Case law

Fronko v. United States Sanitary Manufacturing Co.

155 Pa. Super. 636 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1944

Superior Ct. 193 . 20 A. 2d 874 ; Walsh v. Penn Anthracite Mining Co., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 328, 333, 334 , 24 A. 2d 51 ; Anderson v. Baxter, 285 Pa. 443, 447, 448 , 132 A. 358 ; Stauffer v. Hubley Mfg. Co., 151 Pa. … The findings of the board supported by substantial competent evidence are conclusive on the court: Ferrante v. Ferrante et al., 123 Pa. Superior Ct. 74 , 186 A. 426 ; Hammill v. Matthew Cummings Co. et al., 149 Pa.

Icenhour v. Freedom Oil Works Co.

145 Pa. Super. 168 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 21, 1941

In Garrahan v. Glen Alden Coal Co., 135 Pa. … Sandy v. Hazle Brook Coal Co., 138 Pa. Superior Ct. 581, 583 , 10 A. 2d 833 . The board could accept part of claimant’s oral testimony and reject the balance. Zbirowski v. John T. Lewis & Bros. Co., 130 Pa.

Miller v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

138 Pa. Super. 8 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 13, 1939

Opinion by Parker, J., We agree with the referee, the board, and the court below that the claimant’s decedent was engaged in interstate transportation at the time he was killed and that the federal Employers’ Liability Act … (Brown v. Lehigh V. R. R. Co., 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 380 , 184 A. 290 ; Mahon v. L. & W. Val. R. R. Co., 131 Pa.

Urbano v. Meneses

288 Pa. Super. 103 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 19, 1981

Feingold v. … See Gibson v.

McErlean v. McCartan

280 Pa. Super. 531 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 19, 1980

Sullivan v. Wolson, 262 Pa. *534 Super. 397 , 396 A.2d 1230 (1978); Brown v. Schriver, 254 Pa.Super. 468 , 386 A.2d 45 (1978). … In Sullivan , a panel of this court cited Brown in holding the doctrine inapplicable to an icy highway.

Seitz Liquor License Case

157 Pa. Super. 553 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1945

O’Donnell v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control *556 Board, 351 Pa. 129 , 40 A. 2d 392 . … State Board of Undertakers v. Sekula, 339 Pa. 309 , 14 A. 2d 308 ; Easton Transit Company’s Petition, 270 Pa. 136 , 112 A. 917 ; Richardson’s Appeal, 30 Pa. 510 . Appeal dismissed.

Sayers, W. v. Heritage Valley Medical Group, Inc.

2021 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 15, 2021

Judson, a case involving a statute of frauds defense, stating that our Supreme Court’s holding in Brown v. … Brown, 213 A.2d at 346.

Commonwealth v. Spennato

318 Pa. Super. 532 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 9, 1983

Commonwealth v. Anderson, 265 Pa.Super. 494 , 402 A.2d 546 (1979); Commonwealth v. Eddington, 255 Pa.Super. 25 , 386 A.2d 117 (1978); Commonwealth v. Luther, 266 Pa.Super. 240 , 403 A.2d 1329 (1979). … See also Commonwealth v. Bidner, 282 Pa.Super. 100 , 422 A.2d 847 (1980); Commonwealth v. Lafferty, 276 Pa.Super. 400 , 419 A.2d 518 (1980); Commonwealth v. Yanni, 208 Pa.Super. 191 , 222 A.2d 617 (1966).

Greeby v. Phila. Asbestos Co. (Et Al.)

120 Pa. Super. 9 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 22, 1935

In harmony with this liberal tendency, the courts have held that the board has broad powers to grant a rehearing when justice requires: Kocher v. Kocher et al., 300 Pa. 206 , 150 A. 468 ; Manley v. … Superior Ct. 173 ; Fedak v. Dzialdowski, 101 Pa. Superior Ct. 346 . In Vorbnoff v.

