Case law

Kasavage v. State Workmen's Ins. Fund

109 Pa. Super. 231 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1933

Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 , 123 A. 766 . … Black v. Herman, 297 Pa. 230 , 146 A. 550 . In Tolan v. P. & R. C.; & I.

In Re Appeals of Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Co.

83 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1924

The Board for the Assessment and Revision of Taxes in the County of Allegheny assessed as real estate for the year 1923 the property of the company. … A tax law cannot be extended by construction to things not named or described as the subject of taxation: Boyd v. Hood, 57 Pa. 98, 101 ; Patterson v.

Matelivicz v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

147 Pa. Super. 479 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1941

The action of the board was affirmed by the court of common pleas and judgment was entered for claimant on the award. Defendant appeals. … Superior Ct. 264 , 3 A. 2d 995 ; Monahan v. Seeds & Durham et al., 336 Pa. 67, 71 , 6 A. 2d 889 ; Beck v. Franklin Glass Corp. et al., supra.

Schreckengost v. GOSPEL TABERNACLE

188 Pa. Super. 652 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

Eggelton v. Leete, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 542 , 142 A. 2d 777 . … Reitmyer v. Coxe Bros. & Co., Inc., 264 Pa. 372 , 107 A. 739 ; James v. Shapiro, 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , 5 A. 2d 815 .

Commonwealth v. Barber

275 Pa. Super. 144 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1980

At about 7:00 p. m. appellant arrived at Guy’s house carrying a rifle in a brown box. … In Pyle v.

Stryker v. Lycoming County

20 Pa. Super. 345 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1902

What part of this item is for boarding and lodging the prisoner, and what part for “ detention,” does not appear. … See Richardson v. Clarion County, 14 Pa. 198 , Lycoming County Commissioners v. Hall, 7 Watts, 290 , and Allegheny County v. Watt, 3 Pa. 462 . But the charge for “detention” is too indefinite.

Fell v. John F. Betz & Son, Ltd.

22 Pa. Super. 418 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1903

The decision of a referee under the act of May 14, 1874, upon the facts, will not, when there is any evidence to support it, be disturbed, so long as the conclusion is untainted by fraud: Brown v. … Dempsey, 95 Pa. 243 ; Commonwealth v. Hulings, 129 Pa. 317 ; Commonwealth v. Westinghouse Air Brake Company, 151 Pa. 276 .

Commonwealth v. Hale

2014 Pa. Super. 19 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 2014

Brown where she kept her money before taking her television and fleeing. A neighbor heard the screams of Ms. Brown and her son and telephoned police. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 417 Pa.Super. 165 , 611 A.2d 1318 (1992). Wade, supra at 114 (quoting Commonwealth v. Moye, 836 A.2d 973 (Pa.Super.2003)).

McAllister Unemployment Compensation Case

197 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962

Progress Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 406 Pa. 163 , 176 A. 2d 632 (1962). … On appeal, after hearing testimony, the referee and the Unemployment Compensation Board of Revietv affirmed the decision of the Bureau. There is nothing before us except the appeal from the decision of the Board.

Com. v. Boyle

108 Pa. Super. 598 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1933

This question was passed upon in Com. v. Johnson, 89 Pa. Superior Ct. 439 , and Com. v. Freed, 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 529 , 162 A. 679 , 684. … King’ testified further that he went with Boyle to see Father Brown and remained in the machine, about 50 feet away.

Aboud v. Aluminum Seal Co.

162 Pa. Super. 482 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1947

We do not agree this case is governed by Roberts v. Hillman Coal and Coke Co., supra, and Huha v. Frick Coke Co., supra, relied on by the court below and the-appellee. … Superior Ct. 480 , 178 A. 161 ; Marshall v. Pittsburgh, 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 189 , 180 A. 733 ; Carey v. Weidlandt and Co., 100 Pa. Superior Ct. 220 .

Commonwealth v. One 1958 Plymouth Sedan (McGonigle)

199 Pa. Super. 428 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1962

We repeat what we said in Com. v. One 1955 Buick Sedan, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 133, 137, 138 , 182 A. 2d *431 280 : “The leading case in this field is Carroll v. United States, 267 U. … LPIN3159 be and the same is hereby forfeited and condemned and it is ordered that the vehicle shall be delivered to the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board for its use or sale or disposition by the board in its discretion,

Helping Hand Building & Loan Ass'n v. Buss

13 Pa. Super. 343 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1900

Elizabeth, etc., Association, 104 Pa. 394 ; Erthal v. Glueck, 10 Pa. Superior Ct. 402 . … In order to bind the association it was not necessary that a formal resolution of the board of directors be passed and duly recorded upon its minutes: Badders’s Estate, 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 465 ; Kelsey v.

Somerton v. the Bell Tele. Co. of Pa.

111 Pa. Super. 264 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1933

Defendant then appealed to the court below; under date of June 28, 1933, its exceptions to the action of the board were dismissed and judgment entered in favor of claimant upon the award as modified; this appeal is by the … Paolis v. Tower Hill C. Coke Co., 265 Pa. 291 , 108 A. 638 ; Elkins v. Cambria Library Assn., 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 144 ; McGuirk v. Sun Shipbuilding Co., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 457 .

Frick v. Pittsburgh School District

167 Pa. Super. 431 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

The credibility of expert witnesses and *435 the weight to be attached to their testimony are matters exclusively for the Board and in a conflict of opinions in the medical testimony it is for the Board to decide which conclusion … Coder v. Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel Co., supra.

Ware v. Northern Metal Co.

147 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1941

We held in Newancavitch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. 131 Pa. … In the case of Bucci v.

Racicot v. Erie Insurance Exchange

2003 Pa. Super. 443 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2003

Co. v. … Co. v.

Roloson's Estate

79 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922

a writing offered as a test or standard, nothing short of evidence by a person who saw the party writing the paper, or to whom the party admitted having written it, or evidence of equal authority, is sufficient: Travis v. … Brown, 43 Pa. 9 . The law in this respect has not been changed by the Act of May 15, 1895, P. L. 69; *126 Shannon v. Castner, 21 Pa.

Sulewski v. Baldwin Locomotive Works

168 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1951

Bingaman v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, Inc., 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 29 , 46 A. 2d 512 ; Metz v. Quakertown Stove Works, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 39 A. 2d 534 . … without a capricious disregard of the competent evidence”: Walsh v.

Lowdermilk v. Lorah

124 Pa. Super. 356 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1936

The appellee cited Graham v. Hillman C. & C. Co., 122 Pa. … In Kessler v. North Side Packing Co. et al., 122 Pa.