Case law

McAndrew Unemployment Compensation Case

178 Pa. Super. 98 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1955

After re-argument at the request of counsel for the claimant the board reaffirmed its decision denying benefits to claimant. The relevant findings of the board are as follows: “3. … While it is true the board is not required to “conform to common law or statutory rules of evidence,” Law, supra, §505, 43 PS §825; see Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 168 Pa.

Artac v. Union Collieries Co.

140 Pa. Super. 499 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1940

The board did not consider this factor in determining the question of change in claimant’s earning power. It has been indicated (Bispels v. C. R. Shoemaker, Inc. et al., 133 Pa. … See Carson v. *505 Real Estate-Land T. & T. Co., 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 37 , 165 A. 677 ; Stanella v. Scranton Coal Co., supra, 513.

Ede v. Ruhe Motor Corp.

184 Pa. Super. 603 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1957

applied to the facts: Kracoski v. … This conclusion was not modified by the Board.

Jones v. Jones

438 Pa. Super. 26 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1994

In Brown v. Hall, our Supreme Court rejected this assertion in all but two limited situations. 495 Pa. 635, 642-44 , 435 A.2d 859, 863 (1981). … Brown, 495 Pa. at 642-44 , 435 A.2d at 863 ; Millstein v. Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495, 498-500 , 457 A.2d 1291, 1293 (1983). Therefore, the amount of support in the separation agreement is a floor, not a ceiling. Id.

Commonwealth v. One Studebaker Sedan

140 Pa. Super. 197 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1940

The Board appealed. The judgment must be reversed. … See United States v. Brig Malek Adhel, 2 How. 210, 233, 234; Dobbins’ Distillery v. United States, 96 U. S. 395 ; Goldsmith-Grant Co. v. United States, 254 U. S. 505, 509-513 ; Com. v. One Chrysler Coupe, 101 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Saurbaugh

194 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1961

M., she was operating -a brown-colored 1951 Kaiser automobile in an easterly direction on East Princess Street in the City of York. … The officer further testified that on the left front bumper of the Saurbaugh car “there was brown paint . . . where it scraped along the fender”.

Radonich v. Pine Hill Coal Co.

158 Pa. Super. 636 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1945

L. 691, paragraph 1, 77 PS 877, provides: “Any court before whom an appeal is pending from any action of the board may remit the record to the board for more specific findings of fact, if the findings of the board or referee … These appeals are ruled by the decision of this court in Behanna v. Meyers et al., 158 Pa.

Marmon v. Union Collieries Co.

135 Pa. Super. 582 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1939

v. … Superior *586 Ct. 275, 189 A. 789 ; Plum v. Hotel Washington, supra; Johnson v. Jeddo Highland C. Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 94, 98 ; Telario v. Jeff. & Ind. Coal Co., 105 Pa.

Leigh v. James J. Clearkin, Inc.

197 Pa. Super. 564 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1962

Greap v. Oberdorff, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 153 , 113 A. 2d 339 ; Messikomer v. Baldwin Locomotive Works, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 537 , 115 A. 2d 853 . … In determining this question we must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellees, since they have the benefit of the Board’s decision. Moore v. MacArthur Pile Corporation, 193 Pa.

Smith v. PULL-STAND. CAR MFG. CO.

194 Pa. Super. 263 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

The circumstances of the instant case required unequivocal medical testimony: Anthony v. Lee Coal Co., 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 397 , 77 A. 2d 657 . See also Meehan v. Philadelphia, 182 Pa. … In support of his third contention, appellant cites Gavula v. Sims Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 206 , 38 A. 2d 482 , and Bogan v. Smoothway Const. Co., 183 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 , 130 A. 2d 207 .

Hall v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Co.

79 Pa. Super. 303 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1922

as her reason that she desired to purchase a property and establish a boarding house. … The court below seems t'o have relied upon the case of Lovasz v.

Commonwealth v. Maxwell

2007 Pa. Super. 270 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 28, 2007

Booth v. … Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 887 A.2d 831 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005) (same). Finally, in Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth of Penna. v. Ahlgrim

98 Pa. Super. 595 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 11, 1930

Wallace, 114 Pa. 405 ; Commonwealth v. Steimling, 156 Pa. 400 ; Commonwealth v. Coble, 9 Pa. Superior Ct. 215 ; Commonwealth v. Preston, 92 Pa. Superior Ct. 159 ; Commonwealth v. Benson, 94 Pa. Superior Ct. 10 . … Superior Ct. 230 ; Commonwealth v. Dickinson, 62 Pa. Superior Ct. 468 .

Sellmer v. Ringling

62 Pa. Super. 410 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 1, 1916

Her testimony is to the effect, that as she trod on a board it gave way under her and her foot was pinched between two boards, one of which overlapped, the other. … Sheets v. Sunbury, Etc., Rwy. Co., 237 Pa. 153 .

Com. v. Landis, W.

277 A.3d 1172 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 2022

Brown and Ms. Johnson told police. … Commonwealth v. Sullivan, 820 A.2d 795, 807 (Pa. Super. -8- J-A05036-22 2003) (citing Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, and Commonwealth v. Brown, 648 A.2d 1177 (Pa. 1994)).

Com. v. Nixon, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2016

Brown, 648 A.2d at 1189. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 484 A.2d 738, 741 (Pa. 1984).

McGurty v. Ruskin Dining Room

153 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1943

As she was the moving party the burden was on her to convince the board the ulcers were due to her fall by definite and positive evidence. Seitzinger v. Fort Pitt Brewing Company, 294 Pa. 253 , 144 A. 79 ; Pelosi v. … The conflict in the medical testimony and the credibility of the witnesses were for consideration of the board, Yerko v. Clearfield Bituminous Coal Corporation, 145 Pa. Superior 269, 21 A. 2d 97 .

Commonwealth v. Phillips

183 Pa. Super. 377 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

As Hicks boarded the bus, with his back to the door, he was struck on the back of the neck and head, his arms were pinned to his side, and he was dragged backward to the sidewalk. … Com. v. Brown, 309 Pa. 515, 522 , 164 A. 726 .

Downs v. Linton's Lunch

134 Pa. Super. 248 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1938

See Higgins v. Com. C. & C. Co. et al., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 1, 11 , 161 A. 745 ; Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 163 A. 63 . … The amendment allowed by the board to the petition of December 6,1933, seems to distinguish this case from the recent one of Calabria v.

Beck v. Container Corp. of America

207 Pa. Super. 456 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1966

The Board affirmed the Referee’s order of disallowance. The Court of Common Pleas of' Montgomery County • sustained the decision of the Board, and entered judgment for the employer. This appeal followed. E. … In the case of Morgan v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., 204 Pa.