Case law

Waleski v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

108 Pa. Super. 342 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1932

Superior Ct. 178 , the board made an award in the stun of $3,305.71. … See also Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199, 206 .

Ruettger v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

164 Pa. Super. 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1948

In Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. … It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion’: Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U. S. 197, 229 .

Allem (Ahlum) v. E.J. Romig Son

100 Pa. Super. 502 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1930

Tbe compensation board dismissed her appeal and tbe common pleas sustained tbe board. … This is the real criterion in cases of this character: Creasy v. Phoenix Utilities Co., 276 Pa. 583 . The order of the court below sustaining the Workmen’s Compensation Board was right. The judgment is affirmed.

Henry Heymann Building & Loan Ass'n v. Denney

130 Pa. Super. 167 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1937

As we pointed out in Homer B. & L. v. S. Makransky Sons, 126 Pa. … Assn. v.

Commonwealth v. Santiago

429 Pa. Super. 135 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 1993

See Commonwealth v. Carter, 427 Pa. 53 , 233 A.2d 284 (1967). … See United States v. Harley, 682 F.2d 1018 (D.C.Cir.1982).

N.H. Weidner, Inc. v. Berman

310 Pa. Super. 590 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 1983

Giallorenzo v. American Druggists’ Insurance Company, 301 Pa.Super. 294 , 447 A.2d 974 (1982); Butterbaugh v. Westons Shopper City, Inc., 300 Pa.Super. 331 , 446 A.2d 641 (1982); Paules v. … Franklin Interiors, Inc., v. Browns Lane Inc., 227 Pa.Super. 252 , 323 A.2d 226 (1974); Phillips v. Evans, 164 Pa.Super. 410 , 65 A.2d 423 (1949).

Commonwealth v. Herr

39 Pa. Super. 454 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1909

Such a title, though general, will cover all details and collateral matters naturally and properly incident to the subject: Stegmaier v. Jones, 203 Pa. 47 : ” Com. v. Darmska, 35 Pa. Superior Ct. 580; Weiss v. … Co. v. Riblet, 66 Pa. 164 .

Com. v. Ross, A.

297 A.3d 787 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 2023

.”); see also Commonwealth v. Brown, 654 A.2d 1096, 1100 (Pa. Super. 1995). … Brown, 654 A.2d at 1103.

Neuls v. Scranton City

20 Pa. Super. 286 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1902

The assessors in office in that city were not, by the act of 1889, authorized to sit as a board of appeals, that duty under their old form of government being discharged by a joint committee of councils. … The constitutionality of the act of 1901 is no longer a question for profitable discussion; all the objections raised by the appellant have been definitely disposed of by the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Miller

2001 Pa. Super. 78 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2001

. ¶ 5 The authority to parole convicted offenders is divided between the courts of common pleas and the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole. Commonwealth v. Harris, 423 Pa.Super. 190 , 620 A.2d 1175 (1993). … See Trial Court Opinion, 3/10/00, at 4; Commonwealth v. Tilghman, 543 Pa. 578 , 673 A.2d 898 (1996); Harris, 620 A.2d at 1178 . The above statement of the law by the trial court is accurate.

Kovatch Et Ux. v. Durkin

116 Pa. Super. 192 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 1934

The board on appeal affirmed the award. … Although the question of dependency is primarily one of fact and under the statute, a question of fact must be determined by the referee and the compensation board: Hallman v. Starr Printing Co., 70 Pa.

Lancaster Theological Seminary Tax Exemption Case

207 Pa. Super. 12 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1965

Opinion by Hoffman, J., The Lancaster County Board for the Assessment and Revision of Taxes [Board] appeals from the order of the lower court directing it to exempt from local taxation certain real estate owned by The Lancaster … Barnes Foundation v. Keely, 314 Pa. 112, 118 , 171 A. 267, 269 (1934) ; County of Lancaster v. Y.W.C.A. of Lancaster, 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 514, 518 (1928).

Commonwealth v. Benn

451 Pa. Super. 538 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1996

Williams v. … In Commonwealth v.

Guy v. Stoecklein Baking Co.

133 Pa. Super. 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1938

The board, however, has given us the benefit of a finding, or the equivalent of a finding, which is made the basis of its conclusion. … Thompson, 212 Pa. 561 , 61 A. 1024 ; Wise v. Cambridge Springs Boro., supra; Horton v. W. Penn Power Co., supra.

Mathias v. Carpenter

402 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1991

Veno v. Meredith, 357 Pa.Super. 85, 92 , 515 A.2d 571, 575 (1986) quoting Braig v. … On appeal to the Court of Common Pleas of Carbon County, the school board members were found not guilty. 2 .

Stine v. Borst

205 Pa. Super. 46 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

The fact finder, the board in this case, found that Borst was the employer and that is controlling upon the court below and is also controlling upon us. The principle, as illustrated in the cases of Rau v. … Mellon National Bank & Trust Co. v.

Williams v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

155 Pa. Super. 435 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1944

The referee made an award which was affirmed by the board and the court. … The weight to be given the testimony of medical experts and the reasonable inferences to be drawn from it are exclusively for the referee and the board. Kennedy v. Holmes Const. Co., 147 Pa.

Thorn v. STRAWBRIDGE & CLOTHIER

191 Pa. Super. 59 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1959

Upon appeal to the board, it affirmed the referee’s findings, conclusions and award. The court below affirmed the board. Section 315 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of June 2, 1915, P. … If there is competent and substantial evidence in the record to sustain the findings of the board, they are conclusive and cannot be disturbed by the courts. Kelemon v. Reiber, supra; Osterritter v.

Biesecker v. Cobb

13 Pa. Super. 56 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 1900

L. 143, the debts of a decedent were liens upon his real estate against all the world for an indefinite period of time: Konigmaker v. Brown, 14 Pa. 269 . … Allen, as well as in the present case, it was, and, as against him, its duration was without limitation of time: Brown’s Appeal, 91 Pa. 485 ; Middleton v. Middleton, 106 Pa. 252 .

Armbruster v. Horowitz

1999 Pa. Super. 333 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1999

In light of Brown, [Com. v.] Widmer, [ 446 Pa.Super. 408 , 667 A.2d 215 (1995)] and [Com. v.] Hodge, [ 441 Pa.Super. 653 , 658 A.2d 386 (1995)] we are precluded from addressing [the appellant’s] first issue. … Commonwealth v.