Case law

Salamone v. Pennsylvania Fireworks Display Co.

111 Pa. Super. 220 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1933

.’ *223 And in Welsch v. … In the light of these cases, the exceptions are sustained, the award of the Board is reversed and judgment is entered in favor of the State Workmen’s Insurance Fund.” We do not interpret the decisions in Delaney v.

Solop v. Centralia Collieries Co.

174 Pa. Super. 606 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1953

, we must affirm the Board. … Gill v. Fives, 170 Pa. Superior Ct. 564 , 88 A. 2d 109 . The evidence in question is wholly medical and involves *608 only the question of the cause of death.

Wenders v. White Mills Independent School District

171 Pa. Super. 39 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

Superior Ct. 421 , 190 A. 210 ), which is not subject to rescission or revocation by action of the board duly taken and recorded.” In the case immediately following, Ickes v. Costlow, 127 Pa. … Walters v. Topper, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 292 , 11 A. 2d 649 . Without a written contract, appellee’s appointment was subject'to rescission or revocation by the board, Potts v. Penn Twp.

Sierzega v. United States Steel Corp.

204 Pa. Super. 531 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

DeMascola v. Lancaster, 200 Pa. … Mohr v. Desimone & Sayers, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 , 167 A. 504 (1933) ; McCleary v. Pa. Electric Co., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 185 , 132 A. 2d 389 (1957); Leftwrich v. Colonial Alum. Sm.

Beechwood Improvement Co. v. Farrell City

123 Pa. Super. 544 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1936

The resolutions of the board of managers clearly express an intention of an immediate transfer of all of the assets of the company, including its claims, demands, rights, and privileges, to the appellant. See Ruple v. … See Smith v. Bank of Washington, 5 Serg. & R. 318; Henderson et al. v. Hughes, 320 Pa. 124 , 182 A. 392 .

Commonwealth v. Davis

708 A.2d 116 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 2, 1998

Appellant relies upon Abney et al. v. … Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 549 , 63 S.Ct. 379 [386-387], 87 L.Ed. 443 (1943) *120 (quoting Moore v. Illinois, 55 U.S. 13, 14, How. 13, 19, 14 L.Ed. 306 (1852)).

Puza v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

98 Pa. Super. 139 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1929

Superior Ct. 1 , and Labuck v. … It was for the referee and the board to weigh and consider the testimony relative to the alleged violation of the rules: Labuck v. Mill Creek Coal Co., supra; Krischunas v.

Utzman v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.

96 Pa. Super. 463 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1929

At the outset we may say that the board, since the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 664, sec. 42'3, has the power to set aside findings of fact of a referee: Vonot v. Hudson Coal Co., 285 Pa. 385 ; Vorbnoff v. … its finding of fact, and the award based thereon: Smith v.

Kelce v. Swift & Co.

115 Pa. Super. 570 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1934

This award was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and subsequently judgment entered thereon by the lower court. … Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199 , 133 A. 256 ; Hiles v. Hecla Coal and Coke Co., 296 Pa. 34 , 145 A. 603 ; Loeffler v. Western Electric Co., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 163 A. 322 .

Wynne v. Lower Merion Township

181 Pa. Super. 524 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

Boron v. Smith, 380 Pa. 98 , 110 A. 2d 169 . … American and English Encyclopedia of Law, Vol. 17, page 235, cited in Schaul, Appellant, v. Lancaster City, 156 Pa. 362 -365 (1893).

Carl v. American Window Glass Co.

152 Pa. Super. 475 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1943

is in line with our recent decisions in Hammill v. … Superior Ct. 121 , 27 A. 2d 289 ; Bowers v. Schell, 152, Pa. Superior Ct. 112, 31 A. 2d 442 ; and Senchak v. Tech Food Products Co., 152 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Walters

2002 Pa. Super. 408 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 2002

"Parole is a matter of grace and mercy shown to a prisoner who has demonstrated to the Board's satisfaction his ability to function as a law abiding member of society." Commonwealth v. … See Rogers v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 555 Pa. 285 , 724 A.2d 319 , 321 n. 2 (1999) (citations omitted). A prisoner otherwise has no entitlement to parole. See id.

Beener v. North American Machine Co.

204 Pa. Super. 506 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

Hanyok v. Pa. Coal & Coke Corp., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. *510 194, 199 , 38 A. 2d 537 (1944). In Ream v. Saxman Coal & C. Co., 191 Pa. … The credibility of medical witnesses and the weight to be attached to their testimony are matters exclusively for the board. The board is not even required to accept as true uncontradicted testimony. Moore v.

Gill Unemployment Compensation Case

165 Pa. Super. 605 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1950

. . was mailed to his last known post office address, and applies for a hearing, such determination of the department, with respect to the particular facts set forth in such notice, shall be final . . .” *608 In Layton v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 156 Pa.

McGahen v. General Electric Co.

195 Pa. Super. 651 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

The board treated her petition as one to enforce payment under the open original agreement to which the one year Statute of Limitation, §413, does not apply, Holtz v. McGraw and Bindley, 161 Pa. … Klingerman v.

Meyers, M. v. Certifiied Guaranty Company, LLC

221 A.3d 662 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2019

Id. at § 566, Comment (a); see also Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 21 (1990) (quoting Scott v. … Milkovich v.

Treski v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

126 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 2, 1937

Superior Ct. 462 , 186 A. 415 , citing Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56, 62 , 115 A. 889 ; Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 262 Pa. 1 , 104 A. 801 . … As stated in Stahl v.

Camizzi v. E. T. Fraim Lock Co.

151 Pa. Super. 3 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1942

If appellee has, in fact, permanently lost the use of her hand, the extent of her disability is entirely immaterial, for, as definitely stated by our Supreme Court in Lente v. … In our opinion, these considerations render this award comparable to the award which we considered in the case of Kilgore v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund et al., 127 Pa.

Irvin v. Plymouth Meeting Rubber Division Linear, Inc.

182 Pa. Super. 280 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1956

Medical testimony may properly be the basis of the Board’s decision, notwithstanding the claimant’s testimony to the contrary: Mahoney v. Mulholland Roofing Co., 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 498 , 5 A. 2d 812 . … v.

Commonwealth ex rel. McCuff v. McCuff

196 Pa. Super. 320 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1961

Brobst v. Brobst, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 171 , 96 A. 2d 194 ; Commonwealth v. Levitz, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 438 , 150 A. 2d 581 . … Lipschultz v. Lipschultz, 179 Pa. Superior Ct. 527 , 117 A. 2d 793 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown, 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 324 , 171 A. 2d 833 .