Case law

Titus v. S. E. Sostmann & Co.

133 Pa. Super. 201 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1938

The defendant insurance carrier appealed to the court of common pleas, which reversed the board and dismissed the petition. Claimant has appealed to this court. … Superior Ct. 161 , 190 A. 166 ; Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co. et al., 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 108 , 190 A. 343 ; Krapf v. Arthur, 95 Pa. Superior Ct. 468 ; Green v. Hiestand Bros. et al., 103 Pa.

Malek v. Gimbel Bros.

193 Pa. Super. 182 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1960

Brown, and later Dr. Skversky. In the nature of specific losses, claim was made for the services of Dr. Brown and Dr. Skversky, also for a laboratory charge, and for pharmacy bills covering bandages and elastic hose. … Cobb v. Chubeck, 399 Pa. 201 , 160 A. 2d 207 . *185 In brief, onr review of this record does not reveal any abuse of discretion.

Commonwealth v. Banks

198 A.3d 391 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 2018

Id. at 20-21 (citing in support Commonwealth v. Brown, 469 A.2d 1371 (Pa. 1983)). Thus, Banks concludes, the revocation court abused its discretion. Id. at 21. … Commonwealth v. Ahearn, 670 A.2d 133, 135 (Pa. 1996) (citations omitted) (emphasis added). Thus, the double jeopardy concerns recognized in Brown are not present here.

Commonwealth v. Baker

361 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1987

See Commonwealth v. Brown, 328 Pa.Super. 215 , 476 A.2d 969 (1984). … See Commonwealth v. Guest, 500 Pa. 393, 398 , 456 A.2d 1345, 1348 (1983); Brown, supra.

Wood v. U. S. Natl. B. & L. Ass'n

100 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1930

According to the practice of the Supreme Court (Wilson v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co., 225 Pa. 143 ; Brown v. Unger, 269 Pa. 471 ) and of this court, (Minster v. Blair, 94 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Lateef

446 Pa. Super. 640 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 29, 1995

At 9:30 p.m., Officer David Brown radioed that he was following a vehicle matching the description. Officer Brown stopped the vehicle, and moments later Detective Polnar arrived. … In Commonwealth v.

Feldman v. Pictorial Review—Women's World Publishing Co.

122 Pa. Super. 491 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 1936

The referee disallowed the claim, and was affirmed by the board. … In Creasy v.

Mattis Et Ux. v. Arcadia Coal Co.

148 Pa. Super. 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1942

In other words, he was spending on his car and for entertainment over 3 times the amount he was paying to his parents for his board, lodging, etc. … In Creasey v.

Commonwealth v. Pizarro

723 A.2d 675 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1998

Compare Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Schultz v. Daugherty Refining Co.

130 Pa. Super. 607 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1938

Per Curiam, There is no essential difference in the facts between this case and Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Company, 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 579 . On the authority of that case the judgment must be reversed. … Following the Massett-Armerford case the record will be remitted to the Board to consider and determine that question, in the light, however, of our recent decisions. See Sayre v. Textile Machine Works, 129 Pa.

Waslin v. Conlon Coal Co.

163 Pa. Super. 368 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1948

In Morell v. Buffalo & Susquehanna C. & C. Co., 103 Pa. … In Lewis v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 113 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Ayala

277 Pa. Super. 363 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1980

In Commonwealth v. Laniewski, 427 Pa. 455 , 235 A.2d 136 (1967), the police officer was permitted to transcribe onto a board the contents of bookmaking slips seized from the defendant. … The judge’s determination that *367 it would be helpful for the jury to see the diagram on the board was a proper exercise of that discretion.” Id., 427 Pa. at 460 , 235 A.2d at 139 . See also, Commonwealth v.

Kashoff v. Coat Craft Co., Inc.

154 Pa. Super. 478 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1943

Findings that the disfigurement is serious and permanent and produces an unsightly appearance must be made in the first instance by the board. Simon v. Maryland Battery S. Co., 276 Pa. 473, 475, 476 , 120 A. 469 . … We cannot say that the board’s finding was so arbitrary as to amount to an error of law. *481 Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328 , 24 A. (2d) 51. Order is affirmed.

Bender v. Bender

297 Pa. Super. 461 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1982

Wasiolek v. Wasiolek, 251 Pa.Super. 108 , 380 A.2d 400 (1977) applies in this case. … Kaplan v. Kaplan, 236 Pa.Super. 26 , 344 A.2d 578 (1975).

Wood v. Chester Traction Co.

36 Pa. Super. 483 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1908

Justice Fell, in Bumbear v. … So in Brennan v. Traction Co., 27 Pa.

Davis v. Hartel

56 Pa. Super. 557 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1914

So in White v. … See Swain v.

Loeb v. Mellinger

12 Pa. Super. 592 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 1900

Pugh, 4 W. & S. 445 ; Kuhns v. Gettysburg National Bank, 68 Pa. 445 ; Lerch Hardware Co. v. The Bank, 109 Pa. 240 : Investment Co. v. Russell, 148 Pa. 496 ; Porter v. Gunnison, 2 Gr. 297 . … Justice Trtjnkey said in Maynes v.

O'Toole v. Hughes-Foulkrod Co.

113 Pa. Super. 292 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1934

Board. … As stated in Parlovich v. Phila. & R. C. & I. Co., 76 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Markle

245 Pa. Super. 108 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1976

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 444 Pa. 318 , 282 A.2d 364 (1971). This isolated reference considered in the light of the trial judge’s prompt corrective action could not be said to have prejudiced appellant’s trial.

Sumption v. Rogers

53 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 27, 1913

Ill has been that it is prospective and intended merely to impose limits on future legislation: Evans v. Phillipi, 117 Pa. 226 ; Com. v. Brown, 210 Pa. 29 . … After citing the above cases and quoting the above excerpt from the opinion of Justice Brown in Henry Taylor Lumber Co. v.