Case law

Fumea Liquor License Case

186 Pa. Super. 609 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

See Commonwealth v. Nunamaker, 84 Pa. Superior Ct. 97 ; Commonwealth v. Harris, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 59 , 140 A. 2d 344 . … Superior Ct. 473 , 34 A. 2d 326 ; Turner v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 , 53 A. 2d 849 ; Reiter Liquor License Case, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 552 , 98 A. 2d 465 .

Shumkas v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

101 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1930

Groner, 258 Pa. 473, 478 ; Blake v. … : Callihan v.

Commonwealth v. Wise

171 A.3d 784 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 2017

Commonwealth v. Scott, 73 A.3d 599, 602 (Pa. Super. 2013) (quoting Brown, 911 A.2d at 583 ). … Ratsamy, 594 Pa. 176 , 934 A.2d 1233 (2007); Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544 (Pa. Super. 2011).

Roeschen v. Dietrich

107 Pa. Super. 298 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1932

Claimant promptly appealed to the board. … (See also Putt v. Laher Ice Cream Co. et al., *303 105 Pa. Superior Ct. 536 ).

Her-Bell, Inc. Liquor License Case

176 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1954

In refusing the transfer the Board found: “1. … See Philadelphia v. Overbrook Park Congregation, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 581 , 91 A. 2d 310 .

Brush v. ST. UNIV. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC.

249 Pa. Super. 164 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 29, 1977

Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 , 92 S.Ct. 2294 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 (1972); Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 , 86 S.Ct. 719 , 15 L.Ed.2d 637 (1966). … As noted in Isaacs v. Board of Trustees of Temple University, 385 F.Supp. 473, 476 (E.D.Pa. 1974), ". . .

Pellegrino v. Consumers Mining Co.

162 Pa. Super. 119 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1947

See Groner v. Board of Public Education of the City of Pittsburgh, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 381, 383 , 33 A. 2d 271 . … The board accepted the latter testimony. It was not shown that there was any other injury or any disability not resulting from the loss of the two fingers. See Bordick v. John Conlon Coal Co., 144 Pa.

Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.

432 Pa. Super. 295 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1994

Jackson v. … Hanavan v.

Fuller Unemployment Compensation Case

159 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1946

Opinion by Reno, J., The board found that the claimant, Kathryn V. … Upon her appeal, the referee reversed the bureau, and his decision was affirmed by the board upon the employer’s appeal.

Beck v. Germantown Cricket Club

37 Pa. Super. 521 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1908

In Lohr v. … See also Borough of Easton v. Neff, 102 Pa. 474 .

Blasczak v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.

193 Pa. Super. 422 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960

Kasman v. Hillman C. & C. Co., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 263, 266 , 27 A. 2d 762 (1942); Widdis v. Collingdale Millwork Co., supra. This is-a question of fact for .the board. … We must, sustain the board’s findings of fact if there is competent evidence to ■ support them. Koza v. U. S. Steel Corp., 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 151 A. 2d 823 (1959); Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co., 192 Pa.

Witters v. Harrisburg Steel Corporation

183 Pa. Super. 450 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

Upon appeal to the Workmen’s Compensation Board the decision of- the Referee was affirmed. … L. 566, 77 P.S. 1201 et seq. 2 Witters v.

Spring-Ford Area School District Division Case

210 Pa. Super. 338 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1967

The appeal cites the case of Sailors v. Board of Education, 387 U.S. 105 , 87 S.Ct. 1549 , 18 L. ed. 21 650, decided May 22, 1967, for the proposition that such principle does not apply to school boards. … The Supreme Court assumed that the requirements of Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368 , 83 S.Ct. 801 , 9 L. ed. 2d 821, and Reynolds v.

Lieberman v. Sunray Drug Co.

204 Pa. Super. 348 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 12, 1964

We have held many times that the board has broad powers to grant a rehearing Avhen justice requires it. Greeby v. Phila. Asbestos Co., 120 Pa. Superior Ct. 9 , 181 A. 452 (1935) ; Conti v. … Also it is for the referee and the board to determine the weight of the testimony. Birosak v. Shawnee Inn, 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 652 , 184 A. 2d 120 (1962).

Walatka v. Levin

100 Pa. Super. 489 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 7, 1930

In Fremont Lodge v. … Rep. 994; Houck v. Bobrow Bro. Inc., 3 Pa. D. & C. Rep. 766; Skokan v. Em Lou Coal Co., 1 D. & C. (Pa.) 456-458.

Adams v. Ford

3 Pa. Super. 239 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 18, 1897

This being so, the board had the right to take the next step and order the well filled with clean earth.- *243 In Philadelphia v. … We think not; this case is ruled by Kennedy v. Board of Health, supra. The judgment of the court below is affirmed.

Miller v. Sch. Dist. of N. Versailles.

123 Pa. Super. 65 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1936

V, §554 (24 PS §605), the board of school directors of the school district of North Versailles township, which is a third class school district, shall determine the commission or compensation to be paid to the school tax … Such act, in itself, discloses no abuse of discretion nor an unreasonable performance of duty on the part of the board. Appellant cites as authority for her contention the case of Mason v.

Damon v. Berger

191 Pa. Super. 165 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1959

Morrison v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 256, 258 , 15 A. 2d 391, 392 . See, also, Griffith Will, 358 Pa. 474, 481 , 57 A. 2d 893 . … It would appear that the mere failure of the board to comply with this provision should not render the award void or visit upon the plaintiffs a penalty for the technical dereliction of the board. In Boone v.

DiRocco Liquor License Case

167 Pa. Super. 381 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

(Emphasis added.) *386 In Calvary Presbyterian Church v. State Liquor Authority, 281 N. Y. S. 81, affirmed in 270 N. … In Smith v. Ballas, 335 Ill. App. 418 , 82 N.

Harascak v. Department of Highways

217 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1970

It is the function of the Workmen’s Compensation Board to decide all questions of fact and the function of the courts to decide the questions of law. Vorbnoff v. … Barrett v. Otis Elevator Co., 431 Pa. 446 , 246 A. 2d 668 (1968); Peron v. Phoenix Park Goal Co., 202 Pa. Superior Ct. 495 , 198 A. 2d 370 (1964).