Case law

Spankard's Liquor License Case

138 Pa. Super. 251 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 23, 1939

It is only a privilege: Grime v. Dept. of Public Instruction, supra, pp. 381, 384; Harris v. … Superior Ct. 311, 334 , 187 A. 461 , affirmed 326 Pa. 120 , 191 A. 590 ; Com. v. Stofchek, 322 Pa. 513 , 185 A. 840 . A state may adopt a lesser degree of regulation than total prohibition : State Board v.

Commonwealth v. McElroy

70 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1918

Under the express provisions of the second section of that statute it would not have been necessary for the Commonwealth to aver or prove that the defendant had cohabited with Elizabeth Brown, as man and wife. … If it had done so it would have certainly been *320 sufficient to support an indictment for adultery, as well one charging bigamy: Commonwealth v. Morton, 12 Philadelphia 595; Commonwealth v. Montross, 8 Pa.

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Ricapito v. Bethlehem School District

148 Pa. Super. 426 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1941

Streibert v. … Superior Ct. 567 ; Parnell v. Clymer Borough School Dist., supra; Teachers’ Tenure Act Cases, 329 Pa. 213 , (Swick v. Board of School Directors, Boro of Tarentum, p. 239), 197 A. 344, 358 .

Lowery v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.

210 Pa. Super. 75 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1967

His death was called to the Board’s attention by letter, but the widow did not file a separate fatal claim petition. See Moore v. Dodge Steel Co., 206 Pa. Superior *77 Ct. 242, 213 A. 2d 130 . … It is our view that the Board was fully warranted in finding that claimant had not sustained the required burden of proof. The decision of the Board in the case at bar is supported by our recent decisions in Obzut v.

Junge's Appeal. (No. 1.)

89 Pa. Super. 543 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 15, 1925

The statute does not give the Board power to do whatever they feel inclined to, regardless of the provisions of the statute: People ex rel. Cotton v. Leo, 180 N. T. Supp. 554. … Werner v. Walsh, 209 N. Y. Supp. 454 .

Quemahoning Coal Co. v. Township of Jenner

83 Pa. Super. 577 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 17, 1924

L. 37, any owner of taxable property may appeal from the decision of the board of revision to the common pleas. It was pointed out by Mr. Justice Mestrezat, in Frick Coke Co. v. Mt. … Our Supreme Court so held in Shenango Furnace Co. v. Fairfield Township, 229 Fa. 357.

Newancavitch v. Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp.

131 Pa. Super. 391 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1938

We held in Diana v. Byllesby Engineering & Management Co ., 122 Pa. Superior Ct. 156 , 185 A. 866 , that an appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order of the Board granting a rehearing. … Superior Ct. 560, 563, 564 , 165 A. 506 ; Dolan v. Com., 106 Pa. Superior Ct. 74, 77 , 161 A. 763 ; Greeby v. Phila. Asbestos Co., 120 Pa. Superior Ct. 9, 11, 12 , 181 A. 452 ; Giana v.

Commonwealth v. Carroll

131 Pa. Super. 357 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 2, 1938

‘Whatever tends to show the interest or feeling of a witness in a cause is competent by way of cross-examination:” Com. v. Farrell, 187 Pa. 408, 423, 41 A. 382 ; Com. v. Emmett, 74 Pa. Superior Ct. 86, 90 ; Com. v. … Superior Ct. 66, 71 ; Ott v. Houghton, 30 Pa. 451 ; Lenahan v. Pittston Coal Co., 221 Pa. 626, 629 , 70 A. 884 ; Hopkinson v. Leeds, 78 Pa. 396, 400 .

Commonwealth v. Durham

2010 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 2010

Commonwealth v. Howard, 552 Pa. 27, 713 A.2d 89 (1998); Commonwealth v. 2001 Toyota Camry, 894 A.2d 207 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006). Ebersole, 986 A.2d at 881 (adopting verbatim the reasoning of Singleton v. … .; see also Commonwealth v.

