Case law

Commonwealth v. Curnutte

2005 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2005

See Commonwealth v. … The Board members are appointed by the Governor and overseen by the Board of Probation and Parole. Id. § 9799.3(b),(e).

Commonwealth v. Vega

2000 Pa. Super. 174 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 2000

Commonwealth v. … The PCRA is not the proper vehicle to seek review of the Board’s administrative decisions. See Commonwealth v.

Muir v. Wilson Coal Co.

194 Pa. Super. 487 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1961

As said by the board: “The field notes of the chief . . . are the heart, arteries, and lungs of any survey. … See also Spry v. Polt, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 142 A. 2d 484 ; Mitchell v. Holland Furnace Co., 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 82 , 149 A. 2d 662 . Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth v. Henderson

298 Pa. Super. 180 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1982

In his dissenting opinion, Judge Wieand cites for authority Commonwealth v. Brown, 242 Pa.Super. 240 , 363 A.2d 1249 (1976). We do not find that decision to be persuasive any longer. Our decision in Commonwealth v. … Thus, we are convinced that to the extent that Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, is inconsistent with Commonwealth v. Strader, supra, it has been reversed.

Cavanaugh v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.

125 Pa. Super. 275 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 1936

The workmen’s compensation board reversed the referee and found that the claimant, John J. … In those actions the measure is the loss of earning power (Piper v. Adams Express Co., 270 Pa. 54 , 113 A. 562 ; Yeager v. Anthracite Brewing Co., 259 Pa. 123 , 102 A. 418 ; Leonhardt v.

Savic Ex Rel. Bobic v. Pittsburgh Gas Coal Co.

93 Pa. Super. 494 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1928

It was said in Creasy v. … The decisions in Creasy v. Phoenix Utilities Co., supra; Morris v. Yough Coal and Supply Co., 266 Pa. 216 ; Geytko v. P. & E. Coal Co., 88 Pa. Superior Ct. 522 , and Paraskaiewa Sznitko v.

Borough of Yeadon v. Galen

108 Pa. Super. 114 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1932

L. 330, as amended at various times, does not abrogate or render invalid any portion of the ordinance in question, and that what was said in the case of Yeadon v. White, supra, is applicable to the present case. … The prime reason assigned in support of the decision in the case of Yeadon v.

Commonwealth v. Figueroa

456 Pa. Super. 620 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1997

In addition, appellants rely upon Commonwealth v. … This conclusion cannot be reached at this time and, in fact, recently, in Commonwealth v. Yanoff, 456 Pa.Super. 222 , 690 A.2d 260 (1997), a panel of this Court, relying on Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Kopicz

2003 Pa. Super. 499 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 2003

Commonwealth v. … In Paul P. v.

Estate of Paterno v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n

168 A.3d 187 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 25, 2017

STATE UNIVERSITY, WILLIAM KENNEY, AND JOSEPH V. … Kenney, and Joseph V.

Laubach Realty Co. v. Easton School District

204 Pa. Super. 373 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1964

time schedule] was likewise that of the Board. … Longacre Park Heating Co. v. Delaware County, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 252, 255 , 50 A. 2d 706 (1947). Judgment affirmed.

Kirby v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp.

145 Pa. Super. 121 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1941

In the case of Stauffer v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., *124 116 Pa. … In Seitzinger v.

Vitanza v. Iron City Produce Co.

131 Pa. Super. 441 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1938

The referee and board found that he was and the court below entered a judgment for the claimant on the award of the board for total disability for nine weeks and six days and for partial disability for the balance of the … Also, see Betts v. Amer. Stores Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 452 , 161 A. 589 ; Keck v. John Mullen Const. Co., 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 564 , 173 A. 863 ; Witt v. Witt’s Food Market, 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 557 , 186 A. 275 .

Schmidt v. Schmidt & Erie Railroad

83 Pa. Super. 125 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1924

Co., 220 Pa. 603 ; and Henry Taylor Lumber Co. v. … house; and the claim must only be for the laborer’s own board: Carey v.

Schott v. Pennsylvania Railroad

76 Pa. Super. 582 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1921

The award in favor of tbe claimant in that case, made by tbe Workmen’s Board, was set aside. Tbe latest ease which has been brought to our notice is that of Strohl v. Eastern Penna. … Justice Potter in Dugan v. Coal Co., 241 Pa. 565 : “In the cases of O’Donnell v. R. R. Co., 59 Pa. 239 ; McNulty v. R. R. Co., 182 Pa. 479 , and Goehring v.

Subers Liquor License Case

173 Pa. Super. 558 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

Justice Paxson in Fire Insurance Patrol v. … Com. v. Hicks, 365 Pa. 153 , 74 A. 2d 178 . See Ryder Appeal, 365 Pa. 149 , 74 A. 2d 123 ; Smrekar v. J. & L. Steel Corp., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 183 , 8 A. 2d 461 .

Boyle, E. v. Main Line Health

2025 Pa. Super. 199 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2025

Berkeyheiser v. A-Plus Investigations, Inc., 936 A.2d 1117, 1123-24 (Pa.Super. 2007). See also Farrell v. … Chrysczanavicz v.

Flaherty Unemployment Compensation Case

177 Pa. Super. 572 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1955

Parisi v. Freedom Oil Co., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 260 , 27 A. 2d 255 ; Snavely v. Redemptorist Fathers, 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 625 , 30 A. 2d 724 ; Barnett v. Bowser, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 17 , 106 A. 2d 457 . … Parisi v. Freedom Oil Co., supra. Claimant is not ineligible for benefits on the ground upon which the Board disqualified him.

Acri v. Wintermeyer

285 Pa. Super. 486 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1981

Any party may appeal from the award of a Board of Arbitrators to the Court of Common Pleas. … Gonzales v. Procacio Bros. Trucking Co., 268 Pa.Super. 245 , 407 A.2d 1338 (1979); 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 323 (Supp.1980).

National Realty Appraisal Co. v. Art Club

129 Pa. Super. 99 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1937

Ridley Park Borough v. American Surety Co. of New York, 317 Pa. 263 , 177 A. 9 . See, also, Hess et al. v. Merion Title & Trust Company of Ardmore et al., 317 Pa. 501 , 177 A. 53 ; Russ Soda Fountain Co., Inc., v. … Fritz v. Hathaway, 135 Pa. 274 , 19 A. 1011 ; Parry v. First National Bank of Lansford, 270 Pa. 556, 559 , 113 A. 847 , 848”: National Cash Register Co. v. Ansell et al., supra, 125 Pa.