Case law

Lettrich v. Allegheny Steel Co.

149 Pa. Super. 660 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1942

L. 520, sec. 1, 77 PS 879; Weeks v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. et al., 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 514, 517 , 176 A. 850 . … See McCarthy v. General Electric Co., 293 Pa. 448, 452 , 143 A. 116 ; Royko v. Logan Coal Co. et al., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 449, 463 , 22 A. (2d) 434.

Remo Foresi v. Hudson Coal Co.

106 Pa. Super. 307 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 10, 1932

It is very similar in its basic facts to the eases of Gima v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 288 , and Shott *309 v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 304 , decided at this session. … At first blush, the fifth finding of fact of the Board would seem to justify the award in favor of the claimant and not be subject to review by the court of common pleas or this court, (Labuck v.

Schuey v. Kittanning Borough

72 Pa. Super. 582 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

, on appeal, again found against the claimant, who appealed a second time to the court of common pleas; that court, moved by the opinion of Mestbbzat, J., in Rakie v. … Bolden v.

Troxell v. Shirk

130 Pa. Super. 40 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1937

McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co. et al., 261 Pa. 312 , 104 A. 617 , was cited by the board and by the court below as authority for that proposition. … In McCauley v.

Bun v. Central Pennsylvania Quarry, Stripping & Construction Co.

194 Pa. Super. 630 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1961

In Benko v. Vesta Coal Co., 149 Pa. … See Spry v. Polt, 186 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Randall

183 Pa. Super. 603 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

The board, under this statutory authority, found that the film was “indecent and immoral” and, in the judgment of the board, tended to debase and corrupt morals. … Texas, 343 U.S. 960 ; Winters v. New York, 333 U.S. 507 ; Superior Films, Inc. v. Department of Education, and Commercial Pictures Corp. v. Board of Regents of University of State of New York, 346 U.S. 587 .

Commonwealth v. Messersmith

2004 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 19, 2004

V. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 836 A.2d 989, 992-93 (Pa.Super.2003) (citation omitted), appeal granted, 856 A.2d 831 (Pa. 2004).

Walsh v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

99 Pa. Super. 58 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1930

This award was affirmed by the board, and on appeal, by the common pleas. Section 306 has been considered in many cases, among them, Lente v. Lucci, 275 Pa. 217 ; Simon v. Maryland, etc. Company, 276 Pa. 473 ; Sustar v. … Maryland Battery Company, supra, — is imposed on the referee, or on the board on appeal from the referee; it is finding a fact, as much so as a finding of dependency (Hallman v. Starr Printing Company, 70 Pa.

Hill v. Springfield Township Commissioners

193 Pa. Super. 12 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1960

The burden was on claimant to prove to the satisfaction of the board as a final fact finder that deceased’s death was caused by or resulted from an accident and not from natural causes. Revilak v. … Cope v. Philadelphia, Toilet Laundry & Supply Company, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 205, 208, 74 A. 2d 775 ; Shatto v. Bardinet Exports, Inc., 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 16, 19 , 84 A. 2d 388 .

Commonwealth Ex Rel. O'Neill v. Banmiller

189 Pa. Super. 168 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

the Board of Pardons grant him a commutation. … Salerno v. Banmiller, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 149 A. 2d 501 , and it is not necessary to repeat here what was there said.

Shilko v. Shilko

131 Pa. Super. 395 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 4, 1938

Superior Ct. 424 ; Picciano v. Picciano, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 189, 191 , 168 A. 488 ; Good v. Good, 113 Pa. Superior Ct. 592, 594, 173 A. 430 . … See Brown v. Brown, 124 Pa. Superior Ct. 237 , 188 A. 389 ; Sharp v. Sharp, 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 33 , 161 A. 453 ; Kett v. Kett, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 236 , 177 A. 509 .

Chulick v. Logan Coal Co.

113 Pa. Super. 551 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1934

On appeal the action of the referee was affirmed by the board and that of the board by the court of common pleas. … Following the case of Gima v. Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa.

York & Foster, Inc., Tax Assessment Case

163 Pa. Super. 602 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1948

Section 704 provides that an appeal may be taken from the board to the Court of Common Pleas vithin sixty days after final action by the board. … Carnegie et al., Trustees, v. Pittsburgh Board of Property Assessment, Appeals and Review, 357 Pa. 138 , 53 A. 2d 425 . Appeals dismissed.

Lackner v. Pierre, Inc.

120 Pa. Super. 50 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1935

On an appeal, the court affirmed the board. Our duty is to determine whether the record contains sufficient competent evidence to sustain the finding and conclusion of the board. … Co., 277 Pa. 548 , 122 A. 1 ; Davis v. Davis, 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 343 ; Plour v. P. R. R. Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 ; McCoy v. Spriggs, 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 500 , 157 A. 524 ; Kucinic v. United Eng. & Fdy.

Stohan v. Rockhill Coal & Iron Co.

140 Pa. Super. 146 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1940

L. 186 (77 PS §772) ; Ernst v. Sassaman, 117 Pa. Superior Ct. 353 , 178 A. 317; Zerby v. Reading Co., 125 Pa. … Dist. v. Herzog, 314 Pa. 161 , 171 A. 455 ; Romberger v. Romberger, 290 Pa. 454 , 139 A. 159 ; Twp. Poor Directors v. County Poor Directors, 25 Pa. Superior Ct. 595 ; Simpson’s Estate, 253 Pa. 217 , 98 A. 35 ; Baker v.

McGinley v. Hendershot

65 Pa. Super. 145 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1916

For the successful prosecution of the appellee’s case in the court below, it must appear that his claim is founded on express statutory authority, or arising from a statute by necessary implication: Wayne County v. … While the personnel of the board may change, the board as such is a continuing body, and its orders and directions continue in effect until changed by the board.

Founders Hall Foundation Liquor License Case

205 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1965

J., This is an appeal by the Liquor Control Board from an order of the court below reversing the board and directing it to grant the transfer of a liquor license. … The general standard to be applied in determining whether there has been an abuse of discretion was established by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the case of Mielcuszny v.

Commonwealth v. Curnutte

2005 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 2005

See Commonwealth v. … The Board members are appointed by the Governor and overseen by the Board of Probation and Parole. Id. § 9799.3(b),(e).

Lettieri v. Blaisden

101 Pa. Super. 423 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1931

The plaintiff was riding as an invitee on the left running board of an automobile. The car was filled and plaintiff and three young men were standing on the running boards, two on each side of the car. … Havey, 291 Pa. 30 , it was held to be contributory negligence as a matter of law to stand on the running board of a moving automobile. Fol *425 lowing this case, it was held, in Zavodnick v.

Commonwealth v. Taggart

258 Pa. Super. 210 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1978

Browne, Jr., also a member of the Lancaster County Public Defender’s Office. After the filing of that appeal, appellant advised Mr. Browne that he intended to raise the issue of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. … Commonwealth v. Moore, 466 Pa. 510 , 353 A.2d 808 (1976); Commonwealth v. Strachan, 460 Pa. 407 , 333 A.2d 790 (1975); Commonwealth v. Jackson, 457 Pa. 237 , 324 A.2d 350 (1974); Commonwealth v.