Case law

Collins v. Walter C. Best, Inc.

306 Pa. Super. 4 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1982

Essex Intern, Inc., 410 F.Supp. 215 (E.D.Pa.1976); Browne v. Wheel-Horse Products, Inc., 408 F.Supp. 415 (E.D.Pa.1976); Brescia v. Ireland Coffee-Tea, Inc., 412 F.Supp. 488 (E.D.Pa.1976). … See Unora v. Glenn Alden Coal Co., 377 Pa. 7 , 104 A.2d 104 (1954); Woodward v. Pittsburgh Engineering & Construction Co., 293 Pa. 338 , 143 A. 21 (1928); Montgomery v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board, 42 Pa.

Morgan v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc.

204 Pa. Super. 521 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

The court below affirmed the action of the board and dismissed the appeal. The only question before us is whether there is legally competent evidence to support the findings of the board. Urbasik v. Johnstown, 198 Pa. … As the board found for the claimant, we must review the evidence in the light most favorable to the claimant and give her the benefit of all inferences reasonably deductible therefrom. Muir v.

Commonwealth v. Jones

246 Pa. Super. 521 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 31, 1977

See, e. g., Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). I am sure the Court in Swain did not regard its response as final; courts must feel their way in matters of this sort. … In United States v.

Mazzo v. F.W. Woolworth Co., Inc.

139 Pa. Super. 242 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1939

In Wilson v. Adams Express Co., 72 Pa. … See also, Fazio v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co., 321 Pa. 7, 11 , 182 A. 696 ; Lutterschmidt v. Stahlnecker, 307 Pa. 5, 9 , 160 A. 615 ; Charlap v. Lepow, 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 466, 469 ; University Club v. American Mut. L. Ins.

Commonwealth v. Crowley

154 Pa. Super. 116 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1943

Since that time, and pending disposition of the appeal to this court, the decision in West Virginia State Board of Education et al. v. Barnette et al., 319 U. S. 624 , 63 S. Ct. 1178 , 87 L. Ed. 1171 , was rendered. … It is not necessary to inquire whether nonconformist beliefs will exempt from the duty to salute unless we first find power to make the salute a legal duty”: West Virginia State Board of Education et al. v.

Bonomo v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

111 Pa. Super. 402 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1933

On appeal, the court sustained the view taken by the board. … In Piper v. Adams Express Co., 270 Pa. 54 , 62 and 63, 113 A. 562 , quoting Yeager v.

Santiago v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

418 Pa. Super. 178 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 20, 1992

Kuney v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 127 Pa.Cmwlth. 628 , 562 A.2d 931 (1989). … v.

Kutney v. William Penn Colliery Co.

148 Pa. Super. 114 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1941

Counsel for appellants rely upon the general language found in such cases as Consona v. R. E. Coulborne & Co. et al., 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 , 158 A. 300 , and Babcock v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. et al., 137 Pa. … See also Tomlinson v. Hassle Brook Coal Co., 116 Pa.

Bordick v. John Conlon Coal Co.

144 Pa. Super. 522 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1941

Neither the compensation board nor the court below seems to have realized that under the principles announced by our Supreme Court in Lente v. … Compare Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353, 178 A. 317 ; McClelland v. B. & O. R. R. Co., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 158 , 8 A. 2d 498 ; Porto v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co. 137 Pa.

Berkley v. Maurer

41 Pa. Super. 171 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1909

As was said by Justice Woodwaed in Travis v. … Co. v. Hickman, 28 Pa. 318 .

Lambing v. Consolidation Coal Co.

161 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1947

In that case, the employee apparently was injured by a board which fell on his foot and injured his toe. … He was a watchman and there was nothing to show that he had anything to do with the handling of boards.

Commonwealth v. Kleinicke

2006 Pa. Super. 48 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2006

Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), meant that police officers would be required to provide warnings prior to interrogating prisoners, and Brown v. … Brown did not specifically overrule Plessy , yet there was no doubt the logic of Brown forbid the separate but equal doctrine in public transportation cases that followed.

Magill v. Westinghouse Electric Co.

209 Pa. Super. 342 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1967

The Workmen’s Compensation Board and the court below affirmed the award. … Smith v. Pull. Stand. Car Mfg. Co., 194 Pa. Superior Ct. 263 , 166 A. 2d 299 (1960).

Commonwealth v. McMenamin (Et Al.)

122 Pa. Super. 91 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1936

Such bonds shall be filed with and retained by the board. … The form of the bond was prescribed by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board and is identical with that of the bond which we had before us in the case of Com. v. Eclipse Literary and Social Club et al., 117 Pa.

Owatt v. Rodman's Beverage

169 Pa. Super. 339 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

In our view the Board, under the circumstances, is chargeable with an abuse of discretion in refusing a rehearing, as prayed for. Cf. Fronko v. U. S. Sanitary Mfg. Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 636 , 39 A. 2d 363 . … The court, on appeal from that order, also was wrong in affirming the Board, on its conclusion that claimant was barred under the rule of Adamchick v. Wyoming Val. Col. Co., 332 Pa. 401 , 3 A. 2d 377 .

Campbell v. Attanasio

2004 Pa. Super. 446 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 30, 2004

See Jistarri v. … See K.H. v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Friedman v. Friedman

223 Pa. Super. 66 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1972

Coleman v. Coleman, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 256 , 133 A. 2d 307 . In the absence of any legal ground justifying her separation, a wife is not entitled to a support order: Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown, 195 Pa. … Bundy v. Bundy, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 153 , 47 A. 2d 537 (1946). Commonwealth v. McAlaine, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 27 , 163 A. 2d 711 (1960). See, e.g., Fritts v. Fritts, 273 A. 2d 648 (Md. 1971); Gillette v.

Primoli v. Philadelphia Bronze & Brass Corp.

211 Pa. Super. 224 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1967

Similarly, in Agostin v. … Anderson v. Brand, 303 U.S. 95 (1938).

Com. v. Smith, J.

304 A.3d 35 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 2023

On October 7, 2021, Joel Gross, an agent with the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (“the Board”) received an e-mail from a colleague, Agent Liam Sweeney. … Recently, in Commonwealth v. Skipper, 277 A.3d 617 (Pa.

Makar Et Ux. v. Sullivan Trail Coal Co.

135 Pa. Super. 317 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1939

The Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed the referee’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award. … "As was pointed out by this court in Feldman v. [Pictorial Review-Women’s World] Pub. Co. et al., 122 Pa.