Brangs v. Brangs

407 Pa. Super. 43 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 23, 1991

Brown v. Hall, 495 Pa. 635 , 435 A.2d 859 (1981); Millstein v. Millstein, 311 Pa.Super. 495 , 457 A.2d 1291 (1983); Madnick v. Madnick, 339 Pa.Super. 130 , 488 A.2d 344 (1985); Trumpp v. … Richman Sons, Inc. v. Com., Board of Finance and Revenue, supra.

Whitford Liquor License Case

166 Pa. Super. 48 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 21, 1949

See State v. Superior Court, 31 Wn. 32 , *Page 52 71 P. 601 ; Bolsta v. Bremer, 212 Minn. 269 , 3 N.W.2d 430 . … Benner v. Tacony Athletic Assn., 328 Pa. 577 , 196 A. 390 . And finally, the Commonwealth is not estopped by acts of its agents which exceed their powers or violate the law. Breinig v.

Franke Unemployment Compensation Case

166 Pa. Super. 251 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 16, 1949

Womelsdorf Consolidated Water Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 160 Pa. Superior Ct. 298, 304 , 50 A. 2d 548 ; Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 164 Pa. … Superior Ct. 66, 67 , 60 A. 2d 352 ), referees are, in effect, merely representatives or agents of the board, which is the ultimate fact-finding body (Bronkowski v. Colonial Colliery Co., 153 Pa.

Davidson Unemployment Compensation Case

186 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1958

`The law now is that the board, when an appeal has been taken to it, may disregard the findings of fact of the referee and may make or substitute its own findings, without taking additional testimony.' Bronkowski v. … Superior Ct. 574, 576 , 34 A. 2d 837 ; Kenny v. Esslinger's Brewery, 161 Pa.Super. 451 , 55 A. 2d 554 ."

Commonwealth v. Taylor

257 Pa. Super. 298 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1978

Accordingly, Brown held that the Supreme Court’s refusal to undertake sua sponte review in cases involving trials conducted before this amendment, see Commonwealth v. … Moreover, in Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, our Court unanimously agreed to ascertain whether the lower court had complied with Rule 1123(c), despite Brown’s failure to raise this issue for our consideration.

Downing v. Leechburg Mining Co.

195 Pa. Super. 574 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

“We have also repeatedly held that the referee is only the agent or representative of the Board and that the Board may disregard his findings and establish its own.” Anetakis v. Salvation Army, 191 Pa. … Gasior v. Pittsburgh, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 371 , 146 A. 2d 320 (1958).

McCandless v. Summit Township School District

55 Pa. Super. 277 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1913

Padden, 89 Pa. 395 ; Dyberry School District v. Mercer, 115 Pa. 559 ; Whitehead v. School District, 145 Pa. 418 ; McCrea v. School District, 145 Pa. 550 ; Strathern v. Gilmore, 184 Pa. 265 ; Com. v. Risser, 3 Pa. … Morgan, 70 Pa. 229 ; Genesee Twp. v. McDonald, 98 Pa. 444 ; Burke v. School District, 28 Pa. Superior Ct. 16 .

Erwin v. L. & H. CONSTRUCTION CO.

192 Pa. Super. 632 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1960

The board is the final arbiter of facts, the referee is only an agent of the board and the board may reject, change or adopt the findings of the referee. Rodgers v. Methodist Episcopal Hosp., 188 Pa. … Kubler v. Yeager, 189 Pa. Superior Ct. 339 , 150 A. 2d 383 (1959). In Dindino v. Weekly Review Pub. Co., Inc., 188 Pa.

Reiter Liquor License Case

173 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

Com. v. Perri, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 78 ; Com. v. Klein, 42 Pa. Superior Ct. 66 ; Nestor v. George, 354 Pa. 19 , 46 A. 2d 469 . … In Heller v.

Com. v. Carlson, M.

2020 Pa. Super. 290 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 21, 2020

-7- J-S43020-20 Commonwealth v. Brown, 476 A.2d 381, 384 (Pa. Super. 1984) (citations omitted). … Def.’s Office v.

Commonwealth v. GROSSO

192 Pa. Super. 513 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1960

In Com. v. Russo, 177 Pa. … In Com. v.