Case law

Frick v. Pittsburgh School District

167 Pa. Super. 431 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

The credibility of expert witnesses and *435 the weight to be attached to their testimony are matters exclusively for the Board and in a conflict of opinions in the medical testimony it is for the Board to decide which conclusion … Coder v. Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel Co., supra.

Eggelton v. LEETE

186 Pa. Super. 542 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

This conclusion was reversed by the board on appeal. The defendant thereafter filed an appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Potter County where the action of the board was affirmed. … Stevens v. Publishers Agency et al., supra.

Commonwealth v. Herbert

2014 Pa. Super. 18 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 2014

Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 640 (Pa.Super.2013) (internal citations omitted), quoting Lang v. Meske, 850 A.2d 737, 739-740 (Pa.Super.2004). … In Commonwealth v.

Sagamore Estates Property Owners Ass'n v. Sklar

2013 Pa. Super. 314 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 5, 2013

Similarly, Article 8, Section 1 of SE-POA’s bylaws addresses the powers of the board of directors (“the Board”) and provides that “[t]he Board has the full power and responsibility for carrying out the purposes of this corporation … See Zikria v.

Commonwealth v. West

270 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1979

the proper documents and fees to the Board in a timely fashion. … It is clear from the Act that these are separate Board functions.

Buchman Tax Assessment Case

164 Pa. Super. 137 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1948

The Board of Assessment and Revision of Taxes fixed the value of the buildings at $44,000 and the land at $6,000, or a total of $50,000. The eommon pleas sustained the board and this appeal followed. … Board of Revision of Taxes and Appeals, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 101 , 53 A. 2d 889 . The real estate had been owned and operated as a bank.

Horn v. Fitler Company

115 Pa. Super. 188 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1934

The Board affirmed the award of the referee. The court, on appeal, entered judgment on the award. From that judgment this appeal was taken. … Independent of the testimony of Rev; Craig, we think there was sufficient evidence to sustain the finding of the Board. As stated in Lacey v.

Ware v. Northern Metal Co.

147 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1941

We held in Newancavitch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. 131 Pa. … In the case of Bucci v.

Racicot v. Erie Insurance Exchange

2003 Pa. Super. 443 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2003

Co. v. … Co. v.

Sulewski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

168 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1951

Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc., 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 29 , 46 A. 2d 512 ; Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 39 A. 2d 534 . … without a capricious disregard of the competent evidence”: Walsh v.

Lowdermilk v. Lorah

124 Pa. Super. 356 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1936

The appellee cited Graham v. Hillman C. & C. Co., 122 Pa. … In Kessler v. North Side Packing Co. et al., 122 Pa.

Vernam v. Wilson

31 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 30, 1906

(Withers v. Atkinson, 1 Watts, 236 ; Stitzel v. Kopp, 9 W. & S. 29 ).” The doctrine of Withers v. … Brown, 18 Pa. Superior Ct. 117 .

Poulides, N. v. American Theater Arts for Youth

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2014

Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, 927 A.2d 209, 216 (Pa.2007). In view of our recent decision in Maya v. … In addition, in Eiser v.

Commonwealth v. Zang

142 Pa. Super. 573 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1940

Commonwealth v. Eisenhower, 181 Pa. 470, 476 , 37 A. 521 ; Commonwealth v. Viscosky et al., 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 96, 106 . … District Attorney v.

Commonwealth v. Hansley

2010 Pa. Super. 81 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 2010

Casiano v. Casiano, 815 A.2d 638, 642 (Pa.Super.2002). … of Probation and Parole (Parole Board).

Kauffman v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.

153 Pa. Super. 67 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1943

The dictum in Downs v. Linton’s Lunch, 134 Pa. … Judgment is affirmed. 1 The board found that the receipt was dated April 19, 1938 but that the draft was paid April 30, 1938. See Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co., 152 Pa.

Pleasant Hills Borough Inc. Case

161 Pa. Super. 259 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1947

Ross v. Golden et ux., 344 Pa. 487 , 25 A. 2d 700 ; Donaldson v. Fellabum, 68 Pa. Superior Ct. 347 . The point of beginning of the description in this case is as definite as though fixed by monument (Cf. … Ake v. Mason, 101 Pa. 17 ; Airey v. Kunkle, 190 Pa. 196 , 42 A. 533 .

Wisniewski v. GREAT A. & P. TEA. CO.

226 Pa. Super. 574 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1974

The child spit out a piece of red string and "something brown." In inspecting the kitchen for a source of the materials in question, Mrs. … It was all brown stuff in there and string and it just looked awful." Although the child apparently suffered no further adverse effects, Mrs.

Waite v. Pittsburgh Limestone Co.

78 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1921

and the court below. • We have, in accordance with the rule laid down in Kuca v. … We are all of opinion that under the decisions of this court in Blouss v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., supra; Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co., 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 454 , and Granville v. Scranton Coal Co., 76 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Bryant

2012 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 26, 2012

Commonwealth v. Brown, 721 A.2d 1105, 1106 (Pa.Super.1998). Furthermore, “[t]he common sense of the community should be considered when interpreting the language of the statute.” Id. at 1106-07 . … See Brown v. Levy, 993 A.2d 364 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010). That notice of appeal, even if perfected later by Appellant’s second notice of appeal, properly invoked this court's jurisdiction.