Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterspasuperct

10,000+ results

1.13s

  • Wiles v. American Oil Co.

    105 Pa. Super. 282 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1932

    Superior Ct. 235 ; Morucci v. Susquehanna Col. Co., 297 Pa. 508, 513 . We said in Short v. Hughes Coal Co., 96 Pa. … The underlying facts found by the referee and the board do not permit that conclusion to be sustained. Whether the evidence brings the claim within the statutory definition of “premises” is a question of law: Johnson v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Zborovian v. Suffolk Anthracite Collieries Co.

    93 Pa. Super. 320 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1928

    To some extent this was corroborated by the physician called by the Board. This evidence meets the requirements of the latest decisions. See Skroki v. Crucible Steel Company of America, Pa. … Death caused by over-exertion in the course of employment is an accident, compensable under the compensation statute's: Samoskie v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 280 Pa. 203 ; Calderwood v. Consolidated L. & S. Co., 91 Pa.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. State Workmen's Insurance

    100 Pa. Super. 12 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1930

    L. 642, 644: Massett v. Armerford Coal Co., 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 579, 583 . … In our opinion the board, in disposing of this appeal, did not properly exercise its revisory jurisdiction as conferred by the statute and as outlined in the ease of Vorbnoff v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Bayer Liquor License Case

    200 Pa. Super. 210 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

    The Board has appealed to this court. There is no dispute as to the facts. … A liquor license may be suspended or revoked for violations of the law by employes even though there is no evidence that the licensee knew of such violations: McGrath v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 185 Pa.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Lewis

    407 Pa. Super. 186 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1991

    The suspects were pointed out to Officer Ciupinski who observed them board the train. … The officer watched them board the train and decided to approach them on their return trip.

    Reversed on other grounds by Commonwealth v. Lewis, 535 Pa. 501 (1994)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Evans v. Philadelphia & Reading C. & I. Co.

    116 Pa. Super. 284 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1934

    Payments made thereunder were by virtue of the award and not under the agreement: Putt v. Laher Ice Cream Co., 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 536, 539 , 161 A. 622 . … There was ample evidence to support the finding made by the board. The precise question raised on this appeal was decided by this court in Roeschen v. Dietrich, 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 163 A. 63 , and Foster v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Berry v. Berry

    2006 Pa. Super. 98 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 2006

    Christianson v. … Miller v. Miller, 783 A.2d 832, 835 (Pa.Super.2001) (quoting Rohrer v.

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • J. C. Grille, Inc. Liquor License Case

    181 Pa. Super. 456 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

    In McCloskey v. … Superior Ct. 428 , 98 A. 2d 645 , *468 in no way questions the discretion exercised by the Board. The order of the lower court is affirmed. 1 Board of Education of Lawnside v.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Morris Unemployment Compensation Case

    169 Pa. Super. 564 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1951

    The Board’s ultimate finding is: “16. … Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 534 , 79 A. 2d 796 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Yohey v. Burton

    139 Pa. Super. 393 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1939

    You can see the board room, translux and the board. I was watching the market as it opened. I kept motioning to him to come on out. When Mr. Henshaw finally was through, he opened the door and came out. Q. … McCreery et al., 307 Pa. 62 , 160 A. 722 ; Rosenthal v. Brown et al., 247 N. Y. 479 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Jankaitis v. Harleigh Brookwood Coal Co.

    134 Pa. Super. 125 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1938

    In that conclusion the board was precisely correct. In two recent cases, Parks v. Miller Printing Machine Co., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 530 , 4 A. 2d 831 and Mazza v. Kensington Water Co., 133 Pa. … In Swiderski v. Rainey, 114 Pa.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Baron v. Wilkes-Barre Railway Co.

    71 Pa. Super. 103 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1919

    Railroad Co., 233 Pa. 344 ; Rist v. Rapid Transit Co., 236 Pa. 218 . … Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., supra; Mahoney v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 214 Pa. 180 ; Keator v. Traction Co., 191 Pa. 112 ; Sligo v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co., 224 Pa. 135 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rehder v. Miller

    35 Pa. Super. 344 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 28, 1908

    The floor was composed of boards extending the full depth of the porch. … A few days afterward the tenant stepped on the fractured board which broke under her weight, causing her to fall and break her leg. The landlord was held to be liable: Aldag v. Ott, 28 Ind. 542 . The case of Gill v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Uglaky v. Hudson Coal Co.

    152 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1943

    The credibility of these medical witnesses and the weight to be attached to the testimony of each were for the consideration of the board, not the court below: Swalm v. J. E. Brokhoff, Inc., 145 Pa. … The findings of fact by the board were conclusive and the court below was without authority to change them: Hamer v. West Virginia Pulp and Paper Co., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 144, 150 , 18 A. 2d 452 ; Thomas v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Mancuso v. Mancuso

    150 Pa. Super. 22 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1942

    Superior Ct. 581, 584, 585 , 176 A. 60 ; Corrento v. Ventresca et al., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 358, 363 , 19 A. 2d 746 . Although the board was not bound to accept the testimony of claimant and his physician (Bakaisa v. … Such testimony also supports the eleventh finding of fact of the board. See Ferraro v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 142 Pa. Superior Ct. 22, 28, 29 , 15 A. 2d 559 . The conclusion of Judge Cunningham in Eckenroad v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Valentino, M. v. Philadelphia Triathlon

    Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 30, 2015

    Similarly, in Brown v. Moore, 247 F.2d 711 (3rd Cir. 1957), cert. … Id.3 3 Brown was disapproved of by Grbac v. Reading Fair Co., 688 F.2d 215 (3rd Cir. 1982).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. MacHi

    294 Pa. Super. 338 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 14, 1982

    Accord, Commonwealth v. Kluska, 484 Pa. 508 , 399 A.2d 681 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 858 , 100 S.Ct. 120 , 62 L.Ed.2d 78 (1979); Commonwealth v. Brown, 264 Pa.Superior Ct. 127, 399 A.2d 699 (1979); Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 264 Pa.Superior Ct. 127, 399 A.2d 699 (1979) (250 days between suppression hearing and trial); Commonwealth v. Taylor, 254 Pa.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Caviston v. Lang

    152 Pa. Super. 51 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1943

    returning the record to the board to enter the only judgment possible under its ruling: Apker v. … We said in Hornbake v. Hornbake, 72 Pa.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Ruckinger

    239 Pa. Super. 520 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 29, 1976

    Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3148-3149 . … Brown v. Illinois, supra at 3151 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Phillips

    183 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

    As Hicks boarded the bus, with his back to the door, he was struck on the back of the neck and head, his arms were pinned to his side, and he was dragged backward to the sidewalk. … Com. v. Brown, 309 Pa. 515, 522 , 164 A. 726 .

    Cited 70 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.