Case law

Commonwealth v. Robinson

361 Pa. Super. 87 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 6, 1987

As noted by this court’s opinion in Brown , the Supreme Court in Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 351 Pa.Super. at 128 , 505 A.2d at 299 ; quoting Commonwealth v. Morris, 493 Pa. 164, 176 , 425 A.2d 715, 720-721 .

Valent v. Berwind-White Coal Mining Co.

172 Pa. Super. 305 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1953

Superior Ct. 227, 234 , 42 A. 2d 280 ; Nickolay v. Hudson Coal Co., 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 550 , 67 A. 2d 828 ; Tracey v. M. & S. Coal Co., Inc., 165 Pa. Superior Ct. 569 , 69 A. 2d 184 ; Coma v. Hudson Coal Co., 166 Pa. … Nickolay v. Hudson Coal Co., supra. The order is reversed, and the record is remitted to the court below with directions to remand it to the Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Holtz v. McGraw & Bindley

161 Pa. Super. 371 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1947

Superior Ct. 128 , 8 A. 2d 799 ; Chubb v. Allegheny Country Club et al., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 146 , 24 A. 2d 550 ; Johnston v. Butler *375 Railways Company et al., 149 Pa. … See helpful review of Judge Hirt in Kelemon v. Reiber, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 169 , 53 A. 2d 903 .

Kovach v. Union Drawn Steel Co.

99 Pa. Super. 302 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 5, 1930

See Donley v. Semans, 260 Pa. 88 .” … Here, as well as in the Jones case, the expert went far beyond “giving abstract scientific advice to enable the referee or the board to better understand the evidence before them” (Seitzinger v. Ft.

I. B. P. O. E. Liquor License Case

163 Pa. Super. 395 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1948

See Com. v. Lyons, 142 Pa. … The order of the court below is reversed, and the order of the board is reinstated. Costs to be paid by appellee.

Bethel Township Veterans Home Ass'n Liquor License Case

180 Pa. Super. 159 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 17, 1956

In Luzerne County v. … Chase v.

Commonwealth v. Kriner

234 Pa. Super. 230 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1975

Commonwealth v. Klock, 230 Pa. Superior Ct. 563 , 327 A.2d 375 (1974); Commonwealth v. Jacoby, 226 Pa. Superior Ct. 19 , 311 A.2d 666 (1973); Commonwealth v. Brown, 225 Pa. … Probable cause to believe that the accused is operating the vehicle cannot be supplied by statements of witnesses, Commonwealth v. *235 Brown, supra, or by an incriminating statement of the driver, Commonwealth v.

Howard v. McClane

146 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1941

Superior Ct. 37, 48 , 17 A. 2d 732 , and Metalko v. Ford Collieries Co., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 206 , 22 A. 2d 222 ), to justify the findings of the board. … The conflict between the testimony of the daughter and that of the insurance adjuster was entirely for the board. As was said in Kelly et ux. v. Hudson Coal Company, 119 Pa.

Graham v. Comm. of Lawrence Co.

99 Pa. Super. 245 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1930

to the board of.revision of taxes: Phila. v. … Co. v.

Bako Unemployment Compensation Case

171 Pa. Super. 222 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

For accordant decisions in other jurisdictions on provisions in statutes similar to §402(d), see Saunders v. Md. Unemployment Compensation Bd., 188 Md. 677 , 53 A. 2d 579 ; American Steel Foundries v. … E. 2d 465 ; Carnegie-Illinois Steel Corp. v. Review Board, 117 Ind. App. 379 , 72 N. E. 2d 662 ; Chrysler Corporation v. Review Board, 120 Ind. App. 425 , 92 N. E. 2d 565 .

Ristine v. MOORE

190 Pa. Super. 610 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1959

The sole question on this appeal is whether the finding of fact by the board can be supported by competent and substantial evidence. Koza v. United States Steel Corporation, 190 Pa. … Diehl v. Keystone Alloys Company, supra; Curran v. Walter E. Knipe and Sons, Inc., 185 Pa..Superior Ct. 540, 138 A. 2d 251 ; Litman v. Litman, 185 Pa. Superior Ct. 69 , 137 A. 2d 918 .

