Case law

Reitz, J. v. Flower, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 2024

See Deek Investment, L.P. v. … Smith v. Jones, 216 A.3d 1234 (Pa. 2018); 2. Johnson v. Johnson, 198 A.3d 567 (Pa.Super. 2017); 3. Brown v. Green, 180 A.3d 890 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2016); 4. Wilson v.

Commonwealth v. Barensfeld

278 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 23, 1980

Commonwealth v. Brown, 228 Pa.Super. 158 , 323 A.2d 104 (1974); Commonwealth v. Bailey, 460 Pa. 498 , 333 A.2d 883 (1975); Commonwealth v. Smith, 453 Pa. 326 , 309 A.2d 413 (1973). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 228 Pa.Super. 158 , 323 A.2d 104 (1974); Commonwealth v. Cruse, 236 Pa.Super. 85 , 344 A.2d 532 (1975).

Schreckengost v. GOSPEL TABERNACLE

188 Pa. Super. 652 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

Eggelton v. Leete, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 542 , 142 A. 2d 777 . … Reitmyer v. Coxe Bros. & Co., Inc., 264 Pa. 372 , 107 A. 739 ; James v. Shapiro, 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , 5 A. 2d 815 .

Pryor v. Sweet's Steel Co.

151 Pa. Super. 99 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1942

Where the decision of the board is against the party having the burden of proof, the question before the court is whether the board’s findings of fact are consistent with each other and with its conclusions of law and its … The instant case is governed by Hamer v. Rishel, 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 585, 24 A. 2d 664 .

Misinkaitis Unempl. Comp. Case

169 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 6, 1951. July 19, 1951. *125 Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, DITHRICH, ROSS, ARNOLD and GUNTHER, JJ. … Barclay White Co. v.

Martini v. Director General of Railroads

77 Pa. Super. 529 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1921

Co. v. Hancock, 253 U. S. 284 ; Ry. Co. v. Di Donato, 253 U. S. 480 , (41 Sup. Ct. Rep. 516). … As it is a question of the paramount federal law, we are not bound by the findings of fact made by the referee and approved by the board, but must make our own deductions from the evidence. In Ry. Co. v. Polk, 253 U.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Warner v. Ashe, Warden

140 Pa. Super. 496 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1940

On February 6, 1940 he appeared again before the Board of Trustees of the Penitentiary and was correctly informed that it had no authority under the law to recommend him for another parole. See Com. ex rel. Meinzer v. … Kent v. Smith, 323 Pa. 89 , 186 A. 812 . The case of Narcise v. Board of *499 Trustees, Eastern State Penitentiary, 137 Pa.

Com. v. Collins, J.

286 A.3d 767 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 2022

See Wirth v. … Id. at 757 (quoting Commonwealth v. Brown, 26 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa. Super. 2011)). In his brief, Collins relies on the seminal United States Supreme Court decision of Chaplinsky v.

Fayette County Housing Authority v. Housing & Redevelopment Insurance Exchange

2001 Pa. Super. 83 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 2001

Washington v. … Co. v. Steely, 746 A.2d 607, 612 (Pa.Super.1999), citing, Madison Construction Co. v. Harleysville Mutual Ins.

Weiner v. Fisher

2005 Pa. Super. 118 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 1, 2005

See 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1921(b); Pennsylvania School Boards Ass’n v. Commonwealth Public School Employees’ Ret. Bd., — Pa. -, -, 863 A.2d 432, 435 (2004); Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. … , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e). 40 P.S. § 1303.512(b) & (c). ¶ 10 Appellant contends that the statutory time-frame for retirement “within the previous five

Eves v. Tritch Et Ux.

162 Pa. Super. 443 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1948

A year after the board fence was torn down, a wire fence was erected by the defendants. They contend it was erected on the same line as the board fence. … Lutz v. Allegheny County, 327 Pa. 587 , 195 A. 1; Beardslee v. Columbia, Township, 188 Pa. 496 , 41 A. 617 ; Thompson v. American Steel & Wire Co., 317 Pa. 7 , 175 A. 541 . No abuse appears here. Judgment affirmed.

Delucca's Liquor License Case

124 Pa. Super. 500 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1936

In Com. v. … The. essentials of a “proper hearing” were considered in Com. v. MeMenamin, supra.

Logar v. Main, Beaver & Black Creek Mutual Fire & Lightning Insurance

118 Pa. Super. 16 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1935

issued must be approved by the Board of Directors. … In Wilson v. Ins.

Yost v. Philadelphia

174 Pa. Super. 555 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1954

See McCosh v. Myers, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 61 ; Vogeley v. Hay, 86 Pa. Superior Ct. 266 . Appellant places principal reliance on Brown v. White, 202 Pa. 297 , 51 A. 962 ; and Fougeray v. … In the Brown case, while there was evidence of the character and extent of services rendered by physicians, there was no evidence whatever of the amounts charged.

Miele Unemployment Compensation Case

174 Pa. Super. 203 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1953

As Judge Hirt stated in Michalsky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 163 Pa. … Barclay White Co. v. Unemp. Comp. Bd., 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 . In Dept. L. & I. etc. v. Unemplmnt. Comp. Bd., 148 Pa.

Evans v. Hazle Brook Coal Co.

134 Pa. Super. 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1938

The referee awarded compensation, and the award was affirmed by the board. The court of common pleas, on appeal by defendant, affirmed the board and entered judgment for the amount of the award. … The connection was established by competent evidence (Witt v. Witt’s Food Market et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 557, 564 , 186 A. 275 ). Lacey v. Washburn & Williams Co., supra, and Micale v.

Wimble v. Parx Casino & Greenwood Gaming & Entertainment, Inc.

2012 Pa. Super. 62 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2012

Inc. v. Bell Atl. Props. Inc., 692 A.2d 570, 573 (Pa.Super.1997). … In support of this claim, Wimble cites Hamre v.

Commonwealth v. West

270 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1979

the proper documents and fees to the Board in a timely fashion. … It is clear from the Act that these are separate Board functions.

John v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

113 Pa. Super. 493 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1934

Under the evidence, the board was justified in substituting its own findings for his. … We may add that in Karpati v. Cambria Steel Co., 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 202 and Allem (Ahlum) v. E. J. Romig & Son, 100 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Manson

230 Pa. Super. 527 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1974

The window had been boarded up, but several boards were missing. The officer observed a pile of household goods inside the house and next to the window. … Commonwealth v. Bailey, 448 Pa. 224 , 292 A. 2d 345 (1972); Commonwealth v. Garrett, 423 Pa. 8 , 222 A. 2d 902 (1966); Commonwealth v. Craft, 215 Pa. Superior Ct. 477 , 258 A. 2d 537 (1969). In Commonwealth v.