Case law

Sierzega v. United States Steel Corp.

204 Pa. Super. 531 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1964

DeMascola v. Lancaster, 200 Pa. … Mohr v. Desimone & Sayers, 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 , 167 A. 504 (1933) ; McCleary v. Pa. Electric Co., 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 185 , 132 A. 2d 389 (1957); Leftwrich v. Colonial Alum. Sm.

Beechwood Improvement Co. v. Farrell City

123 Pa. Super. 544 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1936

The resolutions of the board of managers clearly express an intention of an immediate transfer of all of the assets of the company, including its claims, demands, rights, and privileges, to the appellant. See Ruple v. … See Smith v. Bank of Washington, 5 Serg. & R. 318; Henderson et al. v. Hughes, 320 Pa. 124 , 182 A. 392 .

Kennedy v. Holmes Const. Co. (Et Al.)

147 Pa. Super. 348 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 20, 1941

Coder v. Pittsburgh Des Moines Steel Co., supra, pp. 411, 412; Swalm v. J. H. Brokhoff, Inc., 145 Pa. Superior Ct. 218, 223 , 20 A. 2d 797 ; Yerko v. … The credibility of the witnesses was solely for the referee and the board. Edmiston v. Wolf, Sheriff et al., 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 7, 12 , 3 A. 2d 177 .

Behanna v. Meyers

163 Pa. Super. 200 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1948

Kline v. Kiehl, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 392, 395 , 43 A. 2d 616 ; Howard v. McClane, 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, 216 , 22 A. 2d 225 ; Meyers v. Lehigh Valley Transportation Co., 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 569, 573 , 10 A. 2d 879 . … Demmel v. Dilworth Co. et al., 136 Pa. Superior Ct. 37, 39 , 7 A. 2d 50 .” This Court in Horton v. West Penn Power Company, 119 Pa.

Kelce v. Swift & Co.

115 Pa. Super. 570 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1934

This award was affirmed by the Workmen’s Compensation Board, and subsequently judgment entered thereon by the lower court. … Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199 , 133 A. 256 ; Hiles v. Hecla Coal and Coke Co., 296 Pa. 34 , 145 A. 603 ; Loeffler v. Western Electric Co., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 163 A. 322 .

Wynne v. Lower Merion Township

181 Pa. Super. 524 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

Boron v. Smith, 380 Pa. 98 , 110 A. 2d 169 . … American and English Encyclopedia of Law, Vol. 17, page 235, cited in Schaul, Appellant, v. Lancaster City, 156 Pa. 362 -365 (1893).

Carl v. American Window Glass Co.

152 Pa. Super. 475 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1943

is in line with our recent decisions in Hammill v. … Superior Ct. 121 , 27 A. 2d 289 ; Bowers v. Schell, 152, Pa. Superior Ct. 112, 31 A. 2d 442 ; and Senchak v. Tech Food Products Co., 152 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Casuccio

308 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 1982

Brown. Three tool boxes bearing the appellant’s initials were found in one of the garages as well. … United States v.

McGahen v. General Electric Co.

195 Pa. Super. 651 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

The board treated her petition as one to enforce payment under the open original agreement to which the one year Statute of Limitation, §413, does not apply, Holtz v. McGraw and Bindley, 161 Pa. … Klingerman v.

Meyers, M. v. Certifiied Guaranty Company, LLC

221 A.3d 662 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 18, 2019

Id. at § 566, Comment (a); see also Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 497 U.S. 1, 21 (1990) (quoting Scott v. … Milkovich v.

Camizzi v. E. T. Fraim Lock Co.

151 Pa. Super. 3 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1942

If appellee has, in fact, permanently lost the use of her hand, the extent of her disability is entirely immaterial, for, as definitely stated by our Supreme Court in Lente v. … In our opinion, these considerations render this award comparable to the award which we considered in the case of Kilgore v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund et al., 127 Pa.

Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.

147 Pa. Super. 359 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1941

or by the order of such Board.” … This case is more nearly like Gardner v.

Maholland v. BIRD

230 Pa. Super. 431 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1974

Cooper v. Met. Life Ins. Co., 323 Pa. 295 , 186 A. 125 (1936). *435 It was for the jury to apply its experience to the instant facts to reach a conclusion on the issue. Appellant cites Cummings v. … of that diving board arrangement on that pool ....

Irvin v. Plymouth Meeting Rubber Division Linear, Inc.

182 Pa. Super. 280 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1956

Medical testimony may properly be the basis of the Board’s decision, notwithstanding the claimant’s testimony to the contrary: Mahoney v. Mulholland Roofing Co., 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 498 , 5 A. 2d 812 . … v.

Zbirowski v. John T. Lewis & Bros.

130 Pa. Super. 222 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1937

As to hearsay evidence admitted without objection, see Poluski v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 286 Pa. 473 , 133 A. 819 ; Johnston v. Payne-Yost Construction Co. et al., 292 Pa. 509 , 141 A. 481 ; Harrah v. … See Johnson v. Philadelphia & Reading R. R., 163 Pa. 127 , 29 A. 854 ; Ringle v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 164 Pa. 529 , 30 A. 492 ; Riddell v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 262 Pa. 582 , 106 A. 80 .

Rossman v. American Express Co.

70 Pa. Super. 525 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1918

Snow, 207 Pa. 447 ; Kiley v. Dilworth, 55 Pa. Superior Ct. 329 . Plaintiff was a helper, working with John de Rienzi, one of defendant’s drivers, up to February 18, 1918. … Simpson said “Lock him up”; Brown arrested him and he remained in jail for some time. Simpson testified against plaintiff at the hearing but he was discharged.

Commonwealth ex rel. McCuff v. McCuff

196 Pa. Super. 320 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1961

Brobst v. Brobst, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 171 , 96 A. 2d 194 ; Commonwealth v. Levitz, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 438 , 150 A. 2d 581 . … Lipschultz v. Lipschultz, 179 Pa. Superior Ct. 527 , 117 A. 2d 793 ; Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown, 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 324 , 171 A. 2d 833 .

Rue v. K-Mart Corp.

456 Pa. Super. 641 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1997

So long as Board rulings are not preclusive, employers have little incentive to contest or appeal board findings. See Sewall v. … Vann v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 508 Pa. 139 , 494 A.2d 1081 (1985).

George v. Ellis

2006 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 31, 2006

Commonwealth v. … , be board certified by the same or a similar approved board, except as provided in subsection (e).

Utzman v. Pennsylvania Rubber Co.

96 Pa. Super. 463 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1929

At the outset we may say that the board, since the Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 664, sec. 42'3, has the power to set aside findings of fact of a referee: Vonot v. Hudson Coal Co., 285 Pa. 385 ; Vorbnoff v. … its finding of fact, and the award based thereon: Smith v.