Case law

Niemi v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

154 Pa. Super. 600 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 1944

Serafini v. West End Coal Co., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 476, 480, 481 , 200 A. 245 ; see also Fisher v. Sweet & McClain, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 216, 223 , 35 A. (2d) 756. … Lente v. Luci, 275 Pa. 217 , 119 A. 132 ; Priorello v . State Workmen’s Ins. Fund et al., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 373 , 2 A. (2d) 864.

Morris v. Coal Min. Co. of Graceton

164 Pa. Super. 220 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1948

The board refused to take the additional testimony. … In Griffiths v.

Geiser Manufacturing Co. v. Frankford Township

40 Pa. Super. 97 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1909

was not in session:” Weir v. … “The record of a public board cannot be collaterally attacked by the oral impeaching testimony of its secretary:” State v. Main, 69 Conn. 123 . To the same effect are People v. Madison County, 125 Ill. 334 ; Morrison v.

Drolles Unemployment Compensation Case

181 Pa. Super. 575 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

Superior Ct. 355 , 71 A. 2d 837 ; McGuire v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 467 , 82 A. 2d 324 ; Buletza Unemployment Compensation Case, 174 Pa. … This Court held that the board had not erred in concluding, as here, that claimant was disqualified under section 402 (b).

Foelner v. Sulkin

61 Pa. Super. 621 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1915

is true, a conflict of testimony; but according to the great weight of authority a mere conflict of testimony was not alone a sufficient reason for the admission of the defendant’s prior unsworn statements: Commonwealth v. … The leading Pennsylvania cases on the subject are collected in Commonwealth v. Kay and the subject was again discussed in Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 470 ; and later very elaborately reviewed in Lyke v.

Sustar v. Penn Smokeless Coal Co.

85 Pa. Super. 531 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1925

Luci, 275 Pa. 217, 220 ; Bausch v. Fidler, 277 Pa. 573, 576 . … , dependent on the extent of the injury, “not to exceed one hundred and fifty weeks”: Simon v.

Giammaria Liquor License Case

166 Pa. Super. 263 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 14, 1949

Citing Lansdowne Board of Adjustment's Appeal , 313 Pa. 523 , 525 , 170 A. 867 , we further said (p. 556): "Any interest which appellant had in the outcome of the proceedings before the board was not direct and *Page 266 … In Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference et al. v. Pennsylvania Milk Control Commission et al. , 360 Pa. 477 , 483 , 62 A.2d 9 , Mr.

Giammaria Liquor License Case

166 Pa. Super. 263 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1950

In Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference et al. v. Pennsylvania Milk Control Commission et al., 360 Pa. 477, 483 , 62 A. 2d 9 , Mr. … Board made no findings on this, nor did it predicate its action on this feature.

Commonwealth v. Sartin

708 A.2d 121 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 26, 1998

Eagen and the Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (“the Disciplinary Board”). Because we conclude that the order in question is not immediately appealable, we quash the Newspapers’ appeal. … See Commonwealth v. Johnson, — Pa. -, -, 705 A.2d 830, 834 (1998); Watson v. City of Philadelphia, 665 A.2d 1315, 1317 (Pa.Cmwlth.1995). The collateral order rule, first announced in Cohen v.

Drain v. Covenant Life Insurance

454 Pa. Super. 143 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1996

Moy v. … Finally, the allegation that the board failed to obtain an outside fairness opinion on the proposed merger is insufficient to establish fraudulent conduct on the part of the board. See generally Smith v.

Zitelli v. Dermatology Education & Research Foundation

409 Pa. Super. 219 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 1992

Sabino v. Junio, 441 Pa. 222, 225 , 272 A.2d 508, 510 (1971) (emphasis in original). … Northwestern National Bank v. Commonwealth, 345 Pa. 192 , 27 A.2d 20 (1942). While Dr.

Commonwealth v. Nation

409 Pa. Super. 495 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1991

Lattimore v. … Coades v.

Cohen v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education

299 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 1982

Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 39 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 200, 202 , 395 A.2d 622, 623 (1978) (same) (panel case); North Star School District v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 35 Pa. … Accord, Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Greater Johnstown Area Vocational-Technical School, 48 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 604, 610 , 410 A.2d 1290, 1293 (1980); Oxford Board of School Directors v.

Rednock v. Westmoreland Coal Co.

132 Pa. Super. 89 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1938

The first question involved is whether the board had jurisdiction to entertain, and conduct hearings under, the petition; if not, the merits of the case become immaterial. … This finding distinguishes the present case from that of Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co. et al., supra.

Butler v. United States Steel Corp.

205 Pa. Super. 508 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1965

Ciabattoni v. Birdsboro St. F. & M. Co., 386 Pa. 179 , 125 A. 2d 365 (1956); Sierzega v. U. S. Steel Corp., 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 531 , 205 A. 2d 696 (1964); Roschak v. Vulcan Iron Works, 157 Pa. … DeMascola v. Lancaster, 200 Pa. Superior Ct. 365 , 189 A. 2d 333 (1963).

Commonwealth v. One 1940 Chevrolet Station Wagon

159 Pa. Super. 615 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 9, 1946

In Commonwealth v. One Dodge Sedan, 141 Pa. … In Commonwealth v. One 1939 Cadillac Sedan, 158 Pa.

Ruf v. Ruf

168 Pa. Super. 632 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

The boarding house venture was unsuccessful, and the wife, again over the plaintiff’s objection, rented another boarding house. In 1935 the husband went to Florida in an unsuccessful attempt to obtain employment.-. … Upon his discharge on March 12, 1938, he did not return to the boarding house, but went to a friend’s home. .

Holobinko v. Moshannon Smithing Coal Co.

145 Pa. Super. 489 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1941

In Adamchick v. … Red rick v. Knapp Bros. Co. et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 92 , 193 A. 117 ; Seko v. Hub Knitting Co. et al., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 309 , 16 A. 2d 138 . See, also, Welchlin v.

Spencer v. Feitelson & Sons

158 Pa. Super. 410 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 19, 1945

This court, in Sharpe v. Federal Window and Office Cleaning Co., 144 Pa. … The board refused to credit this testimony, and her credibility was for the board to determine.

Silver Unemployment Compensation Case

167 Pa. Super. 345 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Superior Ct. 435, 436 , 65 A. 2d 426; Kostello v. Kostello, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 194, 196 , 48 A. 2d 25 (a workmen’s compensation case). “Capricious disbelief is not merely disbelieving a witness. … The referee found against the claimant, as did the board.