Case law

Del Rossi v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

210 Pa. Super. 485 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1967

The board decided that claimant had failed to prove that decedent was in the course of his employment. The court below reversed the board and sent the case back to the board for further consideration. … Ewing v. Alan Wood Steel Co., 138 Pa.

Cassell Unemployment Compensation Case

167 Pa. Super. 440 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

V, §510, 43 PS §830. … Dept. v. Unemp. Comp. Board, 133 Pa.

Desiderio v. Penn Fruit Co., Inc.

207 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1966

On appeal from an order of the Board terminating compensation benefits, the question before the court is whether there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the Board: Erwin v. L. & H. … This Board finds the claimant no longer,disabled either partially or totally”. We perceive no merit in appellant’s request that the case be remanded to the Board. The order of-the court below is affirmed. 1 Fehr v.

Morgan v. Sanderson

146 Pa. Super. 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1941

He is the agent of the board and his findings and conclusions, if appealed from, may be rejected, changed or adopted by the Board. Focht v. Gen. Baking Co., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, 323 , 9 A. (2nd) 185. … In addition, the objection was not specifically raised on the appeal from the referee to the board. See Nesbit v. Vandervort & Curry, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 58, 64 , 193 A. 393 .

Commonwealth v. Feucht

2008 Pa. Super. 176 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 4, 2008

Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Spennato

318 Pa. Super. 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1983

Commonwealth v. Anderson, 265 Pa.Super. 494 , 402 A.2d 546 (1979); Commonwealth v. Eddington, 255 Pa.Super. 25 , 386 A.2d 117 (1978); Commonwealth v. Luther, 266 Pa.Super. 240 , 403 A.2d 1329 (1979). … See also Commonwealth v. Bidner, 282 Pa.Super. 100 , 422 A.2d 847 (1980); Commonwealth v. Lafferty, 276 Pa.Super. 400 , 419 A.2d 518 (1980); Commonwealth v. Yanni, 208 Pa.Super. 191 , 222 A.2d 617 (1966).

Commonwealth v. Wasson

42 Pa. Super. 38 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 3, 1910

In Hazen v. … In Commonwealth v.

Commonwealth v. Lyons

142 Pa. Super. 54 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1940

Specific acts of misconduct are unquestionably inadmissible in criminal actions to prove a bad general reputation: Commonwealth v. Jones, 280 Pa. 368 , 124 A. 486 ; Commonwealth v. Stewart, 110 Pa. … Superior Ct. 279 , 168 A. 528 ; Commonwealth v. San Juan et al., 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 179 , 195 A. 433 .

Obzut v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

199 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 13, 1962

Goodman v. University Shop, Inc., 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 129, 131 , 169 A. 2d 316 (1961). Even uncontradicted testimony need not be accepted as true. Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Mfg. Co., 194 Pa. … Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 333 , 24 A. 2d 51 (1942); Chuplis v. Steve Shalamanda Coal Co., 192 Pa. Superior Ct. 76, 80 , 159 A. 2d 520 (1960). .

Giana v. Byllesby Engineering & Management Co.

122 Pa. Super. 156 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 23, 1936

An appeal was taken to the Board on August 16, 1930, and on November 22, 1930 the referee’s order disallowing compensation was affirmed by the Board. *158 On January 17, 1931, less than two months after the Board’s action … He did all that the Act required him to do, and the Board can do now what it might have done then. See Shetina v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., 114 Pa. Superior Ct. 108, 111 , 173 A. 727 ; Horton v.

Stewart v. Commonwealth

198 Pa. Super. 261 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1962

See also: Cohen v. Doubleday & Co., Inc., 191 Pa. Superior Ct. 106 , 155 A. 2d 378 (1959) ; Woods v. Murraysville Telephone Co., 197 Pa. Superior Ct. 636 , 180 A. 2d 118 (1962); Morgan v. … Tbe referee is only tbe agent of tbe board and the board is tbe ultimate arbiter of tbe facts in workmen’s compensation cases. Downing v. Leechburg Min. Co., 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 574 , 171 A. 2d 857 (1961).

Seitz Liquor License Case

157 Pa. Super. 553 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1945

O’Donnell v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control *556 Board, 351 Pa. 129 , 40 A. 2d 392 . … State Board of Undertakers v. Sekula, 339 Pa. 309 , 14 A. 2d 308 ; Easton Transit Company’s Petition, 270 Pa. 136 , 112 A. 917 ; Richardson’s Appeal, 30 Pa. 510 . Appeal dismissed.

Billick v. Republic Steel Corp.

214 Pa. Super. 267 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 12, 1969

The order of the court below is reversed, and the order of the Board is reinstated. 1 Manikowski v. Morris Run Coal Mining Co., 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 118 , 60 A. 2d 344 ; Lemmon v. Penna. Dept. of Highways, 164 Pa. … Superior Ct. 254 , 63 A. 2d 684 ; Nelson v. Borough of Greenville, 181 Pa. Superior Ct. 488 , 124 A. 2d 675 ; Morgan v. Michael Baker, Jr., Inc., 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 521 , 205 A. 2d 668 ; Gaughan v.

Sayers, W. v. Heritage Valley Medical Group, Inc.

2021 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2021

Judson, a case involving a statute of frauds defense, stating that our Supreme Court’s holding in Brown v. … Brown, 213 A.2d at 346.

Commonwealth v. Cosgrove

427 Pa. Super. 553 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 11, 1993

He also relies upon the case Commonwealth v. Brown, 503 Pa. 514 , 469 A.2d 1371 (1983), inter alia, as a basis for precluding trial on the criminal charges. … The hearing was held and Brown’s probation was revoked.

Yanik v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

150 Pa. Super. 148 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 28, 1942

Johnson v. Purnell et al., 131 Pa. Superior Ct. 230, 235 , 200 A. 151 . See, also, Kitchen v. Miller Bros. Co. et al., 115 Pa. Superior Ct. 141, 145, 146, 147 , 174 A. 919 ; Tinsman v. … See Clark v. Clearfield Opera House Co. et al., supra; Toth v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp., supra; Cole v. Stewart et al., supra.

In Re Estate of Liscio

432 Pa. Super. 440 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 17, 1994

v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (striking down racial discrimination in public education); Roe v.

McGee v. Y. O. Coal Co.

121 Pa. Super. 85 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 8, 1935

See Roeschen v. Dietrich et al., 107 Pa. Super. 298 , 163 A. 63 ; Foster v. Mellon Stuart Co. et al., 114 Pa. Super. 311 , 173 A. 773 . … In the case of Morris v. Bulletin Co., 110 Pa.

Mohler v. COOK

205 Pa. Super. 232 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1965

Where the Board has found against the party having the burden of proof, the question on appeal is whether there has been a capricious disregard of competent evidence: Verna v. Stabler, 204 Pa. … The Referee is only the agent of the Board and the lower court does not have power to set aside the Board’s findings and reinstate prior findings by the Referee: Krasznay v. Milton Ross Metals, 204 Pa.

Kohlman, D. v. Grane Healthcare Company

228 A.3d 920 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 2020

Marmet [Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, 565 U.S. 530, 531 (2012) (per curiam)]. … Brown et al v. Marmet Health Care Ctr. et al, 229 W. Va. 382, 729 S.E.2d 217, 223 (W.Va. 2012) [(hereinafter, Brown II)].