Case law

Shumkas v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

101 Pa. Super. 401 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 8, 1930

Groner, 258 Pa. 473, 478 ; Blake v. … : Callihan v.

Fumea Liquor License Case

186 Pa. Super. 609 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

See Commonwealth v. Nunamaker, 84 Pa. Superior Ct. 97 ; Commonwealth v. Harris, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 59 , 140 A. 2d 344 . … Superior Ct. 473 , 34 A. 2d 326 ; Turner v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 , 53 A. 2d 849 ; Reiter Liquor License Case, 173 Pa. Superior Ct. 552 , 98 A. 2d 465 .

Commonwealth v. Sims

2001 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 2001

Commonwealth v. Ferguson, supra, (citing Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, 411 U.S. at 786 , 93 S.Ct. at 1762 ; Morrissey v. Brewer, supra, 408 U.S. at 489 , 92 S.Ct. 2593 ; Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 503 Pa. 514 , 469 A.2d 1371 (1983) (citing Commonwealth v. Burrell, 497 Pa. 367 , 441 A.2d 744 (1982); Commonwealth v.

Stites v. REX BAR

202 Pa. Super. 587 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1964

Also, it is for the referee and the Board to determine the weight of the evidence. Birosak v. Shawnee Inn et al., 198 Pa. Superior Ct. 652, 660 (1962); Lawrence v. Belmont Fuel Co., 193 Pa. … As stated, those issues are left to the Board’s determination which is controlling in an appeal unless there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence by the Board. Finch v.

Corbeil v. A. & P. STORES

213 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 12, 1968

Justice Stern in Parks v. Miller P. Mach. … As the court below said: “If the Board had rejected Dr. Leventhal’s testimony, we would sustain the Board, since fact finding is within the province of the Board and not this Court. However, the Board did not reject Dr.

Blasczak v. Crown Cork & Seal Co.

193 Pa. Super. 422 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1960

Kasman v. Hillman C. & C. Co., 149 Pa. Superior Ct. 263, 266 , 27 A. 2d 762 (1942); Widdis v. Collingdale Millwork Co., supra. This is-a question of fact for .the board. … We must, sustain the board’s findings of fact if there is competent evidence to ■ support them. Koza v. U. S. Steel Corp., 190 Pa. Superior Ct. 70 , 151 A. 2d 823 (1959); Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co., 192 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Moore

226 Pa. Super. 32 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1973

Commonwealth v. LaRue, 381 Pa. 113 , 112 A. 2d 362 (1955); Commonwealth v. Gibson, 201 Pa. Superior Ct. 573 , 193 A. 2d 690 (1963). … Compare, however, Commonwealth v.

Her-Bell, Inc. Liquor License Case

176 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 30, 1954

In refusing the transfer the Board found: “1. … See Philadelphia v. Overbrook Park Congregation, 171 Pa. Superior Ct. 581 , 91 A. 2d 310 .

Holtz v. McGraw & Bindley

161 Pa. Super. 371 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1947

Superior Ct. 128 , 8 A. 2d 799 ; Chubb v. Allegheny Country Club et al., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 146 , 24 A. 2d 550 ; Johnston v. Butler *375 Railways Company et al., 149 Pa. … See helpful review of Judge Hirt in Kelemon v. Reiber, 161 Pa. Superior Ct. 169 , 53 A. 2d 903 .

Sledzianowski Unemployment Compensation Case

168 Pa. Super. 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1950

It is conceded that the certificate of claimant’s physician “was accepted” by the Board. The testimony of a medical witness even though uncontradicted is not binding on the Board. Stufflet v. … Wolfson v. Unemployment Compensation Board, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 588 , 76 A. 2d 498 .

Damon v. Berger

191 Pa. Super. 165 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 11, 1959

Morrison v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 256, 258 , 15 A. 2d 391, 392 . See, also, Griffith Will, 358 Pa. 474, 481 , 57 A. 2d 893 . … It would appear that the mere failure of the board to comply with this provision should not render the award void or visit upon the plaintiffs a penalty for the technical dereliction of the board. In Boone v.

Artac v. Union Collieries Co.

149 Pa. Super. 449 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1942

See Carson *452 v. Real Estate-Land T. & T. Co., 109 Pa. Superior Ct. 37 , 165 A. 677 ; Stanella v. Scranton Coal Co., supra, 513.” … Salomone v. Pennsylvania Fireworks Display Co., 111 Pa. Superior Ct. 220 , 169 A. 450 ; Russell v. Ralston et al., 133 Pa. Superior Ct. 465 , 3 A. (2d) 13; see Seneca v. Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. et al., 142 Pa.

Fuller Unemployment Compensation Case

159 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1946

Opinion by Reno, J., The board found that the claimant, Kathryn V. … Upon her appeal, the referee reversed the bureau, and his decision was affirmed by the board upon the employer’s appeal.

Commonwealth v. Jones

2005 Pa. Super. 357 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 2005

Commonwealth v. Brown, 875 A.2d 1128, 1133 (Pa.Su *699 per.2005) (quoting Commonwealth v. Hunt, 858 A.2d 1234, 1238 (Pa.Super.2004) (en banc), appeal denied, 583 Pa. 659 , 875 A.2d 1073 (2005)). … See Brown, supra; Pa.R.Crim.P. 600(C).

Hetkowski v. Dickson City Borough School District

141 Pa. Super. 526 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 5, 1940

of the board. … Stowers v. Board of Education of Lincoln County, W. Va., 198 S. E. 522 ; 13 C. J. 644, §719; Hong v. Independent School Dist. No. 245, (Minn.) 232 N. W. 329 ; 72 A. L. R. 280; Wood on Master and Servant, 222, 247, 280.

Howard v. McClane

146 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 9, 1941

Superior Ct. 37, 48 , 17 A. 2d 732 , and Metalko v. Ford Collieries Co., 146 Pa. Superior Ct. 206 , 22 A. 2d 222 ), to justify the findings of the board. … The conflict between the testimony of the daughter and that of the insurance adjuster was entirely for the board. As was said in Kelly et ux. v. Hudson Coal Company, 119 Pa.

Commonwealth v. Fell

2006 Pa. Super. 135 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 7, 2006

Alabama v. … Commonwealth v. Wimbush, 561 Pa. 368 , 750 A.2d 807 (2000).

Walters v. Topper

139 Pa. Super. 292 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 24, 1939

Teachers’ Tenure Act Cases, supra (Swick v. Board of School Directors of School District of Borough of Tarentum), p. 239. … Langan v. Pittston School District et al., 335 Pa. 395, 397 , 6 A. 2d 772 . As said in McNulty v.

Fair S.B. L. v. Pres. B. of P.

98 Pa. Super. 409 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 17, 1929

*Page 412 Dorman subsequently, in January, 1927, got the defendants, Trustees of the Presbyterian Board of Publication and Sabbath School Work, to take an assignment of the mortgage. … Thompson, who was a creditor of Conrad Brown's estate, made a written agreement with Brown's administrator by which the latter agreed, in consideration of the satisfaction of her claim against the estate, to purchase the

DiRocco Liquor License Case

167 Pa. Super. 381 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

(Emphasis added.) *386 In Calvary Presbyterian Church v. State Liquor Authority, 281 N. Y. S. 81, affirmed in 270 N. … In Smith v. Ballas, 335 Ill. App. 418 , 82 N.