Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.53s

  • Hopwood v. Pittsburgh

    152 Pa. Super. 398 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1943

    The weight of his opinion was for the board. … The inferences to be drawn from the evidence were for the board. Ford v. Dick Co., 288 Pa. 140 , 135 A. 903 . The testimony as a whole supports the award.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Richardson

    2001 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2001

    Thus, the issue we are confronted with is whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 9793 applies to all offenses in which a person currently is under the supervision of the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) or under the supervision of the … Board for a Megan’s Law offense.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Krapf v. Arthur

    95 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1928

    The court below reversed the board and referee and entered judgment for the defendant; the present appeal followed. … It was immediately resumed when he boarded the trolley car the next morning (Knorr v. Central R. R. of N. J., supra), because his duty of reporting the results of his trip to the defendant had not been performed.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Foyle v. Commonwealth

    101 Pa. Super. 412 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1930

    In Carville v. … As we said in Lehman v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Repper v. E. Eichelberger & Co.

    120 Pa. Super. 19 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1935

    Superior Ct. 497 ; McKissick v. Penn Brook Coal Co., 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 444 , 168 A. 691 ; and Palino v. Hazle Brook Coal Co., 112 Pa. … Manley v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Meshey

    278 Pa. Super. 73 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 20, 1980

    It has been held that the Court is without power to extend the appeal period absent a showing of fraud or excusable mistake: Commonwealth v. Georgiana, 68 Pa. D&C 2d 307; Commonealth v. Dadey, 54 Pa. D&C 2d 458. … In the case of Commonwealth v. Kauffman, from Lancaster County, the Honorable W. Hensel Brown held that there was no such right and his holding was affirmed Per Curiam by this Court in Commonwealth v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lobdell v. Leichtenberger

    442 Pa. Super. 21 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1995

    Gekas v. … The board of viewers found that the private road was not necessary. The trial court dismissed the petitioner’s exceptions to the board’s report.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Rhone

    422 Pa. Super. 521 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 27, 1993

    Two of the men wore brown hats; one of the hats was identified as a brown jeff cap. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 489 Pa. 285 , 414 A.2d 70 (1980) (issue waived where no request for curative instruction or motion for mistrial).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Ludington v. Russell Coal Mining Co.

    90 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1926

    In the later case of Bausch v. Fidler, App., supra, p. 576, the Supreme Court again referred to the proper construction of paragraph (c) in this language: “As held in Lente v. … This may be under paragraph (a) or (b): Lente v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Gore

    171 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

    McWilliams, 6 Pa. 170, 177 ), or ‘corroborative *13 evidence’ (Com. v. DeCost, 35 Pa. Superior Ct. 88, 95 ; Com. v. Rogo, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 109 ; Com. v. Haines, 130 Pa. … Com. v. Spallone, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 282, 287 , 35 A. 2d 727 ; Com. v. Shadduck, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 376, 380 , 77 A. 2d 673 ; Com. v. Simmons, 361 Pa. 391, 397 , 65 A. 2d 353 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Vesley

    290 Pa. Super. 192 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 1981

    Barraclough v. Atlantic Refining Co., 230 Pa.Super. 276 , 326 A.2d 477 (1976). … See Brown v. Brown, 164 Pa.Super. 350 , 64 A.2d 506 (1949). In the instant case, it is clear that the Appellee made every reasonable and possible effort to commence actual mining operations as soon as possible.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ewing v. Cottman

    9 Pa. Super. 444 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 17, 1899

    Benner, 1 P. & W. 402, and Gleim v. Rise, 6 Watts, 44 . … This case falls within the general principle which forbids a *448 tenant to impeach his landlord’s title: Howard v. Murphy, 23 Pa. 173 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Thompson

    701 A.2d 1367 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 1997

    (citing Commonwealth v. … Brown, who was also assigned to the criminal court, helped with this court’s case list. In the instant case, defendant agreed to be sentenced by Judge Brown.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Springfield Township Highway Department

    202 Pa. Super. 616 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1964

    As the finder of facts, the board had that right. *624 The burden of proving a causal relationship between the accident and the alleged disability is upon the claimant, Ferlazzo v. … , Ferlazzo v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Clader v. Gangewere

    63 Pa. Super. 174 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1916

    Quartz Co., 220 Pa. 548 ; Demby v. Atkins, 61 Superior Ct. 538. The runway, from Fetter’s testimony, was properly constructed. … It was of two board thickness ; there were knots in the boards, but the plaintiff in describing his accident, states that he did not fall through the runway that had two board thickness, but fell where there was one board

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • La Rossa v. Forte Et Ux.

    92 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1927

    L. 193, if brought on behalf of the City *454 of Philadelphia, (Brice’s Appeal, 89 Pa. 85 ; Zimmerman v. Building Inspectors, 19 Phila. 341 , 5 Pa. Co. Ct. Rep. 520 ; Phila. v. Brown, 20 Phila. 326 , 9 Pa. Co. Ct. … The construction of the act has been otherwise: see opinion by Mitchell, J., in Zimmerman v. Building Inspectors, supra, and by Wilson, J., in Phila. v. Brown, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Siderio Unemployment Compensation Case

    168 Pa. Super. 642 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

    The Board properly found him ineligible under the circumstances. As to the reasons for claimant’s severance from his employment with the Sun Company, his base year employer, the Board made the following findings: “3. … Hall v. Unem *645 ployment Comp. Bd. of Rev., 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 65 , 49 A. 2d 872 . The question of a capricious disregard of other competent evidence under the rule of Tronieri Unempl. Compensation Case, 164 Pa.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Petrusko v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co.

    109 Pa. Super. 288 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1933

    The controlling findings of the board read: “3. … The facts, as found by the fact finding tribunal, clearly distinguish the case at bar from that of Zionek v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 105 Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Allen v. France Packing Co.

    170 Pa. Super. 632 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

    Trust & Saving Fund Company v. Record Pub. Co., 227 Pa. 235 , 75 A. 1067 ; Landis v. Brick & Tile Co., 87 Pa. Superior Ct. 398 ; Cf. McCay v. Luzerne & Carbon Co. M. T. Co., 125 Pa. … Corp. v. Lineinger, 341 Pa. 364 , 19 A. 2d 478 . Culp v. Independ. Card Corp., 99 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Luongo Unemployment Compensation Case

    200 Pa. Super. 562 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1963

    The board found that “The work the claimant did for S. J. … The facts are for the *567 board. Unemployment Compensation Law §510, 43 P.S. §830; Ristis Unemployment Compensation Case, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 400, 403 , 116 A. 2d 271 (1955); Progress Mfg. Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.