Case law

Philadelphia v. Dougherty

153 Pa. Super. 554 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 8, 1943

See also, Board of Home Missions [Methodist Episcopal Church] v. … board is binding and conclusive.

Kashner v. Geisinger Clinic

432 Pa. Super. 361 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 1, 1994

See Brown v. … See Eagle v.

Campbell v. Bessemer Coke Co.

23 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1903

It was said in Pfeiffer v. Brown, 165 Pa. 267 , that “ the defendant’s right to injure another’s land at all, to any extent, is an exception, and the burden is always upon him to bring himself within it.” … The same principle is supported in Brown et al. v. Torrence, 88 Pa. 186 , and Herbert v. Rainey, 162 Pa. 525 . The cases of Pennsylvania Coal Company v. Sanderson, 113 Pa. 126 , and Harvey v.

Bush v. Keystone Carbon Co.

211 Pa. Super. 422 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 22, 1967

Prior to this amendment this Court in Nolan v. Hake, 178 Pa. … In Vossbruch v. Reiner Electronics Co., Inc., 19 Pa.

Luckenbill v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

93 Pa. Super. 438 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 1928

The burden was upon the claimant to offer proof sufficient to sustain the board’s finding (Mauchline v. … Moreover, the rule is drawn even more strictly in Vorbnoff v.

Kosek v. Wilkes-Barre Township School District

110 Pa. Super. 295 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1933

of school directors or of the local board of health require. … He is not within the same class as the secretary of the board—Howell v.

Diamond v. Drucker

177 Pa. Super. 226 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

Paull v. Pivar, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 233, 237 , 53 A. 2d 826; Sterle v. Galiardi Coal & Coke Co., 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 254, 258 , 77 A. 2d 669 . … Armour, 218 Pa. 73 , 66 A. 1001; Spiess v. Simon, 65 Pa. Superior Ct. 311 ; Brown v. Brown, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 350, 352 , 64 A. 2d 506 ), have no application.

Hilt v. Roslyn Volunteer Fire Co.

215 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969

Accordingly, I believe that the Board’s finding, which preceded publication of Hamilton v. Procon, did not correctly weigh the appropriate factors as outlined in that opinion. … Before we pass on that question, however, the Board should have considered whether appellant had heart trouble prior to the heart attack now in question. I would reverse the Board for the reason stated in Foster v.

Commonwealth v. Stroud

699 A.2d 1305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 26, 1997

He returned the plastic bag to the brown paper bag, placed the brown bag back into the trunk, closed the lid, remained standing in the street, and resumed his conversation with the males with whom he had previously been talking … In Commonwealth v.

Boyle, E. v. Main Line Health

2025 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 2025

Berkeyheiser v. A-Plus Investigations, Inc., 936 A.2d 1117, 1123-24 (Pa.Super. 2007). See also Farrell v. … Chrysczanavicz v.

Litman v. Litman

185 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

The board is tbe ultimate arbiter of tbe facts and its findings are binding on appeal if supported by competent and substantial evidence. Greap v. Oberdorff, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 153, 157 , 113 A. 2d 339 ; Messikomer v. … Defendant cites Lacey v.

Eckman v. U. S. Lock & Hardware Co.

146 Pa. Super. 513 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1941

We think the board made a proper appraisal of this conversation. It was certainly not a spontaneous utterance immediately succeeding the act in question. Riley v. Carnegie Steel Co., supra, p. 84. … The board could not fail to recognize that the time of the occurrence was most indefinite, and could not be fixed with any degree of certainty. Kirby v. Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp., 145 Pa.

Patulonis v. Locust Mountain Coal Co.

160 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1946

Williams v. Baptist Church et al., 123 Pa. Superior Ct. 136 , 186 A. 168 ; Corniak v. Cohen et al., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 140 , 27 A. 2d 560 . … The referee, affirmed by the board, made, inter alia, the following findings of fact: “4.

Commonwealth v. Brann

81 Pa. Super. 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1923

V, article I, section 2, paragraph 9, P. … Norristown, *42 100 Pa. 368 ; Millerstown v. Bell, 123 Pa. 151, 154 ; Com. v. Jackson, 34 Pa. Superior Ct. 178 ; Com. v. Corson, 36 Pa. Superior Ct. 7 ; P. R. R. Co.’s Case, 213 Pa. 373 . Judgment affirmed.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Colcough v. Aytch

227 Pa. Super. 527 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1974

An unsupported allegation of an illegal arrest elsewhere was dismissed without elaboration in Brown v. Fogel, 387 F. 2d 692 (4th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1045 (1968). … See Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443 [1953].” As stated above, the issue in Hatton was whether the petitioner’s life would be in danger if he were returned to Mississippi to face charges of escape from prison.

Robbins v. Wilkes-Barre

37 Pa. Super. 382 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1908

Moir, 199 Pa. 534 ; Neuls v. Scranton City, 20 Pa. Superior Ct. 286 . … Fayette County, 150 Pa. 190 ; Commonwealth v. Weir, 165 Pa. 284 ; Lloyd v. Smith et al., 176 Pa. 213 . The Acts of May 23, 1874, P. L. 230, and May 23, 1889, P.

Commonwealth v. Costa-Hernandez

2002 Pa. Super. 211 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 26, 2002

For example, in Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 268 Pa.Super. 206 , 407 A.2d 1318 (1979).

Commonwealth ex rel. Shapiro v. Shapiro

204 Pa. Super. 135 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 1964

Coleman v. Coleman, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 256 , 133 A. 2d 307 . In the absence of any legal ground justifying her separation, a wife is not entitled to a support order: Commonwealth ex rel. Brown v. Brown, 195 Pa. … Justice Eagen in Commonwealth v.

Mitchell v. Kearns

16 Pa. Super. 357 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 14, 1900

Workhouse v. Moore, 95 Pa. 408 , Somerset Township v. Parsons, 105 Pa. 360 , School Dist. of Erie v. Fuess, 98 Pa. 600 , Nason v. Poor Directors, 126 Pa. 445 , Butler v. … Co. v. Montgomery Co. Pass. Ry. Co., 167 Pa. 62 , American Road Machine Co. v. Washington Township, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 105 , and Climax Road Machine Co. v. Allegheny Township, 10 Pa. Superior Ct. 437 .

Commonwealth v. Shannon

184 A.3d 1010 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2018

Michael Eakin in proceedings before the Judicial Conduct Board [ (JCB) ] at a time when [Appellant's] post-conviction proceedings were pending." PCRA Petition, 2/8/2016, at ¶ 1. … Brown , 141 A.3d 491 (Pa. Super. 2016) (regarding newly-discovered wiretaps regarding the murder of the police officer for which Brown was convicted); Commonwealth v.