2d 1051 (1986). Order affirmed. BROSKY, J., files dissenting opinion.

Hoon v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

149 Pa. Super. 236 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1942

In Thomas v. Tasty Baking Company et al., 140 Pa. … The judgment of the court below is reversed and is now entered for the defendant in accordance with the order of the board.

Moyer v. Morysville Body Works, Inc.

215 Pa. Super. 167 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969

The Board’s decision was based primarily on the decisions of our court in Scott v. United States Steel Corporation, 203 Pa. Superior Ct. 459, 201 A. 2d 243 (1964) and Porter v. Sterling Supply Corp., 203 Pa. … See Mills v. Detroit Tuberculosis Sanitarium, 323 Mich. 200, 35 N.W. 2d 239 (1948); Aleutian Homes v. Fischer, 418 P. 2d 769 (1966); Concainnon v. Oregon Portland Cement Company, 447 P. 2d 290 (1968); Glodenis v.

Sober v. Pennsylvania Manufacturers Ass'n

220 Pa. Super. 22 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1971

On October 3, 1968, *24 the Board entered an order awarding compensation for total disability. … See Graham v. Hillman Coal and Coke Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 579, 586 , 186 Atl. 400, 402 (1936); Angelaccio v. Kaiser Fleetwings, 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 607, 611 , 190 A. 2d 157, 159 (1963).

Meyers v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

164 Pa. Super. 431 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1949

Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, supra. … O’Donnell v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 533, 536 , 45 A. 2d 369 ; Faust v. Cairns, 242 Pa. 15, 16 , 88 A. 786 . Appeals are dismissed, at the cost of appellant.

Wales Textile Co. v. Commercial Factors Corp.

107 Pa. Super. 202 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1932

Superior Ct. 372, 374 ; at least when no explanation is given of the change: Penrose v. Caldwell, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 ; Elzea v. Brown, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 403, 407 ; Simon v. Magaziner, 87 Pa. … King, 57 Pa. 202, 205 ; McDermott v. Miners’ Savings Bank, 100 Pa. 285, 287 ; Peoples Bank v. McDowell National Bank, 103 Pa. Superior Ct. 241, 247 . The credit memorandum did no more than recognize this liability.

Morley v. Morley

283 Pa. Super. 397 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 1981

Halderman v. Halderman, 230 Pa.Super. 125 , 326 A.2d 908 (1974); Commonwealth ex rel. Friedman v. Friedman, 223 Pa.Super. 66 , 297 A.2d 158 (1972); Commonwealth ex rel. Young v. … Brown v.

West Philadelphia Therapy Center v. Erie Insurance Group

2000 Pa. Super. 94 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 2000

He is board eligible in chiropractic rehabilitation and is licensed in this Commonwealth' for chiropractics. … Davidson improperly indicated he was board certified, which is a higher achievement than his board eligible status, on his cur *1169 riculum vitae should not affect his qualification status.

Commonwealth ex rel. Gallagher v. Martin

183 Pa. Super. 540 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

The Parole Board and prison authorities held him until March 28, 1957 1 on the ground that the Act of June 19, 1911, P. L. 1055, §10 as last amended by the Act of June 22, 1931, P. … Lerner v. Smith, Warden, 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 265 , 30 A. 2d 347 (1943); Com. ex rel. Harman v. Burke, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 547 , 91 A. 2d 385 (1952).

Joebon v. Reitz Coal Company

136 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1939

This raised a question of fact for the decision of the board. The board decided it against the claimant. … See Hoosca v. Lytle Coal Co., 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 434, 436 , 196 A. 892 ; Magiocco v. U. S. Aluminum Co., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 341, 342, 343 , 200 A. 117 . Judgment affirmed.

Brobst v. Brobst

171 Pa. Super. 499 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

Another witness, Beatrice Brown, testified that when she was baby-sitting for Mrs. Barrett at about 11 p.m. one evening Mrs. … Jackson v. Jackson, 49 Pa. Superior Ct. 18, 23 ; Isaacs v. Isaacs, 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 508, 512 , 27 A. 2d 531 . As was said in Pierpoint v. Pierpoint, 108 Pa.

Evolo Liquor License Case

204 Pa. Super. 225 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1964

Opinion by Montgomery, J., The appellee’s distributor license issued by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board was suspended by the board for 20 days because of an alleged violation, viz., “. . . the licensee, his servants … Perry v. Ryback, 302 Pa. 559 , 153 A. 770 (1931); Cobb’s Executor v. Burns and Wife, 61 Pa. 278 (1869); 14 P.L.E. Evidence §118.

Obradovich Liquor License Case

180 Pa. Super. 383 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956

In Bell Telephone Co. of Pa. v. … United States, 295 U.S. 495 ; Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, supra; O'Neil v. Insurance Co., 166 Pa. 72 ': Holgate Bros. Co. v. Bashore, 331 Pa. 255, 260, 263 , 200 A. 672 ." See also Hotel Casey Co. v.

Walker v. Davis

189 Pa. Super. 564 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

Perhaps the strongest argument for a further reduction in this case is supplied by Brown v. Paxton, 332 Pa. 260 , 2 A. 2d 729 . … Compare however Kummerlen et al. v.

Bullman v. Giuntoli

2000 Pa. Super. 284 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 2000

onto the board and began crossing the board toward the entrance of the house. … the insulation board into the basement.

Bricker v. Kline

86 Pa. Super. 594 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1925

This was quoted with approval in Shontz v. Brown, 27 Pa. 123, 131 , the court then continuing : “And though in special circumstances, such as were presented in Selden v. … Gould, 149 Pa. 68 ; Brown v. Moorhead, 8 *599 S. & R. 569; or a reservation in the articles is omitted from the deed: Harbold v. Kuster, 44 Pa. 392 ; Backenstoss v.

Kelly v. Star Auto Painting Co.

161 Pa. Super. 503 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1947

Opinion by Dithrich, J., In this appeal from an award of workmen’s compensation, we find that there are not sufficient findings of fact by the referee or the board to sustain the award. … In Binkley v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. et al., 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 381 , 40 A. 2d 132 , and Petrucci v. Payne Coal Company, 157 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Egan

451 Pa. Super. 219 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 21, 1996

Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 436 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1190 (1994), quoting Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa. 592, 599 , 493 A.2d 669, 672 (1985). … Commonwealth v. Devers, 519 Pa. 88 , 546 A.2d 12 (1988); Commonwealth v. Blackwell, 436 Pa.Super. 294 , 647 A.2d 915 (1994), appeal denied, 540 Pa. 576 , 655 A.2d 509 (1995); Commonwealth v.