Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
3.05s
111 Pa. Super. 195 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1933
to pay her board and care. … Hall *199 man v. Starr Printing Co., 70 Pa. Superior Ct. 563 ; McGuire v. James Lees & Son, 273 Pa. 85 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedJohn & Mary Breslin v. Susq. Col. Co.
107 Pa. Super. 449 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1932
Ford v. Dick, 288 Pa. 140 . We cannot substitute our judgment for that of the referee or the board, as the compensation act has delegated to them the exclusive function; of determining these facts. … Morris v. Yough Coal and Supply Co., 266 Pa. 216 ; Todd et ux., v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 297 Pa. 302 . As stated by the lower court, Morganuoth, P.
Cited 4 timesPublished178 Pa. Super. 187 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 25, 1955
Her theory is that the Board should have, but did not, draw such inference. With this we cannot agree. The inference is merely permissive, not conclusive (Hall v. … Ferne v. Chadderton, 363 Pa. 191 , 69 A. 2d 104 . At the very least, the evidence was equally accessible to both parties. Moseley v. Reading Co., 295 Pa. 342 , 145 A. 293 .
Cited 11 timesPublishedCulver v. Port Allegany Reporter Argus
409 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1991
In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. … The same rule is applicable to media dissemination of matters disclosed at public meetings of local school boards. There can be no liability for accurately and truthfully publishing such information. See also: Smith v.
Cited 3 timesPublished2007 Pa. Super. 398 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 2007
Having been a Board member of a variety of organizations ..., [I know] Board members need energy to do the things that they do for the Board. … Appellant constitutional challenge invokes Blakely v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMcDevitt v. Precision Manufacturing Co.
176 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1954
On appeal the Court of Common Pleas sustained the board. … Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Company, 147 Pa.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBloom v. Pike Township School District
162 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1947
The court set aside the verdict and entered judgr ment for defendant n. o. v. … Superior Ct. 277, 280, 281 ; Wattman v. Albany Twp. School District, 64 Pa. Superior Ct. 458 . *153 When “an acceptable qualified teacher” became obtainable, the school board had no choice in the matter.
Cited 3 timesPublishedTreaster v. North American Refractories Co.
156 Pa. Super. 567 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1944
Smith v. Wm. Hodges & Co., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 14 , 28 A. 2d 719 . … This Court in Stauffer v. Hubley Mfg. Co., 151 Pa.
Cited 9 timesPublishedWilson v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.
107 Pa. Super. 360 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1932
Superior Ct. 1 ; Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 . … As stated in the Higgins and Roeschen cases, supra, failure to appeal from an adverse finding of a referee, or the board, does not preclude a party from petitioning the board for appropriate action by it under Sec. 413, provided
Cited 1 timesPublished113 Pa. Super. 93 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1933
See Callahan v. Philadelphia et al. 312 Pa. 40 , 167 A. 293 . … A period of thirty days also seems to be ample time for the making and disposition of charges before the police board of investigation, or any other similar board in any department.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBerkstresser v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund
140 Pa. Super. 237 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1940
Shetina v. Pittsburgh Term. Coal Corp., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 113, 114 , 173 A. 727 . … Superior Ct. 598, 600, 601 , 159 A. 79 ; Borneman v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 395, 396 , 186 A. 223 . We pointed out in Shetina v. Pittsburgh Term. Coal Corp., 114 Pa.
Cited 6 timesPublishedFoster v. State College Borough
124 Pa. Super. 492 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1936
After taking additional testimony the board made, inter alia, the following findings of fact: “4. … In Murphy v. Phila. & R. C. & I. Co., 98 Pa. Superior Ct. 109 , a miner whose left side was paralyzed while shoveling coal a distance of ten feet, over a five foot board partition, was held entitled to compensation.
Cited 28 timesPublishedKeifer v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co.
102 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1930
Attention should be directed to the fact that the decisions of the referee and board and of the court below were all made prior to the filing of the opinions of this court in the cases of Johnson v. … Superior Ct. 94 , and DeJoseph v. Standard Steel Car Company and Travelers Insurance Company, 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 497 .
Cited 10 timesPublished14 Pa. Super. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 26, 1900
In McLanahan v. … See also Mellon’s Appeal, 46 Pa. 165, 175 ; Wertz’s Appeal, 69 Pa. 173 , and Davis’s Appeal, 83 Pa. 353 ; Watters v. Steele, 11 Pa. Superior Ct. 303 . In referring to the case of McLanahan v.
Cited 0 timesPublished134 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1938
Superior Ct. 262 , 195 A. 782 ) ; that, unless it can be said that there is no competent evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the referee and board, they cannot be disturbed (Johnson v. … In support thereof it cites: Zenker v. Zenker et al., 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 255 ; Boal v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 237 , 193 A. 341 ; Freeman v. Salem Reformed Church et al., 125 Pa.
Cited 4 timesPublishedToffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.
157 Pa. Super. 311 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1945
On appeal, the County Court of Allegheny County reversed the board and entered judgment in favor of the claimant. … Compensation Board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.”
Cited 26 timesPublishedIn the Interest of S.T.S., Jr.
2013 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 15, 2013
V. … In Commonwealth v.
Cited 78 timesPublished24 Pa. Super. 490 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1904
, and on October 29, 1901, the board issued to the Caxton Company three orders aggregating the named amount, all of which were signed by the president and attested by its secretary. … See Douglass v. McLean and Com. v. Sholtis filed herewith. The judgment is affirmed and mandamus directed to issue unless other legal grounds be shown why it should not.
Cited 1 timesPublishedOrosky v. American Window Glass Co.
162 Pa. Super. 195 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1947
The board found the total basic annual expense of the Orosky family was $1247.00. … Smitti v. Roth Cadillac Co., 145 Pa. Superior Ct. 292 , 21 A. 2d 127 ; Bucci v. Lincoln Coal Company, 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 14 A. 2d 359 .
Cited 2 timesPublished238 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1975
Brown v. Court of Common Pleas Second Judicial District, No. 207 Misc. Docket No. 20 (1974). … Commonwealth v. Goins, 457 Pa. 594 , 321 A.2d 913 (1974); Commonwealth v. Trunk, 311 Pa. 555 , 167 A. 333 (1933) ; Commonwealth v. Stallone, 281 Pa. 41 , 126 A. 56 (1924).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna