Case law

Woods v. Ellerbe

389 Pa. Super. 281 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 20, 1989

Quoting Hall v. … See Brown, supra (focus is not to be on the reasonableness of defendant insurer’s settlement behavior).

Manufacturers' Finance Acceptance Corp. v. Jordan Distributors, Inc.

111 Pa. Super. 448 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 11, 1933

In Brumbaugh v. … The case of Boot v.

Paul Gima v. the Hudson Coal Co.

106 Pa. Super. 288 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 1932

of the referee, approved by the board. … The case of O’Neil v. American Fire Ins. Co., 166 Pa. 72 , on which the Board and lower court relied in that case has been distinguished by the Supreme Court in Com. v. Alderman, 275 Pa. 483, 490 , and Com. v.

School Dist. of Sharon v. J. Boyle Est.

114 Pa. Super. 416 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1934

Howard, 149 Pa. 302 , 24 A. 308 ; Lawhead v. Craig, 315 Pa. 49 , 172 A. 104 . Whatever is not included in the statement of facts as presented is presumed to have been kept out for sufficient reasons: Mutchler v. … City of Easton, 148 Pa. 441 , 23 A. 1109 ; and not to exist: Richardson v. First Brethren Church, 314 Pa. 423 , 171 A. 897 .

Rzasa's Liquor License Case

179 Pa. Super. 30 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

V, 47 PS §4—464, provides in part: “In considering the renewal of a license, the board shall not refuse any such renewal on the basis of the propriety of the original issuance or any prior renewal of such license.” … of the board effective June 25, 1952.

O'Neill v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.

108 Pa. Super. 425 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1932

Moreover,'neither the referee nor the board made any finding to the effect that there had been any unusual exertion upon the part of the employe. Clearly, this case is ruled by the principles announced in Gausman v. … Pearson Co., 284 Pa. 348 ; Diriscavage v. Penna. Coal Co., 96 Pa. Superior Ct. 189 ; Lacey v. Washburn and Williams Company, supra, and Waleski v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 43 .

Rowles v. State Workmen's Insurance Fund

141 Pa. Super. 193 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1940

Ross v. Mayflower Drug Stores, 338 Pa. 211 , 12 A. 2d 569 . … Dist. v. Wahlers, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 35 ), which in this connection includes an unintentional deception: Horn v. Lehigh Val. R. R. Co., 274 Pa. 42, 44 , 117 A. 409 .

Burleson Unemployment Compensation Case

173 Pa. Super. 527 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

American Chain and Cable Co. v. United Steelwoorkers, 43 Luz. Leg. Reg. … See Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers, Local Union No. 776, 373 Pa. 19 , 94 A. 2d 893 .

Shuda v. Shuda

283 Pa. Super. 253 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 19, 1980

Brown v. Brown, 254 Pa.Super. 410 , 386 A.2d 15 (1978). Some cases suggest that this means the parties are still married. E. g., Ponthus v. Ponthus, 70 Pa.Super. 39 (1918). … Brown v.

Zbieg v. Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co.

175 Pa. Super. 308 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1954

Baughman v. Hockensmith, etc., Co., 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 314 , 44 A. 2d 764 ; Rozauski v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 460 , 69 A. 2d 192 . … The Board was not obliged to accept the recommendation of this impartial medical witness nor his medical testimony upon which it was based. Bartman v. Jones & Laughlin, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 31 , 60 A. 2d 565 .

Commonwealth v. Kauffman

249 Pa. Super. 600 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 24, 1977

Superior Ct. 600 (1977) 377 A.2d 986 Commonwealth v. Kauffman, Appellant. Superior Court of Pennsylvania. Argued June 20, 1977. August 24, 1977. *601 Edward F. Browne, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. D.

Everitt v. Baker Refrigerator Co.