Alco Parking Corp. v. Public Parking Auth. of Pittsburgh

706 A.2d 343 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 15, 1998

See Innes v. School District of Nanticoke, 842 Pa. 433 , 20 A.2d 225, 227-228 (1941); Pittsburgh Baseball, Inc. v. … Turnway Corp. v. Soffer, 461 Pa. 447, 462 , 336 A.2d 871, 878 (1975). Al Hamilton Contracting Co. v. Cowder, 434 Pa.Super. 491 , 644 A.2d 188, 190 (1994); see also Renee Beauty Salons, Inc. v.

Dindino v. Weekly Review Publishing Co.

188 Pa. Super. 606 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 18, 1959

to the Board and the Board is hereby directed to render an award consistent with this opinion and order”. … The responsibility of weighing the evidence is cast on the referee and the compensation board”: Corcoran v. Pennsylvania Coal Co., 76 Pa. Superior Ct. 325 . In the words of Judge Ekvin in Carter v. Vecchione, 183 Pa.

Commonwealth ex rel. Clawges v. Claudy

173 Pa. Super. 410 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

The effect of the general sentence was to subject relator automatically to confinement for the full term, unless sooner released by action of the Board of Parole: Com. ex rel. Williamson v. Burke, 172 Pa. … Tbe powers of tbe Board of Managers, later Board of Trustees, of tbe school were transferred to tbe Pennsylvania Board, of Parole by virtue of tbe Act of 1941, as amended: Com. ex rel. Brough v. Burke, supra.

Pesognelli Liquor License Case

191 Pa. Super. 320 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

Gre en et al. v. Milk Control Commission, 340 Pa. 1 , 16 A. 2d 9 , citing Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service Commission, 271 Pa. 39 , 114 A. 642 ; Swarthmore Borough v. … In a similar proceeding we held that no right existed in the Workmen’s Compensation Board to entertain a “nunc pro tunc” filing of a claim: Pickens v. State Workmen’s Insurance Fund et al., 140 Pa.

Walton v. Harold M. Kelly, Inc.

218 Pa. Super. 28 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 1970

Wall v. Penn Lumber and Mill Works, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 512 , 90 A. 2d 273 (1952) . In Mature v. Angelo, 373 Pa. 593 , 97 A. 2d 59 (1953) quoted in Brasel v. Quickway, Inc., 205 Pa. … This conclusion puts the case within the holding of Mature v. Angelo (supra). The terms of the lease are compatible with the facts found by the referee and not overruled by the Board.

Chernetsky v. William Penn Stripping Co.

200 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

evidence in the refusal so to find: Newman v. … See Rettew v. Graybill, 193 Pa. Superior Ct. 564 , 165 A. 2d 424 .

Commonwealth v. Hart

266 Pa. Super. 190 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 18, 1979

Commonwealth v. Hicks, 434 Pa. 153 , 253 A.2d 276 (1969); Commonwealth v. King, 247 Pa.Super. 443 , 372 A.2d 908 (1977). … In Commonwealth v.

Gorski v. Dickson City Borough School District

178 Pa. Super. 158 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 1955

Maxwell v. Farrell School District Board of Directors, 381 Pa. 561, 566 , 112 A. 2d. 192. In Travis v. … To the same effect see Tanenbaum v.

Bakaisa v. Pgh. W. Vir. R.R. Co.

149 Pa. Super. 203 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1942

The order of the court below is reversed and the order of the workmen's compensation board is reinstated. 1 See Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Super. 328 , 333-334 , 24 A.2d 51 ; Coder v. … Super. 407 , 410-412 , 16 A.2d 662 ; Shashura v. Vesta Coal Co., 146 Pa. Super. 161 , 163-165 , 22 A.2d 441 ; Tomshuck v. Wallin Concrete Corp., 146 Pa. Super. 390 , 393-394 , 23 A.2d 74 .