Case law

D. B. S. Building Ass'n. v. Erie

177 Pa. Super. 487 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

In all probability, however, the “zoning board of appeals” is a board of adjustment as provided for in the Act of June 23, 1931, P. L. 932, art. XLI, section 4120, as amended, 53 PS sec. 12198-4120. … The appellants contend that the instant case is ruled by Perelman et al. v. Yeadon Borough Board of Adjustment, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 5 , 18 A. 2d 438 . We cannot agree.

Commonwealth v. Herman

288 Pa. Super. 219 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1981

The agencies listed were the State Board of Medical Education and Licensure, the State Board of Osteopathic Examiners, the State Board of Nurse Examiners, the State Board of Pharmacy, the State Board of Podiatry Examiners … , the State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners, the State Dental Council and Examining Board, and the State Board of Optometrical Examiners.

Davis v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.

157 Pa. Super. 133 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 26, 1944

v. … Pearson, 284 Pa. 348 ; Crispin v. Leedom & Worrel Co., 341 Pa. 325 ; Pastva v. Forge Coal Mining Co., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 42 ; Paydo v. Union Collieries Co., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 385 .”

McCay v. Luzerne & Carbon County Motor Transit Co.

125 Pa. Super. 217 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 9, 1936

Courts will not aid a corporation to procure benefits by conduct that is repugnant to every sense of justice and fair dealing: Presbyterian Board v. Gilbee, 212 Pa. 310 , 61 A. 925 . In Gordon v. … V. Co. v. S. G. V. Co., supra ( 264 Pa. 265, 269 , 107 A. 721 ). In Stony Brook Lumber Co. v.

Kingston Boro. v. Kalanosky

155 Pa. Super. 424 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1944

Philadelphia v. Miller, 42 Pa. Superior Ct. 471 . … Pew v. Minor, 216 Pa. 343 , 65 A. 787 . See also Naffah v. City Deposit Bank, 339 Pa. 157 , 13 A. (2d) 63.

Keely v. Metropolitan Edison Co.

157 Pa. Super. 63 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1944

Accordingly the board concluded that the present claim was within the exception applicable to an employee assigned to the performance of a special duty and therefore compensable. Haddock v. … The board accepted claimant’s medical testimony in material respects. We are of the opinion, as was the lower court, that the facts and reasonable inferences from them (Had dock v.

McIntosh v. Sylvania Co.

195 Pa. Super. 198 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

It is the prerogative of the referee and the board, and not the courts, to weigh the testimony of witnesses and to accept or reject it in whole or in part. Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co., 192 Pa. … There is also evidence to support a finding of partial disability, and the finding of the board that the disability was partial and not total is conclusive, and cannot be disturbed on appeal. Zbieg v.

Gaich v. Kerlin Construction Co., Inc.

170 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1952

It was proper for the board to consider these expenses. In Franey v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 105 Pa. … Morris v.

Commonwealth v. Sanders

260 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1978

The victim then led Officer Ligato and Detective Hall to a house on Brown Street where “Donnie” Snelling lived. … As Judge Spaeth observed in Commonwealth v.

Gerardi v. Harleysville Insurance

293 Pa. Super. 375 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 18, 1981

Brown, 63 Cal.2d 508 , 47 Cal.Rptr. 363 , 407 P.2d 275 (1965); cf. Touchette v. Northwestern Mutual Insurance Company, 80 Wash.2d 327 , 494 P.2d 479 (1972) (citing Mission Insurance Company v. Brown). … See also Shamey v.

Commonwealth v. One 1939 Cadillac Sedan

158 Pa. Super. 392 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1945

at the board’s discretion. … In Commonwealth v.

Sweeney Unemployment Compensation Case

177 Pa. Super. 243 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1955

Barclay White Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 . … Barclay White Company v. *248 Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, supra, 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 .

Jessie v. Dash

194 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960

Nazarey v. Lehigh Val. Coal Co., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 93 , 198 A. 899 (1938); Heyler v. Sullivan & Sons Mfg. Corp., 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 615 , 94 A. 2d 95 (1953); Leber v. Naftulin, 179 Pa. … Mahoney v. F. M. Roofing Co., 135 Pa. Superior Ct. 498 , 5 A. 2d 812 (1939); Gower v. Mackes, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 41, 46 , 132 A. 2d 880 (1957). In the case of Broad St. Tr. Co. v. Heyl Bros., 128 Pa.

Shay v. North Side Bank & Trust Co.

132 Pa. Super. 53 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1938

The judgment was entered in substantial accordance with the principles announced by this court in Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 579 , 186 A. 400 , and Kessler v. … Under all the authorities, including Melody v. Bornot, Inc. et al., 112 Pa.

Commonwealth v. McClintock

433 Pa. Super. 83 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 7, 1994

See Commonwealth v. Williams, 532 Pa. 265 , 615 A.2d 716 (1992); Commonwealth v. McCullum, 529 Pa. 117 , 602 A.2d 313 (1992). … He stated he got a good look at the driver and described him as a white male, in his 40’s, with brown hair, gray at the temples and brown eyes.

Commonwealth v. Tyahla

128 Pa. Super. 414 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1937

It is true that a witness to good reputation may testify by saying that he has never heard anything said against the person: Wigmore, Evidence, 2nd Edition, §1614; Milliken v. Long, 188 Pa. 411 , 41 A. 540 . … the jurors clearly understand the issties which they are to decide and are enabled by these instructions, if honestly and sensibly considered by them, to reach a just conclusion, counsel have no cause for complaint”: Com. v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Carmelo v. Burke

168 Pa. Super. 109 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1951

Meinzer v. Smith, 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 250 , 180 A. 179 ; Com. ex rel. Kent v. Smith, 323 Pa. 89 , 186 A. 812 ; Narcise v. Board of Trustees, Eastern State Penitentiary, 137 Pa. … “The grace extended by parole is the grace of the law and not of the Board;...": Com. ex rel. Tate v. Burke, supra, 364 Pa. 179, 185 , 71 A. 2d 241, 244 . In Narcise v.

In re Appeal of Affected & Aggrieved Residents from the Adverse Action of the Supervisors

325 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 3, 1984

See Leonard v. Zoning Hearing Board of Cheltenham Township, 72 Pa.Cmwlth. 237 , 457 A.2d 132 (1983). … Grove v. Zoning Hearing Board of Thornbury Township, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 47, 50 , 397 A.2d 22, 24 (1979). Accord School District of Pittsburgh v. Rankin, 55 Pa.Cmwlth. 371, 373 , 423 A.2d 1087, 1088 (1980); Marlowe v.

Commonwealth ex rel. White v. Day

178 Pa. Super. 491 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Williamson v. Burke, 172 Pa. Superior Ct. 39 , 92 A. 2d 239 ; Com. ex rel. Clawges v. Claudy, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 410 , 98 A. 2d 225 . … Lyons v. Day, 177 Pa.

Solomon v. Luria

213 Pa. Super. 87 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1968

Superior Ct. 87 (1968) Solomon v. Luria, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 13, 1968. September 12, 1968. Before WRIGHT, P.J., WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, SPAULDING, and HANNUM, JJ. … OPINION PER CURIAM, September 12, 1968: The judgment of the court below is affirmed on the opinion of Honorable FRANCIS SHUNK BROWN, JR., P.J.