Case law

Culver v. Port Allegany Reporter Argus

409 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1991

In Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. … The same rule is applicable to media dissemination of matters disclosed at public meetings of local school boards. There can be no liability for accurately and truthfully publishing such information. See also: Smith v.

Commonwealth v. Aguado

2000 Pa. Super. 293 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 2000

Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 436 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). … Commonwealth v.

Mager v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

127 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1937

v. … In Lacey v.

Wilson v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

107 Pa. Super. 360 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1932

Superior Ct. 1 ; Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 . … As stated in the Higgins and Roeschen cases, supra, failure to appeal from an adverse finding of a referee, or the board, does not preclude a party from petitioning the board for appropriate action by it under Sec. 413, provided

Commonwealth v. Miller

455 Pa. Super. 534 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 16, 1997

See, e.g., Shapiro v. … Commonwealth v. Duncan, 239 Pa.Super. 539, 549 , 363 A.2d 803, 808 (1976). Similarly, in the recent case of Commonwealth v.

Herringshaw v. Travelers Aid Society

206 Pa. Super. 219 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

In Thorn v. Strawbridge & Clothier, 191 Pa. … Guy v. Stoecklin Baking Co., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 38, 47 , 1 A. 2d 839 (1938).

Hazle Township Annexation Case

183 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

Co. v. Holcomb, 357 Pa. 514, 518, 519 , 55 A. 2d 534 ; Plum Twp. Annexation Case, supra, pages 380, 381. … Esbenshade v. Dept. of Public Instruction, 181 Pa.

Detwiler v. Brumbaugh

441 Pa. Super. 110 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 4, 1995

Foflygen v. R. Zemel, M.D. (P.C.), 420 Pa.Super. 18, 32 , 615 A.2d 1345, 1352 (1992), appeal denied 535 Pa. 619 , 629 A.2d 1380 (1993) citing Valley Forge Towers v. Ron-Ike F. … The limiting nature of Section 4-497 was recognized in Reber v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 101 Pa.

Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.

157 Pa. Super. 311 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1945

On appeal, the County Court of Allegheny County reversed the board and entered judgment in favor of the claimant. … Compensation Board’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order.”

Manzer v. Wycoff

78 Pa. Super. 560 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1922

Norris and Brown, 4 Binney 77; Henderson v. Hays, 2 Watts 148, 150 ; and it is known as “equitable ejectment”: Jones v. Maffet, 5 S. & R. 523; Riel v. … . & R. 297; Brown v. Devitt, 131 Pa. 455, 465 ; Moyer v. Garrett, 96 Pa. 376, 380 . This is also commonly called “equitable ejectment”: Eichelberger v.

Edmiston v. Wolf, Sheriff

134 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1938

Superior Ct. 262 , 195 A. 782 ) ; that, unless it can be said that there is no competent evidence to support the findings and conclusions of the referee and board, they cannot be disturbed (Johnson v. … In support thereof it cites: Zenker v. Zenker et al., 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 255 ; Boal v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 237 , 193 A. 341 ; Freeman v. Salem Reformed Church et al., 125 Pa.

Kaplan v. Martin

116 Pa. Super. 390 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1934

constitution and bylaws provision is made for payment of death benefits to the dependents of deceased members, and that the defendant association on or about April 15, 1932 had paid death benefits in the sum of $2,000 to Maude V. … (local union) executive board shall hold meetings between regular meetings of the L. U. It shall have power to take any action that the L.

Martin v. County of Butler

94 Pa. Super. 152 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1928

The mischief intended to be remedied by the act — the “constant temptation to extortion upon the public by the officers” (Schuylkill County v. … Wolfe v. Butler, 99 Pa. 535 .

Hart's Appeal

131 Pa. Super. 104 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1938

Upon appeal by the bank, the board of revision and appeal reduced the land assessment to $111,750. … Chappell, chairman of the board.

Commonwealth v. Stevenson

2013 Pa. Super. 73 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 5, 2013

Commonwealth v. Otterson, 947 A.2d 1239, 1244 (Pa.Super.2008) (quoting Commonwealth v. Brown, 924 A.2d 1288, 1286 (Pa.Super.2007)). Appellant concedes that the court’s factual findings are supported by the record. … Commonwealth v. Epps, 270 Pa.Super. 295 , 411 A.2d 534, 536 (1979) (citing Commonwealth v. Barky, 476 Pa. 602 , 383 A.2d 526 (1978)). Relying on Commonwealth v.

Ryan v. Press Publishing Co.

93 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1928

On an appeal to the Compensation Board the award was affirmed. … The case of Feketa v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Company, 71 Pa. Superior Ct. 231 , is relied on as authority for the decision reached.

Gallagher v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.

72 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

: McCauley v. … While the finding of fact of the referee, affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, in case of a hearing de novo, are conclusive and are not subject to review by the courts, — Messinger v. Lehigh Valley R. R.

Commonwealth v. Richardson

2001 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 31, 2001

Thus, the issue we are confronted with is whether 42 Pa.C.S. § 9793 applies to all offenses in which a person currently is under the supervision of the Board of Probation and Parole (“Board”) or under the supervision of the … Board for a Megan’s Law offense.

Varner v. Lorain Steel Co.

96 Pa. Super. 336 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1929

This was not sufficient to sustain an award: Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199, 206 ; McCrosson v. Phila. R. T. Co., 283 Pa. 492, 495 ; Johnston v. Payne-Yost Const. Co., 292 Pa. 509, 515 . … Co., supra; Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., supra; Johnston v. Payne-Yost Const. Co., supra.

Ludington v. Russell Coal Mining Co.

90 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1926

In the later case of Bausch v. Fidler, App., supra, p. 576, the Supreme Court again referred to the proper construction of paragraph (c) in this language: “As held in Lente v. … This may be under paragraph (a) or (b): Lente v.