Chilcote v. Leidy

207 Pa. Super. 345 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1966

Webster v. Grove City College, supra, at page 479. The Workmen’s Compensation Board is not required to accept even uncontradicted testimony as true. Peron v. Phoenix Park Coal Co., 202 Pa. … Tokash v. Early Foundry Co., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 467, 469 , 43 A. 2d 553 (1945). The board is, of course, the ultimate trier of facts. The appellant makes much of the report of Dr.

Diaz v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp.

170 Pa. Super. 608 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 26, 1952

Diaz v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 155 Pa. … Court in Diaz v.

Morgan v. Sanderson

146 Pa. Super. 37 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1941

He is the agent of the board and his findings and conclusions, if appealed from, may be rejected, changed or adopted by the Board. Focht v. Gen. Baking Co., 137 Pa. Superior Ct. 318, 323 , 9 A. (2nd) 185. … In addition, the objection was not specifically raised on the appeal from the referee to the board. See Nesbit v. Vandervort & Curry, 128 Pa. Superior Ct. 58, 64 , 193 A. 393 .

Hawkins' Petition

129 Pa. Super. 453 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1937

We have recently pointed out in Potts v. Penn Township School District, 127 Pa. Superior Ct. 173 , 193 A. 290 , and Ickes v. Costlow et al., 127 Pa. … In Potts v.

Desiderio v. Penn Fruit Co., Inc.

207 Pa. Super. 468 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1966

On appeal from an order of the Board terminating compensation benefits, the question before the court is whether there was sufficient competent evidence to support the findings of the Board: Erwin v. L. & H. … This Board finds the claimant no longer,disabled either partially or totally”. We perceive no merit in appellant’s request that the case be remanded to the Board. The order of-the court below is affirmed. 1 Fehr v.

Kracoski v. Bernice White Ash Coal Co.

183 Pa. Super. 155 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 20, 1957

While the board is the ultimate arbiter of the facts and its findings are binding on appeal if supported by competent evidence (Greap v. Oberdorff, 178 Pa. Superior Ct. 153, 157 , 113 A. 2d 339 ; Messikomer v. … It is not always necessary that additional testimony be taken before the board (77 PS §856), but an opportunity to be heard on the issues is required. See Unora v.

Hosterman v. Best

158 Pa. Super. 617 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1945

Hurtuk v. H. C. Frick Coke Co., 157 Pa. Superior Ct. 317, 321 , 43 A. 2d 559 . … See Fitzgerald v. Atlas Asbestos Co. et al., 158 Pa. Superior Ct. 151, 153 , 44 A. 2d 316 . The board did not accept the theory of the claimant, and the findings of fact were made accordingly.

Green Unemployment Compensation Case

174 Pa. Super. 286 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 29, 1953

Superior Ct. 421 , 65 A. 2d 436 ; Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A. 2d 336 ; and Sun Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. v. … Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 163 Pa. Superior Ct. 66 , 60 A. 2d 352 ; Tronieri v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 435 , 65 A. 2d 426 .

Parnell v. Taylor

266 Pa. Super. 74 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1979

Douglas Brown witnessed the accident. … In Nebel v.

Sames v. Borough of Perkasie

100 Pa. Super. 402 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 18, 1930

Hiltner et al., 290 Pa. 225 ; Persing v. Traction Co., 294 Pa. 230 ; Sgattone v. Mulholland et al., 290 Pa. 341 ) of the Quakertown authorities. … Therefor, inaccordance with the power vested in the board by the amendatory Act of 1919, Vorbnoff v.

Commonwealth v. Ziegler Dairy Co.

139 Pa. Super. 224 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 26, 1939

Railroad Co. v. … Bank v. Board of County Commrs., 264 U. S. 450, 455, 456 ; Anniston Mfg. Co. v. Davis, 301 U. S. 337, 343 ; Rohrer v. Milk Control Board, 322 Pa. 257, 280 , 186 A. 336 ; Com. ex rel. Margiotti v. Ortwein, 132 Pa.