Case law

Commonwealth v. Aguado

2000 Pa. Super. 293 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2000

Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 436 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). … Commonwealth v.

Eppley v. Eldora Land Corp.

204 Pa. Super. 559 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

Since it is the prerogative of the board to pass on the credibility of the witnesses and to weigh their testimony, the board’s finding that the employer was not Eldora but Lloyd Manges is binding on the court if it is supported … Krasznay v. Milton Ross Metals Co., 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 94 , 203 A. 2d 393 (1964). The board has stated that it found Elwood Burgess and not Lloyd Manges to be credible.

Mager v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

127 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1937

v. … In Lacey v.

Commonwealth v. Miller

455 Pa. Super. 534 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1997

See, e.g., Shapiro v. … Commonwealth v. Duncan, 239 Pa.Super. 539, 549 , 363 A.2d 803, 808 (1976). Similarly, in the recent case of Commonwealth v.

Lyndall v. High School Committee

19 Pa. Super. 232 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1902

We cannot assent *234 to the proposition that the board had not power to suspend her because of her refusal to comply with the regulation above referred to. … the common pleas in holding: “As school directors may, in the exercise of a sound discretion, exclude from the public school pupils who have not been vaccinated, as was decided by the Supreme Court in the case of Duffield v.

Herringshaw v. Travelers Aid Society

206 Pa. Super. 219 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

In Thorn v. Strawbridge & Clothier, 191 Pa. … Guy v. Stoecklin Baking Co., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 38, 47 , 1 A. 2d 839 (1938).

Sandy v. Hazle Brook Coal Co.

138 Pa. Super. 581 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1939

The Workmen’s Compensation Board affirmed the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and award of the referee. On appeal by defendant the court of common pleas affirmeid the board. … See Morris v. Yough *584 Coal & Supply Co., 266 Pa. 216 , 109 A. 914 ; Creasy v. Phoenix Utilities Co., 276 Pa. 583 , 120 A. 659 .

Wm. Shott v. the Hudson Coal Co.

106 Pa. Super. 304 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1932

Opinion by Heller, J., This case is very similar in its facts to the case of *305 Gima v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 288 , just decided. … Violation of these rules by the terms of the Act of Assembly is a misdemeanor: Labuck v. Mill Creek Coal Company, 292 Pa. 284 . The proof is very persuasive that the claimant violated this rule.

Hazle Township Annexation Case

183 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

Co. v. Holcomb, 357 Pa. 514, 518, 519 , 55 A. 2d 534 ; Plum Twp. Annexation Case, supra, pages 380, 381. … Esbenshade v. Dept. of Public Instruction, 181 Pa.

Manzer v. Wycoff

78 Pa. Super. 560 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1922

Norris and Brown, 4 Binney 77; Henderson v. Hays, 2 Watts 148, 150 ; and it is known as “equitable ejectment”: Jones v. Maffet, 5 S. & R. 523; Riel v. … . & R. 297; Brown v. Devitt, 131 Pa. 455, 465 ; Moyer v. Garrett, 96 Pa. 376, 380 . This is also commonly called “equitable ejectment”: Eichelberger v.

Kaplan v. Martin

116 Pa. Super. 390 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1934

constitution and bylaws provision is made for payment of death benefits to the dependents of deceased members, and that the defendant association on or about April 15, 1932 had paid death benefits in the sum of $2,000 to Maude V. … (local union) executive board shall hold meetings between regular meetings of the L. U. It shall have power to take any action that the L.

Martin v. County of Butler

94 Pa. Super. 152 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1928

The mischief intended to be remedied by the act — the “constant temptation to extortion upon the public by the officers” (Schuylkill County v. … Wolfe v. Butler, 99 Pa. 535 .

Commonwealth v. Stevenson

2013 Pa. Super. 73 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2013

Commonwealth v. Otterson, 947 A.2d 1239, 1244 (Pa.Super.2008) (quoting Commonwealth v. Brown, 924 A.2d 1288, 1286 (Pa.Super.2007)). Appellant concedes that the court’s factual findings are supported by the record. … Commonwealth v. Epps, 270 Pa.Super. 295 , 411 A.2d 534, 536 (1979) (citing Commonwealth v. Barky, 476 Pa. 602 , 383 A.2d 526 (1978)). Relying on Commonwealth v.

Adams v. Colonial Colliery Co.

104 Pa. Super. 187 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1931

Susquehanna Coal Co., 262 Pa. 1 ; Dzikowska v. Superior Steel Co., 259 Pa. 578 ; Blouss v. D. L. & W. R. R. Co., 73 Pa. Superior Ct. 95 ; Granville v. Scranton Coal Co., 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 335 ; Bradley v. … Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56, 63 ; Malky v. Kiskiminetas Val. Coal Co., 278 Pa. 552, 555 . It is true that in Kuca v. Lehigh Val.

Ryan v. Press Publishing Co.

93 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1928

On an appeal to the Compensation Board the award was affirmed. … The case of Feketa v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Company, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 231 , is relied on as authority for the decision reached.

Gallagher v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.

72 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

: McCauley v. … While the finding of fact of the referee, affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, in case of a hearing de novo, are conclusive and are not subject to review by the courts, — Messinger v. Lehigh Valley R. R.

Yeadon v. White

36 Pa. Super. 360 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 15, 1908

Opinion by Orlady, J., The defendant, an undertaker, obtained from the board of health of Philadelphia a permit to bury the body of one Mary Walsh, who died in that city. … The reasonableness and propriety for such a requirement is found in Brazier v.

Commonwealth v. Richardson

2001 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2001

Thus, the issue we are confronted with is whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 9793 applies to all offenses in which a person currently is under the supervision of the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) or under the supervision of the … Board for a Megan’s Law offense.

Swaney v. Doumont

44 Pa. Super. 49 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1910

The general rule of the common law is that the landlord’s right to distress for rent extends to furniture leased by the owner thereof to the tenant as a keeper of a boarding house on the demised premises: Myers v. … Middleton, 118 Pa. 546 ; Wanamaker & Brown v. Carter, 22 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 . Neither the relation of landlord and tenant, nor of debtor and creditor was established between Mrs.

Kiely v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

264 Pa. Super. 578 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 1979

V., or in the alternative a new trial for the alleged trial errors. … Citing Lanni v. P. R. R. Co., 371 Pa. 106 , 88 A.2d 887 (1952).