Case law

Commonwealth v. Bey

841 A.2d 562 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 2004

Thus, this Court in Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Hilt v. Roslyn Volunteer Fire Co.

215 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 11, 1969

Accordingly, I believe that the Board’s finding, which preceded publication of Hamilton v. Procon, did not correctly weigh the appropriate factors as outlined in that opinion. … Before we pass on that question, however, the Board should have considered whether appellant had heart trouble prior to the heart attack now in question. I would reverse the Board for the reason stated in Foster v.

Guzik v. Laurel Ridge Construction Co.

196 Pa. Super. 586 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1961

See Patulonis v. Locust Mt. Coal Co., 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 401 , 51 A. 2d 352 . … See Spry v. Polt, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 326 , 142 A. 2d 484 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Hendrick

196 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1961

It should be noted that appellant’s proper remedy in this matter is not by a writ of habeas corpus but rather through a writ of mandamus brought against the Board of Parole in Dauphin County. Com. ex rel. Trevethan v. … Thus, the Board of Parole did not err in its direction. See Com. ex rel. Salerno v. Banmiller, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 149 A. 2d 501 ; Com. ex rel. Miller v. Myers, 189 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Sanchez

204 A.3d 524 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 19, 2019

Commonwealth v. Brown, 111 A.3d 171, 176 (Pa. Super. 2015). … In Commonwealth v. Foreman, 55 A.3d 532 (Pa.

Commonwealth ex rel. Wright v. Banmiller

195 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1961

Howard v. Claudy, 172 Pa. … Likewise, the action of the Board of Parole in recommitting a person for violation of parole cannot be reviewed by habeas corpus. Commonwealth ex rel. Biglow v.

Bostic v. DREHER

206 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

See Knight v. Millard, 350 Pa. 17 , 38 A. 2d 264 ; Lackman v. F. W. Woolworth Co., 205 Pa. Superior Ct. 129 , 208 A. 2d 33 . … The credibility and weight of the testimony was for the Board, and the record discloses no capricious disregard of competent evidence. Cf. Verna v. Stabler, 204 Pa.

Grant v. Wark Construction Co.

152 Pa. Super. 214 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 1943

The board is the ultimate fact-finding body and the final judge of the credibility of witnesses: Johnson v. Valvoline Oil Co., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 266 , 200 A. 224 ; Russell v. Scott Paper Co., 140 Pa. … It should be added that claimant explained his discrepancies to the satisfaction of the board.

Sharp v. McKelvey

196 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1961

In other words, I will not be responsible for board after the end of April. … Ivey Co. v. Franklin Associates, 370 Pa. 225 , 87 A. 2d 236 ; Powell Appeal, 385 Pa. 467 , 123 A. 2d 650 ; Cerceo v. DeMarco, 391 Pa. 157 , 137 A. 2d 296 ; Byrne v. Bushkoff, 177 Pa. Superior Ct. 101 , 110 A. 2d 813 .

Palady v. Reliance Steel Products Co.

165 Pa. Super. 370 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1949

The board may accept or reject, in whole or in part, the testimony of any witness; and the credibility and the weight of testimony of one who qualifies as an expert are not reviewable as a matter of law”: Kline v. … We are unable to find that there was any capricious disregard of competent evidence by the board. See Kostello v. Kostello, 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 194, 196 , 48 A. 2d 25 ; Sullivan v. National Tube Co., 163 Pa.

Adams v. Brandon

111 Pa. Super. 471 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1933

Co. v. Hoover, Hughes & Co., 113 Pa. 591 , 8 A. 163 ; Elkins & Co. v. Ins. Co., *475 113 Pa. 386 , 6 A. 224 ; Long v. Ins. Co., 137 Pa. 335 , 20 A. 1014 . Under the terms of Section 651 of the Act of May 17, 1921, P. … In the case of Levan v.

Wheeler v. National Nayle Grip Co.

149 Pa. Super. 596 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1942

It is not our function to weigh the conflicting opinions of these experts; that was exclusively for the board. Puzio v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 488 , 191 A. 222 . … McGrath v. Herzog et al., 126 Pa. Superior Ct. 229, 233 , 190 A. 550 .

Phillips Unemployment Compensation Case

163 Pa. Super. 374 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1948

Bodinson Manufacturing Company v. California Employment Commission, 17 Cal. (2d) 321, 109 P. 2d 935 . *378 Appellant was not what President Judge Keller in Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. … Unemployment Compensation Law, .§ 5Í0, 43 PS § 830; Hall v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 65 , 49 A. 2d 872 ; D’Yantone Unemployment Compensation Case, 159 Pa.

Abbadini v. Vesta Coal Co.

149 Pa. Super. 244 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1942

When the board acts and its findings are based on substantial competent evidence the lower court and this court, even if so inclined, are concluded from holding otherwise: Hoosca v. Lytle Coal Company, 129 Pa. … Superior Ct. 434, 436 , 196 A. 892 ; Cox v. Woodlands Cemetery Company, 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 313, 316 , 2 A. 2d 565 ; Flood v. Logan Iron & Steel *248 Company et al., 136 Pa.

Kenner v. Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity, Inc.

2002 Pa. Super. 269 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2002

(Kappa), James Brown, Eric S. Morris, Kevin Clark, Jwyanza V. Nurid-den, and Rhen Bass. … Althaus v.

A. G. Breitweiser Lumber Co. v. Crick

55 Pa. Super. 72 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1913

Brown v. Gourley, 214 Pa. 154 , is also cited by appellant and it is contended that it is in point in the present case. But in that case the items of set-off were clearly specified in the affidavit. … Co. v.

Commonwealth v. Kauffman

249 Pa. Super. 600 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1977

Superior Ct. 600 (1977) 377 A.2d 986 Commonwealth v. Kauffman, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 20, 1977. August 24, 1977. *601 Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. D.

Reininger Appeal

160 Pa. Super. 443 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1946

under the act, for the board to hear and dispose of the appeal. … Suermann et al. v. Hadley, Treas., 327 Pa. 190, 205 , 193 A. 645 .

Johnson Unemployment Compensation Case

182 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1956

Opinion by Carr, J., This appeal from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board denying a claim for unemployment benefits presents the question whether the record supports the findings and conclusions of the board that … Superior Ct. 569 , 56 A. 2d 380 ; Ambridge Savings & Loan Association v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 515 , 124 A. 2d 513 .

Leedom v. Spano

436 Pa. Super. 18 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 22, 1994

The township zoning board subsequently denied the request for a change in zoning. This decision was appealed and ultimately reversed by our Supreme Court. See Surrick v. … See Brown v. Henry, 106 Pa. 262 (1884) (our Supreme Court rejected a claim that a subsequent purchaser could recover based on a forged satisfaction of a mortgage); Lancaster v.