Case law

Boyle v. Mill Creek Coal Co.

138 Pa. Super. 347 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1939

See Bogdon v. Susquehanna, Collieries Co., 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 491 , 170 A. 405 ; Nigbrowich v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 532 , 200 A. 282 ; Bednock v. Westmoreland Coal Co., 132 Pa. … On July 12, 1933, the claimant stated that he sent a petition to the board and, as he received no acknowledg *350 ment of its receipt, sometime in 1934, no month being mentioned, he forwarded another petition to the board

Kurniker v. Kurniker

54 Pa. Super. 196 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1913

Tjhe mutual consent that will prevent a divorce upon the ground of desertion may be inferred from the conduct of the parties, and need not be put in the form of a solemn written agreement:” Olson v. Olson, 27 Pa. … Superior Ct. 128 ; King v. King, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 33 ; Thompson v. Thompson, 50 Pa. Superior Ct. 159 .

Philadelphia v. Madden

202 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1963

Contracts, §305, and Warren-Ehret v. Byrd, 220 Pa. 246 (1908). … Philadelphia v. Sam Bobman Department Store Co., supra. 4.

Black Et Ux. v. Cinquegrani Ex Ux.

163 Pa. Super. 157 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1948

See also Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board v. Publicker Commercial Alcohol Co., 347 Pa. 555 , 32 A. 2d 914 . … Lester v. Century Ind. Co., 356 Pa. 15 , 50 A. 2d 678 ; Colonial Mfg. Co. v. Carideo, 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 485 , 16 A. 2d 731 .

Psinakis v. Psinakis

177 Pa. Super. 250 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

(Emphasis added) Brown, Pa. Evid. p. 251. This rule, like many similar ones, is not difficult to state but extremely difficult to apply. President Judge Rice, in Keating v. Nolan, 51 Pa. … Evid. 4th Ed., Sec. 776; Brown, Pa. Evid. p. 251. *253 Where the sole issue is payment, the survivor, in our opinion, is incompetent to testify after the death of the opposite party that he has not been paid. Lahey v.

Wynnewood Civic Ass'n v. Lower Merion Township

175 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1954

After ruling of the Board aggrieved parties may appeal to the Court of Common Pleas. Since the appellant has leaned so heavily upon Taylor v. … Old York Road Club, 318 Pa. 346 , 178 A. 3 (1935), and Young v. Board of Adjustment of Wilkinsburg Borough, 349 Pa. 450 , 37 A. 2d 714 (1944). Unlike Taylor v.

Crimlisk v. Philco Corp.

162 Pa. Super. 162 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1947

The weight of the medical testimony was wholly for the board, Baughman v. Hockensmith, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 314 , 44 A. 2d 764 . Appellant’s contention that Dr. … In that respect there was a mutual mistake of fact existing at the time the receipt was signed and the board properly concluded that the case was ruled by Ralston v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, 156 Pa.

Coble v. Metal Township School District

178 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Com. v. Bacon, 6 S. & R. 322; Koontz v. Franklin County, 76 Pa. 154 . … Emery v. Steckel, 126 Pa. 171 , 17 A. 601 .”

Fegan v. MacCabees

133 Pa. Super. 333 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1938

In Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co., 104 Pa. … It is not our duty to balance the evidence but we must determine whether there was any evidence to sustain the findings of the board and if so, we are bound thereby: Slemba v. Hamilton & Sons, 290 Pa. 267 , 138 A. 841 .

Osser v. City of Philadelphia

295 Pa. Super. 447 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 1982

. § 704(a); Pa.R.A.P. 741(a); see Jost v. Phoenixville Area School District, 267 Pa.Super. 461, 465, n. 1 , 406 A.2d 1133, 1135, n. 1 (1979); see also Commonwealth v. … See, e.g., Miller v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State Employees’ Retirement Board, - Pa. -, 445 A.2d 88 (1981) (opinion in support of affirmance by O’Brien, C.

Commonwealth v. 1978 Toyota

321 Pa. Super. 549 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1983

Bar Corp. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 480 Pa. 322 , 390 A.2d 163 (1978) is instructive. Several employees of the V.J.R. … Nevertheless, the Liquor Control Board fined the V.J.R. Bar Corporation.

Isaacs v. Isaacs

149 Pa. Super. 508 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1941

Matchin v. Matchin, 6 Pa. 332, 337 ; Randolph v. Randolph, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 377, 378 ; Morse v. Morse, 81 Pa. Superior Ct. 602, 603 . … Lisle v. Lisle, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 533 , 194 A. 207; Brown v. Brown, 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 74 , 183 A. 90 .

Commonwealth v. 84-QT. BTLS. Bianco DiVerona Wine

250 Pa. Super. 544 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1977

See Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. One 1959 Chevrolet Impala Coupe, 201 Pa.Super. 145 , 191 A.2d 717 (1963); Commonwealth v. One 1939 Cadillac Sedan, 158 Pa.Super. 392 , 45 A.2d 406 (1946); Commonwealth v. One Dodge Sedan, 141 Pa.

Cammie v. I. T. E. Circuit Breaker Co.

151 Pa. Super. 246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1942

It is true that after the Act of 1939, the board in John Plichter v. A. … The consistent construction placed upon this statute by an administrative board charged with its execution, while not controlling, is entitled to great weight: Grant, Hutcheson Co. v. Penna.

Commonwealth v. Hodge

441 Pa. Super. 653 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 8, 1995

In Commonwealth v. Brown, 538 Pa. 410, 434-438 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1189-1191 (1994), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court made clear that challenges to the weight of the evidence must first be presented to the trial court. … Brown, supra at 438, 648 A.2d at 1191 , quoting Commonwealth v. Nelson, 514 Pa. 262 , 271 n. 3, 523 A.2d 728 , 733 n. 3 (1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 928 , 108 S.Ct. 293 , 98 L.Ed.2d 253 (1987) (citations omitted).

Thomas v. Bache

155 Pa. Super. 224 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1944

This fundamental principle was not observed by the board. Some of the board’s substituted findings were opposed to the facts stipulated of record. … Mulholland & Gotwals, 290 Pa. 341 , 138 A. 855 ; Sechrist v. Kurtz Bros., supra, p. 218; Lecker v. Valentine, 286 Pa. 418 , 133 A. 792 . The board based its action very largely on Mr.

Swartz v. Swartz

456 Pa. Super. 16 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1997

In Brown v. … Brown, 435 A.2d at 861 .

Commonwealth v. Schulhoff

218 Pa. Super. 209 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1971

On the sufficiency of the evidence, the decision of our Supreme Court in the recently decided case of Commonwealth v. Tirpak, 441 Pa. 534 , 272 A. 2d 476 (1971), is controlling. … Wright, P, J., would affirm on the opinion of Brown, J.

Commonwealth v. Davenport

286 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1981

In Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578 , 342 A.2d 84, 90 (1975). In the case at bar, the testimony of the victim, Thomas Davis, was necessary to “complete the picture” of what transpired on the night of October 20,1978.

Commonwealth v. Cheatham

419 Pa. Super. 603 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1992

Schulhofer, Criminal Law and its Processes, p. 195 (Little, Brown and Co. 1989). The case most often cited is People v. Decina, 2 N.Y.2d 133 , 157 N.Y.S.2d 558 , 138 N.E.2d 799 (1956). … Section 1518(b) requires: All physicians and other persons authorized to diagnose or treat disorders and disabilities defined by the Medical Advisory Board shall report to the department, in writing, the full name, date of