Case law

Ballard v. Heppe

403 Pa. Super. 441 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1991

See Clancy v. Recker, 455 Pa. 452 , 316 A.2d 898 (1974) (reference to a plan of lots may clarify the meaning of a restrictive covenant). … Covey v. Gross, 377 Pa.Super. 580 , 547 A.2d 1214 (1988). It is clear that the parties agree that these covenants, if found unambiguous, may be considered both continuing and enforceable. See Grasso v.

Wertheimer v. Morris Haber B. & L. Ass'n

113 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 16, 1933

Defendant’s motion for judgment n. o. v. and for a new trial were dismissed. Hence this appeal. … The doctrine of that case was followed in Lepore v. Twin Cities National Bldg. & Loan Assn., 5 Pa. Superior Ct. 276 , and McGovern v. Cosmopolitan Savings & Loan Assn., 44 Pa.

Muldoon Unemploy. Comp. Case

170 Pa. Super. 625 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

Yellow Cab Company of Philadelphia, Appellant, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued March 24, 1952. July 17, 1952. … Cartwright v. Cartwright et al., 350 Pa. 638, 645 , 40 A. 2d 30 .

Fillman v. W.H. L.C. Wolfe

100 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 30, 1930

It comes rather within the rule of Davis v. Davis, Director General, 80 Pa. *309 Superior Ct. 343; Grobuski v. Shipman Coal Co., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 349 ; Utzman v. Penna. Rubber .Co., 96 Pa. … They were matters for the consideration of the board. The assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed.

Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship & Engine Building Co.

80 Pa. Super. 68 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1922

We all agree there is not sufficient evidence to support the finding of the board, a matter we must determine: Kerwin v. Express Co., 273 Pa. 134, 136 . … Luci, 275 Pa. 217 ; Berskis v. L. V. Coal Co., 273 Pa. 243 ; Quinn v. Ship Building Corp., 77 Pa. Superior Ct. 304 ; Cartin v. Standard Tin Plate Co., 263 Pa. 56 ; Pater v. Superior Steel Co., 263 Pa. 244 ; Chovic v.

Czarnecki Unemployment Compensation Case

185 Pa. Super. 46 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 117, April Term, 1957; Mary B. Merritts v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 126, April Term, 1957; Dorothy Mrena v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 127, April Term, 1957; Margaret Konesky v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, No. 146, April Term, 1957.

Diuguid v. Bethel African Methodist Episcopal Church

119 Pa. Super. 493 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1935

Relying upon Zook v. P. R. R. Co. et al., 208 Pa. 603 , 56 A. 82 , and Katz v. … The burden is on the plaintiff’ ”: Long *496 et al. v. Lehigh Coal & Nav. Co. of New England, 292 Pa. 164, 170 , 140 A. 871 ; see also Davidsville First National Bank v. St.

Commonwealth v. Wood

118 Pa. Super. 269 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1935

Brown, 309 Pa. 515 , 164 A. 726 . In Com. v. … In the more recent case of Com. v.

Steel v. Driver Salesmen's Union Local No. 463

147 Pa. Super. 172 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1941

Wishart, 192 Fed. 453 ; Ritter v. Mutual Life Ins. Co., 169 U. S. 139 , 18 Sup. Ct. 300. In Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Johnson, 254 U. … The only evidence, apparently, before this board was the death certificate.

Commonwealth v. Boerner

281 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1980

Brown, supra. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 259 Pa.Super. 502, 504 , 393 A.2d 938, 939 (1978). When the issue is analyzed in terms of double jeopardy, Commonwelath v.

East Side Democratic Club Liquor License Case

160 Pa. Super. 136 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1946

This appeal was taken by the Liquor Control Board. … Kolish v. Kolish, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 591 , 36 A. 2d 857 ) although our study of this record discloses they are devoid of merit as the evidence was far from substantial, showing but slight, if any, infractions of law.

Massett v. Armerford Coal Mining Co.

82 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1923

Under the theory adopted by the referee and the board it would be possible for this claimant to be twice awarded full compensation for the loss of each of his eyes, a condition which cannot have been intended: Fillip v. … His compensation, therefore, is to be determined under paragraphs (a) and (b) rather than paragraph (c) of the 306th section: Berskis v. L. V. Coal Co., 273 Pa. 243 .

Carter v. VECCHIONE

183 Pa. Super. 595 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Carter, made an inference without proper evidence in the record to support such an inference, and that the referee and the Board disregarded competent testimony.” What we said in Motley v. … Motley v. Braun Construction Co., supra; Yanofchick v. State Workmen’s Ins. Fund, supra.

Commonwealth v. Mueller

153 Pa. Super. 524 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1943

L. 872, and Com. v. Visotsky, 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 86, 88, 89 , 195 A. 148 ; Com. v. Newhart, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 216 ; Com. v. Brink, 49 Pa. Superior Ct. 620 ; Com. v. Ciccone, 85 Pa. Superior Ct. 316 ; Com. v. … We think, in the circumstances of this case, the cross-examination was properly admitted to affect Mary Brown’s credibility.

Schmeck v. Muhlenberg Township School District

60 Pa. Super. 183 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1915

Allegheny County v. Grier, 179 Pa. 639 . … See Canavan v. Paye, 34 Pa. Superior Ct. 91 , and cases there cited. In Byers v. Byers, 208 Pa. 23 , Mr.

Pine Grove Hose, Hook & Ladder Co. No. 1 Liquor License Case

167 Pa. Super. 194 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Commonwealth v. Stofchek, 322 Pa. 513, 521, note 3 , 185 A. 840 . … Reversed; the order of the Liquor Control Board is reinstated. Costs to be paid by appellee.

Simonetti v. School District of Philadelphia

308 Pa. Super. 555 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 13, 1983

As in Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N. … We are, of course, mindful of the proposition that a school board is not the insurer of the safety of students (Ohman v. Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., supra; Cambareri v.

Yahnert v. Logan Coal Company

129 Pa. Super. 528 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1937

Upon appeal to the board the disallowance was affirmed. … In our opinion, the case now at bar falls within the principles laid down in such cases as Gailey v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 286 Pa. 311 , 133 A. 498 ; Flaharty v.

Commonwealth v. Wells

441 Pa. Super. 272 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1995

See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); Commonwealth v. Brown, 388 Pa.Super. 187 , 565 A.2d 177 (1989). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 435 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). There is nothing in the record in the instant case that comes close to shocking our sense of justice. 3 .

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Palmieri v. Ashe, Warden

139 Pa. Super. 425 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1940

L. 864), relator was released on parole by tbe Governor, on recommendation of tbe Board of Trustees of the Penitentiary and the Board of Pardons. … Meinzer v. Smith, 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 250 , 180 A. 179 ) of bis maximum sentence of twenty years imposed on June 29, 1914, and is rightfully detained in custody, and will be until April 29, 1944.