Case law

Commonwealth v. Lynn

83 A.3d 434 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 26, 2013

Brown, 721 A.2d at 1107 . … ’s friend, and who resided with Brown in his residence.

Commonwealth v. Weigle

2008 Pa. Super. 69 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 2008

Commonwealth v. Brown, 423 Pa.Super. 264 , 620 A.2d 1213, 1214 (Pa.Super.1993) (quoting Commonwealth v. Niemetz, 282 Pa.Super. 431 , 422 A.2d 1369, 1373 (Pa.Super.1980)). … Tanner v.

Eason v. U.S. Emer. Fleet Corp.

89 Pa. Super. 485 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 14, 1924

accordance with our rules, and find that in a jury trial plaintiff had a verdict for $69.44; that subsequently, on appropriate motion, the court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $416.66, pursuant to Moffitt v. … Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa. Super. 81 , and Max v. U.S. Shipping Board E.F. Corp., 80 Pa.

Downing v. Leechburg Mining Co.

195 Pa. Super. 574 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 15, 1961

“We have also repeatedly held that the referee is only the agent or representative of the Board and that the Board may disregard his findings and establish its own.” Anetakis v. Salvation Army, 191 Pa. … Gasior v. Pittsburgh, 188 Pa. Superior Ct. 371 , 146 A. 2d 320 (1958).

Reiter Liquor License Case

173 Pa. Super. 552 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

Com. v. Perri, 97 Pa. Superior Ct. 78 ; Com. v. Klein, 42 Pa. Superior Ct. 66 ; Nestor v. George, 354 Pa. 19 , 46 A. 2d 469 . … In Heller v.

Carey v. Philadelphia Ship Supply & Lumber Co.

209 Pa. Super. 306 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 23, 1967

The Board is the final arbiter of the facts, and the evidence must be, viewed in the light most favorable to the party having the Board’s decision : Everitt v. Baker Refrigerator Co., 197 Pa. … Where, as in the instant case, the Board properly concludes that claimant was engaged in the performance of his customary work, the finding of the Board is binding on the reviewing court: Mohler v. Cook, 205 Pa.

Whitford Liquor License Case

166 Pa. Super. 48 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 12, 1950

See State v. Superior Court, 31 Wash. 32 , *52 71 P. 601 ; Bolsta v. Bremer, 212 Minn. 269 , 3 N. W. 2d 430 . … The board was not guilty of laches; it acted promptly upon discovering its mistake. Benner v. Tacony Athletic Assn., 328 Pa. 577 , 196 A. 390 .

Commonwealth v. Staten

2008 Pa. Super. 118 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 2, 2008

Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Hawbaker, J. v. Nottingham Village

2025 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 2, 2025

Next, the Supreme Court expressly adopted Brown, supra. In Wingate v. … See id., (citing Boorman v. Brown, 3 Q.B. (Ad. & E. N. S.) 511 (Exch. C. 1842), affirmed sub nom. Brown v. Boorman, 8 Eng. Rep. 1003 (H.L. 1844)).

Yeager v. United Natural Gas Co.

197 Pa. Super. 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1961

McClinton, 3 P. & W. 67 (1831); Commonwealth v. Schooley, 5 Kulp 53 (1888); Rossey v. Mayburg Chemical Company, 58 Pa. D. & C. 532 (1946). … Smith v. Jones, 369 Pa. 13, 14 , 85 A. 2d 23 (1951); Armour Leather Co. v. Alexander, 276 Pa. 515 , 120 A. 672 (1923); Commonwealth v. Mackley, 380 Pa. 70, 75 , 110 A. 2d 172 (1955).

Weinstein & Murman's Liquor License Case

145 Pa. Super. 476 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 7, 1941

In Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. James Hall, 91 Pa. … See also Koontz v. Messer, 314 Pa. 434 .” Welser v. Ealer, 317 Pa. 182, 184 , 176 A. 429 .

Commonwealth v. Boyd

250 Pa. Super. 487 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 6, 1977

Reliance was placed upon Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v. Lipscomb, 455 Pa. 525 , 317 A.2d 205 (1974). Secondly in regard to the assignment of error to the prosecutor’s closing argument, appellant addresses references to a Lee Brown.

Di Mezzes v. Yellow Cab Co.

193 Pa. Super. 103 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 16, 1960

Railroad Co., 396 Pa. 190 , 152 A. 2d 251 ; Brown v. Shirks Motor Express, 393 Pa. 367 , 143 A. 2d 374 ; Farmers’ Northern Market Co. v. Gallagher, 392 Pa. 221 , 139 A. 2d 908 ; Beatty v. … In O’Malley v. Quaker City Cabs, Inc., 107 Pa.

Pittsburgh School District v. E. S. S. Land Co.

140 Pa. Super. 590 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 1, 1940

The only difference between Philadelphia v. … The action by the board of assessors does not help the appellee as to past years because that board did not have the power to make this change in assessment retroactive. In Coal & Iron Co. v.

Anchel v. Shea

2000 Pa. Super. 289 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 2000

Maritrans GP, Inc. v. … (quoting Zebra v.

Paulin v. Williams Co., Inc.

122 Pa. Super. 462 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 15, 1936

The same may be said of the board’s twelfth finding of fact. Stahl v. Watson Coal Co., supra, 268 Pa. 452, 454 , 112 A. 14, 15 . … Callihan v. Montgomery, 272 Pa. 56, 62 , 115 A. 889, 891 ; Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co., 262 Pa. 1 , 104 A. 801 .

Bussone v. Sinclair Refining Co.

210 Pa. Super. 442 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 14, 1967

Reliance was placed upon Hunter v. St. Mary's Natural Gas Co., 122 Pa. … On the contrary, the order below was a clear mandate to the Board to determine the issue of causation in accordance with the Hunter decision. Such an order is legally erroneous, and is appealable: Messikomer v.

Commonwealth v. Taylor

257 Pa. Super. 298 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1978

Accordingly, Brown held that the Supreme Court’s refusal to undertake sua sponte review in cases involving trials conducted before this amendment, see Commonwealth v. … Moreover, in Commonwealth v. Brown, supra, our Court unanimously agreed to ascertain whether the lower court had complied with Rule 1123(c), despite Brown’s failure to raise this issue for our consideration.

Commonwealth v. McElroy

70 Pa. Super. 318 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 12, 1918

Under the express provisions of the second section of that statute it would not have been necessary for the Commonwealth to aver or prove that the defendant had cohabited with Elizabeth Brown, as man and wife. … If it had done so it would have certainly been *320 sufficient to support an indictment for adultery, as well one charging bigamy: Commonwealth v. Morton, 12 Philadelphia 595; Commonwealth v. Montross, 8 Pa.

Lowery v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.

210 Pa. Super. 75 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 16, 1967

His death was called to the Board’s attention by letter, but the widow did not file a separate fatal claim petition. See Moore v. Dodge Steel Co., 206 Pa. Superior *77 Ct. 242, 213 A. 2d 130 . … It is our view that the Board was fully warranted in finding that claimant had not sustained the required burden of proof. The decision of the Board in the case at bar is supported by our recent decisions in Obzut v.