Case law

Barckhoff v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

161 Pa. Super. 146 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1947

Superior Ct. 267 , 48 A. 2d 122 ) and since the board held that it did not meet that burden, the question is whether the board’s findings of fact are consistent with each other and with its conclusion of law and its order … In Babcock v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. et al., 137 Pa.

Birosak v. SHAWNEE INN

198 Pa. Super. 652 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1962

v. … It is for the referee and the board, not the courts, to determine the weight of circumstantial evidence: Kline v. Kiehl, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 392 , 43 A. 2d 616 .

Reiter v. Garman

107 Pa. Super. 269 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1932

It is bnt fair to the board to state that its opinion was filed on April 27,1925, long before the decision of the Supreme Court in McDonald v. … We are not convinced that the evidence requires at our hands a legal conclusion in reversal of the action of the board, as affirmed by the court. See Grailey v. State Workmen’s Ins.

Nordmark v. Indian Queen Hotel Co.

104 Pa. Super. 139 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1931

In Polasky v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co., 82 Pa. … (South v. Denniston, 2 Watts 474 Leech v. Agnew, 7 Pa. 21 ; and Passenger Ry. Co. v. Stutter, 54 Pa. 375 .)

Parzuhoski v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

140 Pa. Super. 179 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1940

The court below, in affirming the award of the board, was of the opinion that this statement of Dr. … See McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 283 Pa. 492, 494, 495 , 129 A. 568 . Judgment is reversed, and the award made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board is set aside (Anderson v.

Commonwealth v. Boyer

236 Pa. Super. 214 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1975

He relies on the recent case of Commonwealth v. Swanger, 453 Pa. 107 , 307 A.2d 875 (1973), to support his position. … This rationale follows that articulated by the Supreme Court of the United States in Terry v.

Grosjean v. Murrell

183 Pa. Super. 530 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Upon appeal the board approved the award. This appeal is from the order of the County Court of Allegheny County affirming the board. … See Huha v. Frick Coke Co., 149 Pa.

Swalm v. J. H. Brokhoff, Inc.

145 Pa. Super. 218 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1941

His testimony was clearly insufficient to support an award: Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co., 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 264 , 3 A. 2d 995 ; Byars v. Howard Cleaners, Inc. et al., 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 188 , 13 A. 2d 883 ; Query v. … it was for the board to decide which conclusion it would adopt: Coder v.

Jenkins v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

126 Pa. Super. 326 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1937

See, also, Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 262 Pa. 1 , 104 A. 801 ; Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 145 , 160 A. 137 . … Furthermore, the board was amply warranted in finding that notice forbidding claimant to ride on a motor was not given to him or posted.

Fehr v. YMCA, Pottsville

201 Pa. Super. 107 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1963

Yodis v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. Co., 269 Pa. 586 , 113 A. 73 (1921). In Hornetz v. Phila. & Reading C. & I. … Imperial Co., supra, 327; Lane v.

Ream v. Saxman Coal & Coke Co.

191 Pa. Super. 408 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

On this issue the court below correctly affirmed the board’s decision. … Hanyok v. Pa. Coal & Coke Corp., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. *411 194 , 38 A. 2d 537 ; Simon v. Fine, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 386 , 74 A. 2d 674 .

Garratt v. McCrady Construction Co.

114 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1934

Several miles from the place where claimant was working the employer maintained a boarding camp for certain of his employees. … See Palko v. Taylor-McCoy C. & C. Co., 289 Pa. 401, 405 ; Shickley v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 274 Pa. 360 ; Stahl v. Watson Coal Co., 268 Pa. 452 ; Maguire v. James Lees & Sons Co., 272 Pa. 85 ; Rotolo v.

Pipa v. Kemberling

126 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1937

Com. ex rel. v. Brown, *Page 301 210 Pa. 29 , 36 , 59 A. 479 . In the present case regard must be had to the character and scope of the legislation embodied in the codes. … Liquor Control Board, 125 Pa. Super. 192 , 189 A. 883 ; Carpenter v. Hutchison, 243 Pa. 260 , 90 A. 154 ; Com. ex rel. v. DeCamp, 177 Pa. 112 , 35 A. 601 ; Provident Life and Trust Co. v.

Chichester School District Division Case

210 Pa. Super. 426 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1967

If approved by such court, the clerk thereof shall certify the regional boundaries contained therein to the county board of elections. … At page 466 of 415 Pa., our Supreme Court quoted from Roman v. Sincock, 377 U.S. 695 , 84 S.

Fisher v. Sweet & McClain

154 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1943

See Baker v. Mitchell, 143 Pa. Superior Ct. 50 , 17 A. 2d 738 . … N. 4; Gerson v. Oil City Trust Co., 28 Dist. 853, 47 Pa. C. C. 476; Shouey v. Shouey, 16 D. & C. 693, 696; Abbott’s Petition, 27 D. & C. 205; Com. v. Betts, 25 Del. 149 . 5 May 23, 1887, P. L. 170; May 1, 1893, P.

Ford-Bey, W. v. Professional Anethesia Services

2023 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2023

See Pa.R.A.P. 313(b); see also Witt v. LaLonde, 762 A.2d 1109, 1110 (Pa. Super. 2000). To establish a collateral order, each of the three requirements must be clearly present. See J.S. v. … Brandywine, L.P. v. Brandywine Village Associates, 260 A.3d 179, 195-96 (Pa.

Rich v. Philadelphia Abattoir Co.

160 Pa. Super. 200 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 2, 1946

Parzuhoski v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 179 , 13 A.2d 879 ; Olsweski v. Lehigh Navigation Coal Co., 145 Pa. Superior Ct. 193 , 20 A. 2d 874 ; Bannon v. Pittsburgh, 145 Pa. … Urbany v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 534, 538 , 13 A. 2d 905 ; Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co. et al., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 266, 272 , 200 A. 224 .

Visnic v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

155 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1944

Defendant’s appeal to the board was dismissed, and this appeal is from the judgment of the court below affirming the order of the board. … See also Hornetz v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 277 Pa. 40 , 120 A. 662 ; Yunker v. W. Leechburg S. Co., 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 220 , 167 A. 443 ; Flowers v. Canuso & Son, 115 Pa.

Ramondo v. Ramondo

169 Pa. Super. 102 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

In McConnell v. … See McCall v. Bell Telephone Co., 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 505, 507 ; Bojarski v. M. F. Howlett, Inc., 291 Pa. 485, 490 , *106 140 A. 544 . The Board’s findings are in conformity with and supported by the testimony.

Kittanning Country Club's Liquor License Case

124 Pa. Super. 582 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1936

L. 1246 (47 PS §744), notice thereof was given to the board, and at this hearing, as well as the subsequent hearings, the petitioner and the board were represented by counsel. That same day, W. M. … Co. v. Moyer, 35 Pa. Superior Ct. 503 ; Tonkonogy v. Levin et al., supra. The second, and the stronger, is, that the Act of 1933, as amended, supra, specifically gives the right of appéal. That right cannot be denied.