Case law

DeAngelis Liquor License Case

183 Pa. Super. 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

The Clarendon V. F. W. Home Association Liquor License Case, 167 Pa. Superior Ct. 44 , 75 A. 2d 171 , is readily distinguished. … Beaver Valley Water Co. v. Pa. P. U. C., 140 Pa. Superior Ct. 297 , 14 A. 2d 205 .” 6 See West Penn Power Company v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 174 Pa.

Silvers v. Philco Corp.

175 Pa. Super. 246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 16, 1954

It was within the province of the Board to so hold. Darmopray v. Budd Mfg. Co., 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 200, 205 , 82 A. 2d 341 (1951). … However, the Referee and the Board were not bound by the testimony of the impartial medical expert. Ciello v. D. J. Kennedy Co., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 492, 495 , 200 A. 147 (1938).

Wyinskie v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

95 Pa. Super. 170 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 10, 1928

findings of fact: Allen v. … The court below, on the authority of Gairt v.

Stufflet v. Fraternal Order of Eagles

164 Pa. Super. 473 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1949

In Rovere v. Interstate Cemetery Co., 164 Pa. … And, of course, the testimony of a medical witness, even though uncontradicted, is not binding on the board. Bartman v. Jones & Laughlin, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 31 , 60 A. 2d 565 .

Metroclub Condominium Ass'n v. 201-59 North Eighth Street Associates

2012 Pa. Super. 122 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 2012

See also Helpin v. … See also, e.g., Lake v.

425-429, Inc. Liquor License Case

179 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 21, 1955

The Board, in reaching its conclusion, did not abuse its discretion. In Mielcuszny v. … It was refused by both the board and the court below on appeal.

Schaefer v. Central News Co.

179 Pa. Super. 559 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1955

. ■ ¡ Obviously, since tbe Board could have completely disregarded tbe claimant’s expert medical testimony, Stufflet v. Order of Eagles, 164 Pa. … Tbe testimony of a witness may be accepted or rejected in whole or in part by tbe Board. Kline v. Kiehl, 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 392, 396 , 43 A. 2d 616 . Palady v. Reliance Steel Products Co., 165 Pa.

McGee v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.

121 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 31, 1936

See Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Superior Ct. 298 , 163 A. 63 ; Foster v. Mellon Stuart Co. et al., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 311 , 173 A. 773 . … In the case of Morris v. Bulletin Co., 110 Pa.

Wolsko v. American Bridge Co.

158 Pa. Super. 339 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1945

The board, in support of its conclusion as to the burden of proof, relies upon Stauffer v. Susquehanna Collieries Co., 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 277 , 176 A. 740 , and Kuca v. … We are of the opinion that on the facts found by the board there remained only a question of law, and that the conclusions of the board and of the court below were erroneous. See Berlin v. Crawford, 86 Pa.

Wawa, Inc. v. Alexander J. Litwornia & Associates

2003 Pa. Super. 55 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 11, 2003

Price v. … NAACP v.

Bogavich v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.

162 Pa. Super. 388 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 13, 1947

Schrock v. Stonycreek Coal Co. et al., 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 599 , 33 A. 2d 522 ; Walsh v. Penn Anth. Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328 , 24 A. 2d 51 . … Corrento v. Ventresca, 144 Pa. Superior Ct. 358 , 19 A. 2d 746 ; Osterritter v. Moore-Flesher Co., 150 Pa. Superior Ct. 236 , 27 A. 2d 262 .

Commonwealth v. Call

249 Pa. Super. 511 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1977

Hendrickson v. State Brd. of Parole, 409 Pa. 204 , 185 A.2d 581 (1962); Commonwealth ex rel Sparks v. Russell, 403 Pa. 320 , 169 A.2d 884 (1961); Commonwealth ex rel. Soudani v. … Hendrickson v. State Board of Parole, supra 409 Pa. at 207-208 , 185 A.2d at 584 (citations omitted). In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Thompson

286 Pa. Super. 31 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 3, 1981

John Thompson and one of the other inmates possessed small packets containing a brown grassy substance. … Commonwealth v. Weakland, 267 Pa.Super. 66 , 405 A.2d 1305 (1979) (panel). Commonwealth v. Brown, 467 Pa. 512 , 359 A.2d 393 (1976). Judgment of sentence affirmed. SPAETH, J., concurred in the result. 1 .

Commonwealth v. Johnson

273 Pa. Super. 14 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1979

See Com. v. Holmes, 482 Pa. 97 , 393 A.2d 397 (1978); Com. v. Sullivan, 472 Pa. 129 , 371 A.2d 468 (1977). … And just limit the testimony of Officer Brown to being the second officer on the scene, helping to put the body on the stretcher and move it to the police wagon.” See Com. v.

Commonwealth ex rel. Swanson v. Barry

199 Pa. Super. 244 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1962

Here Judge Brown found compelling reasons for continuing the custody in the father. … Judge Brown also properly notes as an important consideration the fact that the mother’s home is beyond the jurisdiction of the court. See Commonwealth ex rel. Buell v. Buell, 186 Pa.

Blouss v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western R. R.

73 Pa. Super. 95 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1919

It was a question of fact: Gallagher v. Walton Mfg. Co., 264 Pa. 29 ; or at most a mixed question of fact and law: Flucker v. Steel Co., 263 Pa. 113 . … In Dzikowska v.

Elwyn v. DeLuca

2012 Pa. Super. 136 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2012

He cites to Dodds v. … Smay v. E.R. Stuebner, Inc., 864 A.2d 1266, 1270 (Pa.Super.2004) (citations omitted).

Chiz & Dot's, Inc. Liquor License Case

211 Pa. Super. 320 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1967

Opinion by Watkins, J., This is an appeal by the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board from the order of the County Court of Allegheny County reversing the order of the Board suspending the license issued to Chiz & Dot’s, Inc … Kuca v. Lehigh Valley Coal Co., 268 Pa. 163, 166 , 110 A. 731 (1920); Pa. P. & L. Co. v. Public Service Commission, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 195, 200 , 193 A. 427 (1937).

Seidl's Appeal

143 Pa. Super. 539 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1940

See, inter alia, United States v. Chambers, 291 U. S. 217, 223-225 ; Phila. v. Bartell, 139 Pa. Superior Ct. 319, 322 , 11 A. 2d 563 ; Com. v. Beattie, 93 Pa. Superior Ct. 404, 412 . … Maple, 70 Pa. 221, 223 ; Hughes v. Kline, 30 Pa. 227, 230, 231 ; Moore v.

Darrow Estate

164 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 10, 1948

See, also, Brown v. Ancient Order of United Workmen, 208 Pa. 101 , 57 A. 176 . As to the identity of a beneficiary or the object of a legacy, the will speaks as of its date. Anshutz v. … W. 719 ; Brown’s Estate, 139 Iowa 219 , 117 N. W. 260 ; Card v. Alexander, 48 Conn. 492 ; Annotations, 25 A. L. R. 49, 55, 37 A. L. R. 312, 42 A. L. R. 1289.