Case law

Walden v. Williams Bros.

167 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Werner v. Allegheny County, 153 Pa. Superior Ct. 10, 14 , 33 A. 2d 451 . … Combs v. Cole Brothers Circus, Inc., 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 346 , 67 A. 2d 791 . But, as said by the Board, deceased “was engaged in preserving or protecting his employer’s property when he met his untimely death.”

Conroy v. Loew's Inc.

102 Pa. Super. 523 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 29, 1931

Morris v. … See also Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa, 56; Corcoran v. *527 Penna. Coal Co., 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 325 ; Faucett v. P. R. T., 89 Pa. Superior Ct. 449 .

In the Interest of DelSignore

249 Pa. Super. 149 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1977

She was in the company of two young men who appeared to be loading something into the trunk of a car, and she was wearing a long brown fur coat. Mrs. … It was brown . N.T. at 11. Mrs.

Puzio v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.

126 Pa. Super. 488 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1937

Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163 , 110 A. 731 ; Loeffler *491 v. Western Electric Co., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 163 A. 322”: Knisely v. Knisely et al., 120 Pa. … This testimony, together with the testimony referring to claimant’s physical condition both before and after the accident, was sufficient to warrant the findings of the referee and board. See Richkowsky v.

Oggier Estate

153 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1943

He agreed to pay her $10.00 a week for room and board, but he later asked her to reduce the amount to $8.00, assuring her that he would take care of her. … Brown Fulton testified that he treated Oggier during the entire time the latter resided with Mrs.

Busch v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

150 Pa. Super. 48 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1942

On appeal by defendant, the board affirmed. … “It has no relation to ‘awards’ made by the referee or the board, following a claim petition filed by the claimant.” Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353, 355 , 178 A. 317 .

Schreiber Unemployment Compensation Case

187 Pa. Super. 135 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1958

The Union filed a charge of unfair labor practice, and later a charge of discrimination, with the National Labor Relations Board, neither of which charges would the Board prosecute. … Reliance is placed on Bonner v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 367 , 40 A. 2d 106 , but that case is not controlling in the instant situation.

Silver Unemployment Compensation Case

167 Pa. Super. 345 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Superior Ct. 435, 436 , 65 A. 2d 426; Kostello v. Kostello, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 194, 196 , 48 A. 2d 25 (a workmen’s compensation case). “Capricious disbelief is not merely disbelieving a witness. … The referee found against the claimant, as did the board.

Prather v. H-K Corp.

282 Pa. Super. 556 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 1, 1980

This case is governed by Gombar v. … See, Bell v.

Rednock v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

132 Pa. Super. 89 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1938

The first question involved is whether the board had jurisdiction to entertain, and conduct hearings under, the petition; if not, the merits of the case become immaterial. … This finding distinguishes the present case from that of Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co. et al., supra.

Commonwealth v. Boerner

281 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 3, 1980

Brown, supra. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 259 Pa.Super. 502, 504 , 393 A.2d 938, 939 (1978). When the issue is analyzed in terms of double jeopardy, Commonwelath v.

Ford-Bey, W. v. Professional Anethesia Services

2023 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 2023

See Pa.R.A.P. 313(b); see also Witt v. LaLonde, 762 A.2d 1109, 1110 (Pa. Super. 2000). To establish a collateral order, each of the three requirements must be clearly present. See J.S. v. … Brandywine, L.P. v. Brandywine Village Associates, 260 A.3d 179, 195-96 (Pa.

Garratt v. McCrady Construction Co.

114 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1934

Several miles from the place where claimant was working the employer maintained a boarding camp for certain of his employees. … See Palko v. Taylor-McCoy C. & C. Co., 289 Pa. 401, 405 ; Shickley v. Phila. & Reading Coal & Iron Co., 274 Pa. 360 ; Stahl v. Watson Coal Co., 268 Pa. 452 ; Maguire v. James Lees & Sons Co., 272 Pa. 85 ; Rotolo v.

Commonwealth v. Schulhoff

218 Pa. Super. 209 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1971

On the sufficiency of the evidence, the decision of our Supreme Court in the recently decided case of Commonwealth v. Tirpak, 441 Pa. 534 , 272 A. 2d 476 (1971), is controlling. … Wright, P, J., would affirm on the opinion of Brown, J.

Grosjean v. Murrell

183 Pa. Super. 530 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Upon appeal the board approved the award. This appeal is from the order of the County Court of Allegheny County affirming the board. … See Huha v. Frick Coke Co., 149 Pa.

O'Brien, J. v. Beatty, K.

329 A.3d 685 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2024

The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“Disciplinary Board”) reviewed the recommendation and increased the sanction to a two-year suspension. … See Pollina v. Dishong, 98 A.3d 613, 617 n.3 (Pa.

Jacamino v. Harrison Motor Freight Co.

135 Pa. Super. 356 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1938

The trial, before Brown, Jr., J., and a jury, resulted in a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,000, but defendant’s motion for judgment in its favor, n. o. v., was granted and plaintiff now appeals. … In Collins v.

Ream v. Saxman Coal & Coke Co.

191 Pa. Super. 408 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

On this issue the court below correctly affirmed the board’s decision. … Hanyok v. Pa. Coal & Coke Corp., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. *411 194 , 38 A. 2d 537 ; Simon v. Fine, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 386 , 74 A. 2d 674 .

Safin v. Jones Laughlin Steel Corp.

166 Pa. Super. 142 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1949

In Roschak v. Vulcan Iron Works, 157 Pa. Super. 227 , 42 A.2d 280 , death was "predominantly" caused by anthraco-silicosis and tuberculosis played only a very small part. In Anderson v. … In Oskin v. Wheeling Steel Corp., 162 Pa. Super. 568 , 60 A.2d 424 , although claimant had arthritis the consensus of the medical testimony was that his total and permanent disability was due to silicosis. In Holahan v.

City of Allentown v. Wagner

27 Pa. Super. 485 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1905

Corps, sec. 565, 4th ed; Bank of Augusta v. Earle, 38 U. S. 519, 584 ; Runyan v. Coster, 38 U. S. 122 , 129; Elizabethtown v. Brockville, 10 Ont. 372; Houghton Common Council v. … In Commonwealth v.