Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.40s
121 Pa. Super. 32 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1935
Upon tbe appeal to tbe compensation board tbe findings of tbe referee were reversed and tbe board held that Monacelli was not an independent contractor and claimant was in tbe employ of James Gallagher, Inc., and awarded … An employee’s engagement is casual in character When it comes about by chance, fortuitously and for no fixed duration of time: Blake v. Wilson, supra.
Cited 10 timesPublishedPetroski v. Piasecki Aircraft Corp.
213 Pa. Super. 142 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1968
See, e.g., Moore v. MacArthur Pile Corp., 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 512, 165 A. 2d 275 (1960). “Nor is the Board required to accept the testimony of any witness, even though the testimony is uncontradicted.” Lowery v. … In Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp., 184 Pa.
Cited 0 timesPublishedText from a scanFulwiler v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.
137 Pa. Super. 421 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1939
Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co. et al., 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 111 , 190 A. 343 ; Palko v. Taylor-McCoy Coal & Coke Co., 289 Pa. 401, 404 , 137 A. 625 . … Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. et al., 286 Pa. 199, 206 , 133 A. 256 ; Paulin v. Williams & Co., Inc., et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 462, 466 , 186 A. 415 , 327 Pa. 579 , 195 A. 40 .
Cited 4 timesPublished2008 Pa. Super. 200 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 29, 2008
Commonwealth v. … Brown , at 591, 927 A.2d at 493 .
Cited 12 timesPublishedGraul Unemployment Compensation Case
159 Pa. Super. 549 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1946
The Board of Review affirmed the referee’s decision. This appeal followed. … The order of the Board of Review is affirmed at appellant’s costs.
Cited 3 timesPublishedGraham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.
122 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1936
An additional ground considered by the board need not be discussed. … L. 642, 669,) the referee, disregarding everything this court said, more than a year before that time, in Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 165 , 164 A. 731 ; Bucher v. Kapp Bros, et al., 110 Pa.
Cited 47 timesPublished309 Pa. Super. 300 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1983
Commonwealth v. Evans, 489 Pa. 85 , 413 A.2d 1025 (1980); Commonwealth v. Pittman, 295 Pa.Super. 234 , 441 A.2d 436 (1982). … Roberts in Commonwealth v.
Cited 0 timesPublished134 Pa. Super. 167 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1938
As was said in Gairt v. … See Miraglia v. Publicker Com. Al. Co., 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 487 , 174 A. 16 ; Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 , 178 A. 317 .
Cited 8 timesPublished37 A.3d 1246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2011
37 A.3d 1246 (2011) COM. v. BROWNE. No. 157 WDA 2011. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. October 26, 2011. Affirmed Petition to Withdraw as Counsel Granted.
Cited 0 timesPublished30 Pa. Super. 298 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1906
Brown, the said George B. … Brown had authority to make such a purchase and bind by the contract Hetty A. Williams jointly with herself, under the provisions of their written agreement: Duncan v. Hartman, 143 Pa. 595 . What Sarah W.
Cited 0 timesPublished79 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922
When the parties state the facts that which is not expressly agreed upon and set forth in a case stated must be taken not to exist: Port Pitt Stamping Co. v. Gas Co., 269 Pa. 162 . … Co. v. Bate, 187 Pa. 460 .
Cited 3 timesPublished177 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1954
The referee found in favor of the claimant, the Board reversed the referee, and the court below reversed the Board. Claimant, a machinist, was injured on October 14, 1941, when struck in the eye by a piece of metal. … Guy v. Stoecklem Baking Co., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 38 , 1 A. 2d 839 .
Cited 13 timesPublished125 Pa. Super. 397 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1936
On appeal to the board, the findings of the referee were affirmed and on appeal to the court of common pleas, the order of the board was affirmed, from which order claimant brings this appeal. … Superior Ct. 536 , 161 A. 622 ; Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 , 178 A. 317 ; Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin S. Corp., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 516 , 180 A. 175 ; Borneman v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 122 Pa.
Cited 4 timesPublishedRolling v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.
136 Pa. Super. 153 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1939
Upon the same evidence, the board, citing and evidently relying upon Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. Co., 297 Pa. 172 , 146 A. 543 , as a modification of the Shoffler case, reversed the referee and made an award. … As illustrations of cases in which the violation of positive orders did not prevent recovery of compensation, see Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 145 , 160 A. 137 , and Walker v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedReichner v. P. Blakiston's Son & Co.
115 Pa. Super. 415 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1934
See Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 141 , 174 A. 919 . … Again, in Kitchen v. Miller Bros.
Cited 18 timesPublished43 Pa. Super. 239 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1910
In Ahl v. … This conclusion in nowise militates against the principle declared in Cushing v. Perot, 175 Pa. 66 , and State Bank of Pittsburg v.
Cited 7 timesPublished2019 Pa. Super. 276 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2019
See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9544(b); see also Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 161 A.3d 960, 965 (Pa. Super. 2017).
Cited 2 timesPublished204 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964
Appellants first question the sufficiency of the preliminary order appointing the board of viewers because it did not specifically direct that board to make a finding of necessity. … Bowers v. Braddock Borough, 172 Pa. 596 , 33 A. 759 (1896).
Superseded on other grounds by Beers v. Raub, 363 Pa. Super. 521 (1987)Cited 19 timesPublishedAllen Unemployment Compensation Case
174 Pa. Super. 514 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 1954
And finally, in her testimony before the Board, she referred to physical ailments brought about by nervous tension as additional reasons' for her ending her employment. … In principle the present case has much in common with Seroskie v. Unemploy. Compensation Board, 169 Pa.
Cited 22 timesPublished2007 Pa. Super. 234 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 6, 2007
Commonwealth v. Miller, 810 A.2d 178, 180 (Pa.Super.2002). In that vein, we may reverse a decision to deny a petition for habeas corpus only when the trial court has committed a manifest abuse of discretion. … See Commonwealth v.
Abrogated on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Dantzler, 2016 Pa. Super. 59 (2016)Cited 6 timesPublished
Ask Donna