Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

3.05s

  • Urban v. Nanticoke City

    111 Pa. Super. 195 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1933

    to pay her board and care. … Hall *199 man v. Starr Printing Co., 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 563 ; McGuire v. James Lees & Son, 273 Pa. 85 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • John & Mary Breslin v. Susq. Col. Co.

    107 Pa. Super. 449 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1932

    Ford v. Dick, 288 Pa. 140 . We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the referee or the board, as the compensation act has delegated to them the exclusive function; of determining these facts. … Morris v. Yough Coal and Supply Co., 266 Pa. 216 ; Todd et ux., v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 297 Pa. 302 . As stated by the lower court, Morganuoth, P.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sorby v. Three Rivers Motors

    178 Pa. Super. 187 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1955

    Her theory is that the Board should have, but did not, draw such inference. With this we cannot agree. The inference is merely permissive, not conclusive (Hall v. … Ferne v. Chadderton, 363 Pa. 191 , 69 A. 2d 104 . At the very least, the evidence was equally accessible to both parties. Moseley v. Reading Co., 295 Pa. 342 , 145 A. 293 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Culver v. Port Allegany Reporter Argus

    409 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1991

    In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. … The same rule is applicable to media dissemination of matters disclosed at public meetings of local school boards. There can be no liability for accurately and truthfully publishing such information. See also: Smith v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Hardy

    2007 Pa. Super. 398 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007

    Having been a Board member of a variety of organizations ..., [I know] Board members need energy to do the things that they do for the Board. … Appellant constitutional challenge invokes Blakely v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • McDevitt v. Precision Manufacturing Co.

    176 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1954

    On appeal the Court of Common Pleas sustained the board. … Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Company, 147 Pa.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Bloom v. Pike Township School District

    162 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1947

    The court set aside the verdict and entered judgr ment for defendant n. o. v. … Superior Ct. 277, 280, 281 ; Wattman v. Albany Twp. School District, 64 Pa. Superior Ct. 458 . *153 When “an acceptable qualified teacher” became obtainable, the school board had no choice in the matter.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Treaster v. North American Refractories Co.

    156 Pa. Super. 567 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1944

    Smith v. Wm. Hodges & Co., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 14 , 28 A. 2d 719 . … This Court in Stauffer v. Hubley Mfg. Co., 151 Pa.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

    107 Pa. Super. 360 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1932

    Superior Ct. 1 ; Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 . … As stated in the Higgins and Roeschen cases, supra, failure to appeal from an adverse finding of a referee, or the board, does not preclude a party from petitioning the board for appropriate action by it under Sec. 413, provided

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Egan v. City of Philadelphia

    113 Pa. Super. 93 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1933

    See Callahan v. Philadelphia et al. 312 Pa. 40 , 167 A. 293 . … A period of thirty days also seems to be ample time for the making and disposition of charges before the police board of investigation, or any other similar board in any department.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Berkstresser v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

    140 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1940

    Shetina v. Pittsburgh Term. Coal Corp., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 113, 114 , 173 A. 727 . … Superior Ct. 598, 600, 601 , 159 A. 79 ; Borneman v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 395, 396 , 186 A. 223 . We pointed out in Shetina v. Pittsburgh Term. Coal Corp., 114 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Foster v. State College Borough

    124 Pa. Super. 492 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1936

    After taking additional testimony the board made, inter alia, the following findings of fact: “4. … In Murphy v. Phila. & R. C. & I. Co., 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 109 , a miner whose left side was paralyzed while shoveling coal a distance of ten feet, over a five foot board partition, was held entitled to compensation.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Keifer v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

    102 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1930

    Attention should be directed to the fact that the decisions of the referee and board and of the court below were all made prior to the filing of the opinions of this court in the cases of Johnson v. … Superior Ct. 94 , and DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Company and Travelers Insurance Company, 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 497 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Snyder's Estate

    14 Pa. Super. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1900

    In McLanahan v. … See also Mellon’s Appeal, 46 Pa. 165, 175 ; Wertz’s Appeal, 69 Pa. 173 , and Davis’s Appeal, 83 Pa. 353 ; Watters v. Steele, 11 Pa. Superior Ct. 303 . In referring to the case of McLanahan v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Edmiston v. Wolf, Sheriff

    134 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1938

    Superior Ct. 262 , 195 A. 782 ) ; that, unless it can be said that there is no competent evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the referee and board, they cannot be disturbed (Johnson v. … In support thereof it cites: Zenker v. Zenker et al., 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 255 ; Boal v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 237 , 193 A. 341 ; Freeman v. Salem Reformed Church et al., 125 Pa.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.

    157 Pa. Super. 311 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1945

    On appeal, the County Court of Allegheny County reversed the board and entered judgment in favor of the claimant. … Compensation Board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.”

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • In the Interest of S.T.S., Jr.

    2013 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2013

    V. … In Commonwealth v.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Johnson

    24 Pa. Super. 490 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1904

    , and on October 29, 1901, the board issued to the Caxton Company three orders aggregating the named amount, all of which were signed by the president and attested by its secretary. … See Douglass v. McLean and Com. v. Sholtis filed herewith. The judgment is affirmed and mandamus directed to issue unless other legal grounds be shown why it should not.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Orosky v. American Window Glass Co.

    162 Pa. Super. 195 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1947

    The board found the total basic annual expense of the Orosky family was $1247.00. … Smitti v. Roth Cadillac Co., 145 Pa. Superior Ct. 292 , 21 A. 2d 127 ; Bucci v. Lincoln Coal Company, 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 14 A. 2d 359 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Galloway

    238 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1975

    Brown v. Court of Common Pleas Second Judicial District, No. 207 Misc. Docket No. 20 (1974). … Commonwealth v. Goins, 457 Pa. 594 , 321 A.2d 913 (1974); Commonwealth v. Trunk, 311 Pa. 555 , 167 A. 333 (1933) ; Commonwealth v. Stallone, 281 Pa. 41 , 126 A. 56 (1924).

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.