Case law

Reading Trust Co. Tax Assessment Case

143 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1940

This record clearly discloses that a taxpayer will not know exactly when the board has acted on his appeal until some notice of the fact is given to him. Boards of revision are quasi-judicial bodies (Moore v. … See Graham v. Commissioners of Lawrence County, 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 245, 251 ; Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.’s Assessment, 225 Pa. 272, 275-276 .

Telario v. Jefferson & Indiana Coal Co.

105 Pa. Super. 305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1932

the board for further hearing and determination.” … Piper v. Adams Express Co. 270 Pa. 54, 62 ; Bausch v. Fidler, 277 Pa. 573, 579 ; Johnson v. Jeddo Highland Coal Co., 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 94, 99 ; Keifer v. Philadelphia & R. C. & I. Co., 102 Pa. Superior Ct. 235, 240 .

Commonwealth ex rel. Rubin v. Rubin

230 Pa. Super. 591 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 23, 1974

As we said in McFarland v. McFarland, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 342, 346 , 107 A. 2d 615 (1954): “A divorce from bed and board is no more than a judicial separation. … V, Section 5 of the Pennsylvania Constitution.

Commonwealth v. Michenfelder

268 Pa. Super. 424 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 10, 1979

Persons sentenced to a maximum term of less than two years are expressly excluded from the jurisdiction of the Board of Parole. Id. at 331.17. In Commonwealth v. … 'But see Commonwealth v. Greenlee, 263 Pa.Super. 477 , 398 A.2d 676 (1979).

Combs v. Cole Brothers Circus, Inc.

165 Pa. Super. 346 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1949

As stated in Healey v. Hudson Coal Co., 130 Pa. … The board found “such transportation was for the benefit of the employer.”

Thompson Et Ux. v. Refowich

85 Pa. Super. 248 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 2, 1924

house under a léase as a member of the lessee’s family, for an injury resulting from the defective condition of *251 the steps leading into the house, in the absenee of any covenant for repairs by the landlord: Robinson v. … Her husband testified that he noticed a crack in the board, at the place where it subsequently broke, within two weeks after the board had been placed upon the step; that at the time the board was put in he did not “think

Eckenroad v. Rochester & Pittsburgh Coal Co.

149 Pa. Super. 257 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1942

J., in Paydo v. Union Collieries Co., 146 Pa. … Glen Alden Coal Co., 332 Pa. 410 , 3 A. 2d 381 , and Crispin v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Trevethan v. Myers

189 Pa. Super. 621 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

Salerno v. Banmiller, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 149 A. 2d 501 (1959). After serving a year of this sentence, the prisoner petitioned the Board of Parole for a parole to start serving his back time. … Biglow v. Ashe, 348 Pa. 409, 410 , 35 A. 2d 340 (1944); Commonwealth ex rel. Salerno v. Banmiller, supra, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 149 A. 2d 501 (1959).

Ludwick's Appeal

117 Pa. Super. 471 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1934

The board accordingly refused to fix a salary for him. On appeal, the court of common pleas sustained the action of the board. … We will, therefore, consider the whole record with regard to the regularity and propriety of the proceedings and determine the right of the court to make the order complained of: Sterrett v.

Leopold Tax Assessment Case

118 Pa. Super. 158 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1935

This case was followed by Schmuck v. … Gould v. Gould, 245 U. S. 151, 153 ; United States v. Merriam, 263 U. S. 179 , 188”: Com. v. P. R. T. Co., 287 Pa. 190, 196 , 134 A. 455 .

Gaughan v. Commonwealth

208 Pa. Super. 406 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1966

Angermier v. Hubley Manufacturing Co., 206 Pa. Superior Ct. 422, 427 , 213 A. 2d 171, 174 (1965). … Witt v. Witt's Food Market, 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 557 , 186 A. 275 (1936).

Flood v. Logan Iron & Steel Co.

136 Pa. Super. 101 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1939

The board made no finding one way or the other on that fundamental inquiry. … Each side is entitled to specific findings by the board upon those issues. The present situation is comparable with that which existed in O’Donnell v. S. Fayette Twp. School District, supra.

Commonwealth v. Rawls

276 Pa. Super. 89 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1980

Parker v. Randolph, 442 U.S. 62, 75, fn. 7 , 99 S.Ct. 2132, 2140, fn. 7 , 60 L.Ed.2d 713 (1979); Commonwealth v. Brown, 444 Pa. 318 , 282 A.2d 364 (1971). … Accordingly, we cannot say the reference reflected in any way upon the appellant in the manner found offensive in Mimms and Brown.

Walker Et Ux. v. Walker

153 Pa. Super. 20 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 13, 1943

Ellis v. American Academy of Music, 120 Pa. 608 , 15 A. 494 ; Saccone v. West End Trust Company, 224 Pa. 554 , 73 A. 971 ; Oliver v. Ormsby, 224 Pa. 564 , 73 A. 973 ; Rhoads v. Walter, 61 Pa. Superior Ct. 43, 47 . … Whitaker v. Brown, 46 Pa. 197 ; Richardson v. Clements, 89 Pa. 503 ; Kister v. Reeser, 98 Pa. 1 ; Danner v. Elliott, 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 350 . This he completely *25 failed to do.

Widdis v. Collingdale Millwork Co.

169 Pa. Super. 612 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 15, 1951

Commonwealth v. Williams, 307 Pa. 134, 144 , 160 A. 602 ; Commonwealth v. Santos, 275 Pa. 515, 521, 522 , 119 A. 596 ; Ryman’s Case, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 212, 221, 222 , 11 A. 2d 677 . … The Board ignored the opinion of claimant’s medical expert, as it had the right to do in the exercise of its function as the ultimate fact finding tribunal (Walsh v. Penn Anth. Mining Co., 147 Pa.

Commonwealth v. West

440 Pa. Super. 575 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 28, 1995

In Commonwealth v. … We find the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Brown to be instructive in the instant ease.

Commonwealth v. Gambit

274 Pa. Super. 571 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 25, 1980

He sought advice from Kenneth Brown, an assistant district attorney on duty at the station. Brown concluded that grounds existed for a search of the car. … Reiff and Brown walked down the hall to the magistrate’s office where, they believed, the arraignment was in progress.

Fox v. American News Co.

190 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 10, 1959

The board, on appeal, affirmed the referee, and the court below affirmed the board. … Rodgers v. Methodist Episcopal Hospital, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 , 145 A. 2d 893 ; Zilek v. C. C. Coal Company, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 628 , 142 A. 2d 507 ; Irvin v. Plymouth Meeting Rubber Division Linear, 182 Pa.

Golinski v. Odin Stove Manufacturing Co.

159 Pa. Super. 457 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1946

McGarvey v. Butler Consolidated Coal Co. et al., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 353, 356 , 43 A. 2d 623 ; Jaloneck v. Jarecki Mfg. Co. et al., 157 Pa. … We recognize that it is essential in the present case that the board’s findings of fact be consistent with each other and with its conclusions of law and its order. Jaloneck v. Jarecki Mfg. Co. et al., supra, p. 615.

Naida v. Russell Mining Co.

159 Pa. Super. 155 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1946

Martz v. Butler County Mushroom Farm, Inc., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 276 , 27 A. 2d 765 . The board is not required to accept even uncontroverted testimony as true. Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. … (Seitzinger v. Fort Pitt Brewing Company, 294 Pa. 253 , 144 A. 79 ), and the *159 board concluded that claimant had not met his burden of proof.