Case law

Commonwealth v. Green

290 Pa. Super. 76 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 14, 1981

See, e. g., Commonwealth v. Brown, 482 Pa. 130 , 393 A.2d 414 (1978) (motive for prior killing identical with that for instant killing); Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Roman, 465 Pa. 515, 527 , 351 A.2d 214, 220 (1976). See also Commonwealth v. Brown, 280 Pa.Super. 303 , 421 A.2d 734 (1980).

Christensen v. Rust Engineering Co.

189 Pa. Super. 88 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

Cunningham v. Guerrina & Sons, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 288 (1958). “It is not our duty to reconcile conflicting medical testimony nor to review as a matter of law the credibility of medical witnesses.” Visnic v. … See also: Gasior v. Pittsburgh, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 371 , 146 A. 2d 320 (1958).

Braun v. Target Corp.

2009 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 2009

Lombardo v. … Wu v.

Berlin v. Crawford

86 Pa. Super. 283 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1925

The question is one of law reviewable by the courts (Stahl v. Watson Coal Co., 268 Pa. 452, 454 ; Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56, 62 ; Houlehan v. … It was stated in Riley v.

Iezzi v. Creamer Construction Co.

200 Pa. Super. 265 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 333 , 24 A. 2d 51 (1942) ; Seisek v. Blaw-Knox Co., 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 347, 349 , 162 A. 2d 33 (1960). The answer to this question is in the affirmative. … It was within the province of the board to weigh conflicting expert testimony as to cause of death, and to ac *268 cept or reject that of any witness. Malik v. Union town, 172 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Black

2015 Pa. Super. 7 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 13, 2015

There’s what they call a count board. … See Commonwealth v. Fountain, 811 A.2d 24, 25 (Pa.

Schrock v. Stonycreek Coal Co.

152 Pa. Super. 599 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1943

The only question before us is whether there is competent evidence to support the findings of fact of the board and whether the law has been properly applied to them. Kuca v. … Railroad Co., 277 Pa. 382 , 121 A. 325 ; Fillip v. Wm. Cramp & Sons Co., 80 Pa. Superior Ct. 68 ; Zelazny v. Seneca Coal Mining Co., 275 Pa. 397 , 119 A. 487 ; Hunter v.

Flynn Unemployment Compensation Case

192 Pa. Super. 251 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1960

Superior Ct. 46 , 49 A. 2d 847 ; Layton v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 156 Pa. Superior Ct. 225 , 40 A. 2d 125 . Appellant seeks to bring herself within this second exception to the general rule. … Specific findings were made in Tuttle Unemployment Compensation Case, supra, and in the case of Horton v. West Penn Power Co., 119 Pa. Superior Ct. 465 , 180 A. 56 .

Keys Unemployment Compensation Case

183 Pa. Super. 164 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

Keys, from a decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review dismissing his appeal to the board from a referee’s finding of ineligibility. … Gillis v. Public Service Commission, 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 389, 394 , 161 A. 563 .

Lucas v. Walters Milling Co.

116 Pa. Super. 171 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1934

As Judge Cunningham said in Jones v. United Iron & Metal Co., 99 Pa. … There is no evidence that this question was called to the attention of the Workmen’s Compensation Board or the court below, and it is too late, therefore, for defendant to raise the question before us: Dunlap v.

Commonwealth v. Tookes

236 Pa. Super. 386 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 22, 1975

Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89, 91 , 85 S. Ct. 223 , 13 L. Ed. 2d 142 (1964); Commonwealth v. Murray, 437 Pa. 326, 329 , 263 A.2d 886 (1970); Commonwealth v. Brayboy, 431 Pa. 365, 369 , 246 A.2d 675 (1968). … Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98 , 80 S. Ct. 168 , 4 L. Ed. 2d 134 (1951). The situation in the case before us is distinguishable from the situation in Commonwealth v.

In re Financial Statement of School District

75 Pa. Super. 434 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1921

Com’rs v. County of Lycoming, 46 Pa. 496 ; see also Wayne Co. v. Waller, 90 Pa. 99, 103 . … teacher may not recover: see Waltman v.

Thomas v. Robinson

162 Pa. Super. 454 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1948

Stasevicius v. Slauzis et al., 144 Pa. Superior. Ct. 421, 423, 19 A. 2d 569 ; Arcutt v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen et al., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 385, 388 , 43 A. 2d 599 ; Grant v. … In Brown v.

Weissman v. Phila. Electric Co.

111 Pa. Super. 353 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1933

Judge Fronefieed refers to the case of Lacey v. … See also opinion of our Brother Parker in McFadden v. Lehigh Nav. C. Co., 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 501 . The order of the lower court reversing the order made by the Workmen’s Compensation Board is affirmed.

Werner v. Allegheny County

153 Pa. Super. 10 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1943

The board found that deceased stood in loco parentis to her two grandchildren, and that they were members of her household at the time of her death. As we have said in Brovdy et al. v. … Appellants concede that the board could do this. See section 426 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1915, as amended by Act of June 21, 1939, P. L. 520, §1, 77 PS §871; Manley v. Lycoming Motors Corp. et al., 83 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Hewlett

223 Pa. Super. 55 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1972

Commonwealth v. Brown, 443 Pa. 274 , 278 A. 2d 170 (1971), Commonwealth v. Wrona, 442 Pa. 201 , 275 A. 2d 78 (1971). … See Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, at 278, U.S. ex rel. Olden v. Rundle, 279 F. Supp. 153 (E.D. Pa. 1968), Bauers v. Yeager, supra.

Mikanowicz Unemployment Compensation Case

178 Pa. Super. 612 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

Seroskie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 470 , 82 A. 2d 558 . … Kaylock v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 376 , 67 A. 2d 801 . We agree with the Board that the emotional upset of claimant here falls short of this test.

McCann v. Cross Bros. Meat Packers, Inc.

205 Pa. Super. 255 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1965

The Referee awarded compensation; the Board affirmed the Referee; and the Court of Common Pleas sustained the Board. … The credibility of medical witnesses and the weight of their testimony are matters finally and exclusively for the Board. Kish v. Steele Coal Co., 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 257 , 137 A. 2d 855 (1958). Order affirmed.

Brandenburg v. J. Boos Dairies

105 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1931

Hecla *28 Coal & Coke Co., 296 Pa. 34 , no one saw the deceased fall, hut the board had the right to draw the proper inferences as to what caused his death: Krischunas v. P. & R. C. & I. Co., 296 Pa. 216 ; Labuck v. … In Zelazny v.

Com. v. Carey, R.

2021 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2021

Commonwealth v. Means, 614 A.2d 220, 223 (Pa. 1992); see also Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 26 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted).