Case law

Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.

194 Pa. Super. 263 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

The circumstances of the instant case required unequivocal medical testimony: Anthony v. Lee Coal Co., 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 397 , 77 A. 2d 657 . See also Meehan v. Philadelphia, 182 Pa. … In support of his third contention, appellant cites Gavula v. Sims Co., 155 Pa. Superior Ct. 206 , 38 A. 2d 482 , and Bogan v. Smoothway Const. Co., 183 Pa. Superior Ct. 170 , 130 A. 2d 207 .

Burkholder v. Hutchison

403 Pa. Super. 498 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1991

Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc., 255 Pa.Super. 28 , 386 A.2d 119 (1978) (employee could not be discharged for performing jury duty); Hunter v. … Borough of Blawnox Council v. Olszewski, 505 Pa. 176 , 477 A.2d 1322 (1984). It appears clear to us that at the time of their required annual meeting in January, 1987, the board of supervisors of St.

Sabatelli Unemployment Compensation Case

168 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 22, 1950

therefore, the order of the board cannot be sustained. … Kasanovich v. George, 348 Pa. 199, 203 , 34 A. 2d 523 ; 38 Am. Jur., Negligence, §48, p. 692-694; 55 Yale Law Journal, p. 162 (1945); 2, Restatement, Torts, §282, comment (d).

Shadyside Hospital Appeal

207 Pa. Super. 261 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1966

In County of Lancaster v. Y.W.C.A. of Lancaster, 92 Pa. … Lycoming House v. Board of Revision of Taxes of the City and County of Philadelphia, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 538 , 67 A. 2d 646 (1949); The United Presbyterian Women’s Association of North America v.

Weinberg v. Morgan

186 Pa. Super. 322 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

Gettier v. Friday, 375 Pa. 206, 208 , 99 A. 2d 899 ; Brown & Bigelow, Inc. v. Borish, 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 308, 310 , 67 A. 2d 823 ." Stein v. Greene, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 464, 467 , 116 A. 2d 308, 310 . … Brown v. McClure Newspaper Syndicate, 183 Pa. Superior Ct. 316 , 130 A. 2d 721 ; Berger v. Pittsburgh Auto Equipment Company, 387 Pa. 61, 62 , 127 A. 2d 334 ; Fogel Refrigerator Company v.

Jericho v. Liggett Spring & Axle Co.

176 Pa. Super. 128 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 13, 1954

The Workmen’s Compensation Board and the lower court relied upon Augustine v. Evert Lumber Co., 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 167 , 3 A. 2d 284 . … In the Harrington v. Mayflower Mfg.

Gish v. Exley

153 Pa. Super. 653 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 1943

In Fleming v. Prospect Park Board of Adjustment, 318 Pa. 582 , 178 A. 813 , the court of common pleas affirmed the board of adjustment in refusing to issue a permit for the construction of garages. … Where an official body in its administrative capacity has acted upon a matter properly before it we do not reverse except for substantial reasons constituting a manifest and' flagrant abuse of discretion: Perelman et al. v.

Berdy v. Glen Alden Corp.

202 Pa. Super. 525 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1964

the board. … Elonis v. Lytle Coal Company, 134 Pa. Superior Ct. 264 , 3 A. 2d 995 ; Fink v. Sheldon Axle and Spring Company, 270 Pa. 476 , 113 A. 666 . Cf. Blasczak v. Crown Cork and Seal Company, Inc., 193 Pa.

Shaffer v. Somerset Community Hospital

205 Pa. Super. 419 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1965

See also Dougherty v. Bernstein & Son, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 587 , 52 A. 2d 370 . The case of Young v. Hamilton Watch Co., 158 Pa. … She was on the premises of her employer when she was injured, and the Board so found. The fact that her actual duties were in the hospital building itself does not affect her right to compensation. Cf. Grazer v.

Gensey Unemployment Compensation Case

165 Pa. Super. 457 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1949

We are of the opinion that under Mills Unemployment Compensation Case (Department of Labor and Industry v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review), 362 Pa. 342 , 67 A. 2d 114 , the bureau was without authority to appeal from the decision of the referee to the board, and that the decision of the board under the circumstances

Penelope Club Liquor License Case

136 Pa. Super. 505 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 1939

No appeal was taken by the licensee from the action of the board revoking its license. The appellant surety was not, nor was it entitled to be, a party to the revocation proceeding. Com. v. McMenamin et al., 122 Pa. … Appellant, although not entitled to notice of the revocation proceedings or to be made a party thereto, (Com. v. McMenamin, supra; Com. v. Kosutic et al., 122 Pa.

Fulton v. Philadelphia Rustproof Co.

200 Pa. Super. 467 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1963

Of course the credibility of the witnesses and the weight of conflicting evidence on factual questions are exclusively for the board: Thorn v. … Board should.be affirmed.

Holt v. Sunray Electric, Inc.

186 Pa. Super. 594 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

In Hollenbach v. North, Wales Foundry Company, 184 Pa. … In Gawlick v. Glen Alden Coal Company, 178 Pa.

Com. v. Urwin, R.

219 A.3d 167 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 10, 2019

See 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9544(b); see also Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 161 A.3d 960, 965 (Pa. Super. 2017).

Marshall v. ALTOONA

208 Pa. Super. 465 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1966

In Mancini v. Pennsylvania Rubber Company, 147 Pa. … To the same effect see Spina v. Gahagan Construction Corporation, 184 Pa. Superior Ct. 420 , 135 A. *471 2d 760 (1957); Hendricks v. Patterson, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 584 , 67 A. 2d 652 (1949); Yanik v.

Commonwealth v. McKenna

206 Pa. Super. 317 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

Commonwealth v. Brown, 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 226 , 44 A. 2d 524 (1945). … Commonwealth v. Brown, supra. Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Commonwealth ex rel. Ruczynski v. Powers

206 Pa. Super. 415 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1965

Harry v. Eastridge, 374 Pa. 172, 177 , 97 A. 2d 350 (1953).” Judge Brown, in her long and distinguished career on the bench of the County Court of Philadelphia, has heard thousands of these cases. … Judge Brown concluded: “We are well impressed with the character, good intentions and sincerity of purpose of the foster parents.

Smith v. A. De O. Rossiter & Sons Co.

158 Pa. Super. 128 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 25, 1945

Bowers v. Schell’s Bakery et al., 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 112, 115 , 31 A. 2d 442 ; Mancuso v. Mancuso et al., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 22, 24 , 27 A. 2d 779 ; Apker v. Crown Can Co. et al., 150 Pa. … See Frederick v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co. et al., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 581, 585 , 176 A. 60 ; Corrento v. Ventresca et al., 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 358, 363 , 19 A. 2d 746 .

Oravec Unemployment Compensation Case

171 Pa. Super. 491 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

Gollier v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 162 Pa. Superior Ct. 136 , 56 A. 2d 351 . … “A judgment, to be conclusive in a subsequent suit on tbe same cause of action between the same parties, must have been on tbe merits of tbe case”: Moore v. Schell, 99 Pa. Superior Ct. 81, 84 ; Fleming v.

Commonwealth v. Ritz

311 Pa. Super. 437 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1983

a brown bag and some miscellaneous items containing marihuana residue. … Commonwealth v. DeMichel, 442 Pa. 553 , 277 A.2d 159 (1975).