Case law

Commonwealth v. Green

405 Pa. Super. 24 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 1991

Compare Commonwealth v. Brown, 240 Pa.Super. 190 , 361 A.2d 846 (1976), with Commonwealth v. Edwards, 400 Pa.Super. 197 , 583 A.2d 445 (1990). … See Griffin, supra; Commonwealth v. Miller, 303 Pa.Super. 504 , 450 A.2d 40 (1982); Brown, supra.

Moore v. Roth

231 Pa. Super. 464 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 11, 1974

Williams v. Board of Probation and Parole, 2 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 312, 315 (1971); Commonwealth v. Vladyka, supra, at 394. … Bogish v. Tees, 211 F.2d 69 ; United States ex rel. Wing v. Commonwealth, 90 F. Supp. 208 .

Yeager v. United Natural Gas Co.

197 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1961

McClinton, 3 P. & W. 67 (1831); Commonwealth v. Schooley, 5 Kulp 53 (1888); Rossey v. Mayburg Chemical Company, 58 Pa. D. & C. 532 (1946). … Smith v. Jones, 369 Pa. 13, 14 , 85 A. 2d 23 (1951); Armour Leather Co. v. Alexander, 276 Pa. 515 , 120 A. 672 (1923); Commonwealth v. Mackley, 380 Pa. 70, 75 , 110 A. 2d 172 (1955).

McCafferty v. Masten Transportation, Inc.

205 Pa. Super. 239 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1965

Superior Ct. 319 , 162 A. 2d 42 , the determination of those facts was for the Board. The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the employer: Lind v. Argo Lamp Co., 198 Pa. … The pivotal issues of fact were determined by the Board adversely to the claimant. We are all of the opinion that, in so doing, the Board did not capriciously disregard competent evidence. In Kirker v. W. M.

Shemanchick v. M. & S. Coal Co.

167 Pa. Super. 350 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 20, 1950

Such additional testimony need not be taken by the board itself or any member thereof.- The referee *354 is the agent of the board and his findings are not made directly to the board but are filed with the bureau, and if … unappealed from are the action of the board: Conley v.

Porto v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.

124 Pa. Super. 431 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1936

We are satisfied, moreover, that the order was within the discretionary power of the board.” In Barton v. Pittsburgh Goal Co., 113 Pa. … Vitkovic v. Pennsylvania Clay Co., 278 Pa. 474 [ 123 A. 469 ]; Garvin v. Diamond Coal and *437 Coke Co., 278 Pa. 469 [ 123 A. 468 ]; Kopecky v. Coalmont Coal Co., 278 Pa. 478 [ 123 A. 471 ].” In Giana v.

Barrett v. First Mechanics National Bank

133 Pa. Super. 366 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1938

Badger, Executor of Charlotte Thompson Ames Brown, deceased, under which the sheriff attached the real estate of the decedent, who had been a resident of Massachusetts. … See also Reynolds v.

Commonwealth v. Pascoe

39 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1909

The case, we think, resembles that of Clark v. … Brown and evidently intended to bring him into disrepute in the community.

Dixon v. Shapiro

203 Pa. Super. 535 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1964

It is well settled that the board is the ultimate fact finding body and that it may reject, change or adopt the findings of the referee. Erwin v. L. & H. Construction Co., 192 Pa. … Shull v. Sears, Roebuck and Company, 195 Pa. Superior Ct. 342 , 171 A. 2d 605 (1961). As we said in Shull v.

Commonwealth v. Ragan

439 Pa. Super. 337 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 1995

Thompson v. City of Philadelphia, 507 Pa. 592, 598 , 493 A.2d 669, 672 (1985) (citing Burrell v. Philadelphia Electric Co., 438 Pa. 286 , 265 A.2d 516 (1970)). … In the recent case of Commonwealth v. Brown, our Supreme Court discussed the standard of appellate review for weight of the evidence challenges. 538 Pa. 410, 435 , 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994).

Com. v. Carey, R.

249 A.3d 1217 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 19, 2021

Commonwealth v. Means, 614 A.2d 220, 223 (Pa. 1992); see also Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 26 A.3d 485, 493 (Pa. Super. 2011) (citation omitted).

Leonardziak Liquor License Case

210 Pa. Super. 511 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1967

Under Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), evidence obtained by illegal search and seizure is inadmissible in state courts. In One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. … Elkins v. United States, 364 U.S. 206, 217 (1960).

Weinstein Liquor License Case

159 Pa. Super. 437 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 12, 1946

Marchines v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 148 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 , 24 A. 2d 691 ; Gima v. The Hudson Coal Co., 106 Pa. … The state may confer discretionary powers upon an administrative board (Commonwealth v. Funk, supra), and uniformly the federal Supreme Court has upheld this power. Davis v. Mass., 167 U. S. 43 ; Wilson v.

Hoosca v. Lytle Coal Company

129 Pa. Super. 434 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1937

That being the case the law makes the findings of fact of the board final and conclusive: Act of June 26, 1919, P. L. 642, amending sections 418 and 423 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act; Vonot v. … Hudson Coal Co., 285 Pa. 385, 390 , 132 A. 347 ; Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co., 286 Pa. 199, 205 , 133 A. 256 ; Kucinic v. United E. & F. Co., 110 Pa. Superior Ct. 261, 264 , 168 A. 344 .

Commonwealth v. Morgan

265 Pa. Super. 225 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1979

See Commonwealth v. Madison, supra; Commonwealth v. Brown, 226 Pa.Super. 172 , 313 A.2d 290 (1973) (SPAETH, J., dissenting). … Wells v. Pittsburgh Board of Education, supra; Schlesinger Appeal, 404 Pa. 584 , 172 A.2d 835 (1961).

Kochinsky v. Independent Pier Co.

157 Pa. Super. 15 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1944

In Ciello v. D. J. Kennedy Co. et al., 131 Pa. … In Wallace v. Allen, 115 Pa.

MacKalica v. MacKalica

716 A.2d 653 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 13, 1998

At the equitable distribution hearing, wife acknowledged that the property was acquired during the marriage (N.T. at 42). [4] Thereafter, the master cited Brown v. … In Litmans v.

Unora v. Glen Alden Coal Co.

171 Pa. Super. 29 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1952

Plaugher v. *33 American Viscose Corp., 147 Pa. Superior Ct. 372 , 24 A. 2d 698 . … In general on appeal from the decision of a Referee the allowance of further hearing before the Workmen’s Compensation Board is within the discretion of that Board. Cf. Vonot v.

Zupicick v. P. & R. C. & I. Co.

108 Pa. Super. 165 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1932

We so construed it in Manley v. Lycoming Motors Corp., 83 Pa. Superior Ct. 173 , where we said: “And in Chase v. Emery Mfg. … The ease of Hudyck v.

Club Oasis, Inc. Liquor License Case

200 Pa. Super. 439 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 19, 1963

In Commonwealth v. … Superior Ct. 512 , 58 A. 2d 194 . 4 Commonwealth v. Moogerman, 385 Pa. 256 , 122 A. 2d 804 ; Commonwealth v. Funk, 323 Pa. 390 , 186 A. 65 . See also Commonwealth v.