Case law

Nu Studio Lounge, Inc. Liquor License Case

215 Pa. Super. 386 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1969

See Commonwealth v. Dawson, 213 Pa. Superior Ct. 747 , 246 A. 2d 886 , allocatur refused 213 Pa. Superior Ct. xlii . … The Board’s enforcement officer testified as follows: “A notice was mailed certified mail on April 6, 1967.

Commonwealth v. Kennedy

309 Pa. Super. 300 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1983

Commonwealth v. Evans, 489 Pa. 85 , 413 A.2d 1025 (1980); Commonwealth v. Pittman, 295 Pa.Super. 234 , 441 A.2d 436 (1982). … Roberts in Commonwealth v.

Maishock v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

129 Pa. Super. 118 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1937

The board affirmed the referee, and the court below affirmed the board and entered judgment for the claimant on the award. The insurance carrier appealed. … See Consona v. R. E. Coulborn & Co. et al., 104 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 , 158 A. 300 ; Jones v. Hazle Brook Coal Co., 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 409 , 179 A. 783 ; Hale v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., supra; Eckley v.

Brovie v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

89 Pa. Super. 503 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 25, 1926

The board found upon the testimony of Dr. … In our opinion this evidence sufficiently meets the requirements laid down in Fink, App., v. Sheldon Axle and Spring Co., 270 Pa. 476, 479 ; Tracey v.

Miterko v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.

201 Pa. Super. 384 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1963

This is a question of fact for the board. We have carefully reviewed the evidence and conclude that un *386 der it the board could decide either for or against the widow-claimant on this point. It found against her. … It should have applied the tests set forth in interpreting §307, supra, in Sheaffer v. Penn Dairies, Inc., 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 583 , 56 A. 2d 368 (1948), and Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Works Co., 136 Pa.

George v. Ellis

2006 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2006

Commonwealth v. … , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e).

Diaz, R. v. Pulia, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2014

, at which the Board granted Edwin R. … Inc. v. Gateway Health Plan, 806 A.2d 443, 447 n. 3 (Pa.Super.2002). Estate of Brown, 30 A.3d at 1204–1205. Herein, Ms.

Arbechesky Unemployment Compensation Case

174 Pa. Super. 217 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1953

On successive appeals both the Referee and the Board of Review affirmed the Bureau. Upon agreed facts the Board found: “10. … Barnes v. Hall, 285 Ky. 160 , 146 S.W. 2d 929 .”

Com. v. Reed, S.

216 A.3d 1114 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 5, 2019

-7 J -S23021-19 Commonwealth v. Brown, 186 A.3d 985, 990-91 (Pa. Super. 2018) (citation omitted). … See Brown, 186 A.3d at 990-91.

Fulwiler v. MacK-international Motor Truck Corp.

137 Pa. Super. 421 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1939

Baumann v. Howard J. Ehmke Co. et al., 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 111 , 190 A. 343 ; Palko v. Taylor-McCoy Coal & Coke Co., 289 Pa. 401, 404 , 137 A. 625 . … Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co. et al., 286 Pa. 199, 206 , 133 A. 256 ; Paulin v. Williams & Co., Inc., et al., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 462, 466 , 186 A. 415 , 327 Pa. 579 , 195 A. 40 .

Pantelis v. Erie Insurance Exchange

2006 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 4, 2006

Brown v. Progressive Ins. … Gardner v. Erie Ins. Co., 555 Pa. 59 , 722 A.2d 1041, 1046-1047 (1999). See also, Hannigan v. Workers’ Comp.

Graul Unemployment Compensation Case

159 Pa. Super. 549 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1946

The Board of Review affirmed the referee’s decision. This appeal followed. … The order of the Board of Review is affirmed at appellant’s costs.

Parisi v. Freedom Oil Co.

150 Pa. Super. 260 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1942

On the above facts found by the referee and adopted by the board, claimant’s employment was not casual in character, and the court below properly so concluded as a matter of law. Callihan v. … It is, in effect, notwithstanding the remittitur to the board, a judgment in favor of claimant and against appellants. See Strickland v. Baugh & Sons Co. et al., 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 273, 282 , 11 A. 2d 547 .

Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.

122 Pa. Super. 579 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1936

An additional ground considered by the board need not be discussed. … L. 642, 669,) the referee, disregarding everything this court said, more than a year before that time, in Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 108 Pa. Superior Ct. 165 , 164 A. 731 ; Bucher v. Kapp Bros, et al., 110 Pa.

Augustine v. Evert Lumber Co.

134 Pa. Super. 167 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1938

As was said in Gairt v. … See Miraglia v. Publicker Com. Al. Co., 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 487 , 174 A. 16 ; Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 , 178 A. 317 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Yambo v. Jennings

220 Pa. Super. 186 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1971

Spader v. Burke, 171 Pa. … Levine v.

Com. v. Browne

37 A.3d 1246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 2011

37 A.3d 1246 (2011) COM. v. BROWNE. No. 157 WDA 2011. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. October 26, 2011. Affirmed Petition to Withdraw as Counsel Granted.

Welch v. Harrigan

79 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922

When the parties state the facts that which is not expressly agreed upon and set forth in a case stated must be taken not to exist: Port Pitt Stamping Co. v. Gas Co., 269 Pa. 162 . … Co. v. Bate, 187 Pa. 460 .

Zerby v. Reading Company

125 Pa. Super. 397 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1936

On appeal to the board, the findings of the referee were affirmed and on appeal to the court of common pleas, the order of the board was affirmed, from which order claimant brings this appeal. … Superior Ct. 536 , 161 A. 622 ; Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 , 178 A. 317 ; Tinsman v. Jones & Laughlin S. Corp., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 516 , 180 A. 175 ; Borneman v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 122 Pa.

Rolling v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co.

136 Pa. Super. 153 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1939

Upon the same evidence, the board, citing and evidently relying upon Dickey v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie R. R. Co., 297 Pa. 172 , 146 A. 543 , as a modification of the Shoffler case, reversed the referee and made an award. … As illustrations of cases in which the violation of positive orders did not prevent recovery of compensation, see Barkanich v. Jeddo-Highland Coal Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 145 , 160 A. 137 , and Walker v.