Case law

Condio v. Erie Insurance Exchange

2006 Pa. Super. 92 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 2006

v. … Condio v. Erie Ins.

Schubert v. Oswald & Hess Co.

161 Pa. Super. 309 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1947

After a second hearing, another referee, again sustained by the board, found for claimant. … Nelson, would supply a firm predicate for the finding of *315 the board.

Commonwealth ex rel. Scasserra v. Baldi

180 Pa. Super. 635 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1956

Scasserra v. Keenan, 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 636, 638 , 106 A. 2d 843 . The Pennsylvania Board of Parole on May 12, 1954, granted relator a parole effective May 18, 1954. See Com. ex rel. Scasserra v. Baldi, 180 Pa. … Carmelo v. Smith, 347 Pa. 495, 496 (1943).

Allem (Ahlum) v. E.J. Romig Son

100 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1930

Tbe compensation board dismissed her appeal and tbe common pleas sustained tbe board. … This is the real criterion in cases of this character: Creasy v. Phoenix Utilities Co., 276 Pa. 583 . The order of the court below sustaining the Workmen’s Compensation Board was right. The judgment is affirmed.

Waddell v. Shriber

238 Pa. Super. 241 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1976

Waddell v. Shriber, - Pa. -, 348 A. 2d 96 (1975). … Mendelson v. Shrager, 432 Pa. 383, 385 , 248 A.2d 234, 235 (1968). Flightways Corp. v. Keystone Helicopter Corp., 459 Pa. 660, 662-663 , 331 A.2d 184, 185 (1975); Borough of Ambridge Water Authority v.

Commonwealth v. Guzman

2012 Pa. Super. 93 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2012

Commonwealth v. Brown, 606 Pa. 198, 203 , 996 A.2d 473, 476 (2010). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544, 551-52 (Pa.Super.2011) (en banc) (citing Horton v.

Cooper v. Byllesby Engineering & Management Co.

140 Pa. Super. 158 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1940

Again *160 the referee set aside the receipt and, on successive appeals, his action was affirmed by the board and a court of common pleas. … We are of the opinion that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the findings by the referee and board and that the case is ruled by Shuler v. Midvalley Coal Co., 296 Pa. 503 , 146 A. 146 , and Eberst v.

Balser v. Young

72 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

In Guilmartin v. … In Henderson v.

Minster, Jr. v. Blair, Inc.

94 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1928

Following the practice of the Supreme Court (Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143 ; Brown v.

Kloskowski v. Hudson Coal Co.

144 Pa. Super. 393 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1941

of fact: Kloskowski v. … Defendant thereupon appealed to the Workmen’s Compensation Board, excepting to the said conclusions and award, and under date of June 7,1940, the board, in an opinion by Chairman Murphy, struck out the referee’s conclusions

Waite v. Pittsburgh Limestone Co.

78 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1921

and the court below. • We have, in accordance with the rule laid down in Kuca v. … We are all of opinion that under the decisions of this court in Blouss v. D., L. & W. R. R. Co., supra; Hale v. Savage Fire Brick Co., 75 Pa. Superior Ct. 454 , and Granville v. Scranton Coal Co., 76 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Herbert

2014 Pa. Super. 18 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 2014

Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 640 (Pa.Super.2013) (internal citations omitted), quoting Lang v. Meske, 850 A.2d 737, 739-740 (Pa.Super.2004). … In Commonwealth v.

Burger, for Use v. Freedom Twp.

126 Pa. Super. 128 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1936

Rosol, 317 Pa. 91 , 176 A. 236 ; Mallisee v. Hawkins, 322 Pa. 58 , 185 A. 230 ; Fischer v. Hale, 63 Pa. Superior Ct. 204 ; Dippy v. Emerson C. Custis & Co., 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 274 , 176 A. 551 . … Bk. of Bangor v. Bangor Tr. Co., 297 Pa. 115, 146 A. 595 ; Walker v. Emerich, 300 Pa. 9 , 149 A. 881 .

School District of Pittsburgh v. Trumbull Corp.

235 Pa. Super. 412 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1975

Curiam, The court below dismissed a complaint against the Urban Redevelopment Authority of Pittsburgh because the court believed that the Redevelopment Authority was entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity under Brown … v.

Kasavage v. State Workmen's Ins. Fund

109 Pa. Super. 231 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1933

Meucci v. Gallatin Coal Co., 279 Pa. 184 , 123 A. 766 . … Black v. Herman, 297 Pa. 230 , 146 A. 550 . In Tolan v. P. & R. C.; & I.

Cinousis v. Hechinger Department Store

406 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1991

Brown v. Delaware Valley Transplant Program, 371 Pa.Super. 583, 586 , 538 A.2d 889, 891 (1988). … New York Central Railroad Co., supra, 429 Pa. at 238-240 , 240 A.2d at 373-374 ; Brown v. Delaware Valley Transplant Program, supra, 371 Pa.Super. at 586-587 , 538 A.2d at 891 ; Petty v.

Kauffman v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.

153 Pa. Super. 67 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1943

The dictum in Downs v. Linton’s Lunch, 134 Pa. … Judgment is affirmed. 1 The board found that the receipt was dated April 19, 1938 but that the draft was paid April 30, 1938. See Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co., 152 Pa.

Baldwin Appeal

153 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1943

Kelley v. Pommer et al., 330 Pa. 421, 436 , 199 A. 485 , and cases there cited. … Voltz v. County of Erie, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 467 , relied upon by appellant, is distinguishable and not controlling here.

In Re Appeals of Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Co.

83 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1924

The Board for the Assessment and Revision of Taxes in the County of Allegheny assessed as real estate for the year 1923 the property of the company. … A tax law cannot be extended by construction to things not named or described as the subject of taxation: Boyd v. Hood, 57 Pa. 98, 101 ; Patterson v.

Miller v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.

129 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1937

The claimant’s only exception to the order of the board, on appeal to the court of common pleas, was to the statement or conclusion of the board that certain records — especially the Mercy Hospital records of the deceased … smacked too much of a defense to an anticipated compensation claim, and, in consequence, was lacking in the second requirement for the admission generally of hospital records, referred to by the present Chief Justice in Paxos v.