197 Pa. Super. 611 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962

The Board is the final arbiter of the facts, Erwin v. L. & H. Construction Co., 192 Pa. … Superior Ct. 632 , 161 A. 2d 639 , and the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the party having the Board’s decision: Dandy v. Glaze, 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 218 , 177 A. 2d 157 .

Huerbin v. D. L. Clark Co.

140 Pa. Super. 406 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 9, 1940

The real problem the board had to meet was to determine the degree of disability of the claimant. The proofs met the requirements as stated in Eberts v. … “It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”: Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 305 U. S. 197, 229 , 59 S. Ct. 206 .

Commonwealth v. Plowden

2017 Pa. Super. 61 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 8, 2017

In support, Plowden cites Commonwealth v. … Bradford, 46 A.3d 693 (Pa. 2012), the Pennsylvania Supreme Court explained its decision in Browne, stating: In Browne, the defendant was issued a Notice of Arraignment by the district justice at the conclusion

Elk Textile Co. v. Cohen

75 Pa. Super. 478 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1921

Burkholder, 69 Pa. 249 ; Fowler v. Meadow Brook Water Co., 208 Pa. 473 ; Elzea v. Brown, 59 Pa. Superior Ct. 403 . Reliance is placed on the 69th section of the Sales Act of 1915, P. … What is a reasonable time within which to exercise the. right to return is a question of law when there is no controversy as to the facts: Moneyweight Scale v. Woodward, 29 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 ; Zellar v. Haupt, 41 Pa.

Schrecengost v. O. K. Heilman Trucking Co.

174 Pa. Super. 299 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1953

There was sufficient evidence to sustain the Board’s finding that the payment was voluntarily made *304 in relief of claimant’s incapacity to labor and in the nature of informal compensation: Cotton v. John Wood Mfg. … Furthermore, credit must be given for the $40.00 payment: Creighton v. Continental Roll & Steel Foundry Co., supra; Hickey v. Cudahy Packing Co., supra; Long v. City of Philadelphia, 150 Pa.

Michalsky Unemployment Compensation Case

163 Pa. Super. 436 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1948

Barclay White Co. v. Unemp. Comp. Bd., *439 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 . In Dept. L. & I. etc. v. Unemplmnt. Comp. Bd., 148 Pa. … One who voluntarily leaves his work (Mandel v. Unemply. Comp. Board, 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 580 , 15 A. 2d 479 ) or unreasonably refuses proper employment (Brilhart Unemploy. Compensation Case, 159 Pa.

Commonwealth v. One Dodge Sedan

141 Pa. Super. 34 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1940

Supp. 145, and Young’s Market Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 12 Fed Supp. 140. In State Board v. Young’s Market Co., 299 U. S. 59 , the Supreme Court, speaking through Mr. … Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 59 ; Clason v. Indiana, 306 U. S. 439 . ...... The two cases last cited [State Board v. Young’s Market Co., 299 U. S. 59, 63 ; Clason v. Indiana, 306 U.

Capriotti v. Philadelphia Inquirer Co.

156 Pa. Super. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1944

This appeal, therefore, is unavailing: Baumeister v. Baugh and Sons Co. et al., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 346 , 16 A. 2d 424 ; Smith v. Wm. Hodges Co. et al., 151 Pa. Superior Ct. 14, 18 , 28 A. 2d 719 . … If the board had so found and made an award it would be upheld (Redrick v. Knapp Brothers Co. et al., 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 92 , 193 A. 117 ; Holobinko v. Moshannon Smithing Coal Co. et al., 145 Pa.

Commonwealth ex rel. Smith v. Hendrick

196 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1961

It should be noted that appellant’s proper remedy in this matter is not by a writ of habeas corpus but rather through a writ of mandamus brought against the Board of Parole in Dauphin County. Com. ex rel. Trevethan v. … Thus, the Board of Parole did not err in its direction. See Com. ex rel. Salerno v. Banmiller, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 149 A. 2d 501 ; Com. ex rel. Miller v. Myers, 189 Pa.