Case law

F-M Realty Co. v. Brown, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 7, 2019

Stevenson v. Silverman, 417 Pa. 187, 208 A.2d 786, 788 (1965). BuyFigure.com, Inc. v. Autotrader.com, Inc., 76 A.3d 554, 561 (Pa. Super. 2013). … Newell Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Bauer, 597 A.2d 667, 669–70 (Pa. Super. 1991).

Blucas, M. v. Agiovlasitis, P.

179 A.3d 520 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 2018

Ross, Inc. v. … In compulsory arbitration, the board of arbitrators conducts the hearing as a judge would conduct a trial without a jury, ruling on legal as well as factual matters. Conner v.

Drum v. Shaull Equipment and Supply Co.

2001 Pa. Super. 349 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 2001

See Collins v. … See Lorah v.

Mensah, R. v. National Board of Medical Exam.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 2021

In Commonwealth v. … She also cites Langston v.

Commonwealth v. Lindie

147 Pa. Super. 335 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 29, 1941

On or about January 24, 1941, around eleven o’clock at night, one Ruth Ebersole heard noises which sounded like “tearing boards off”. … Brown, 71 Superior Ct. 575. Appellants complain that the lower court committed fundamental error when it charged that recent possession of stolen goods raises a strong presumption of *340 guilt of the accused.

Commonwealth v. Rok

203 Pa. Super. 280 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1964

Cards, dice, roulette wheels, slot machines, punch boards, certain kinds of boards or tables, lottery tickets, policy slips, ‘numbers’ books and slips are among the common forms of gambling devices and apparatus. … In the case of Connelly v. Weber, 182 Pa.

In Re Laying Out & Opening a Private Road

405 Pa. Super. 298 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1991

Appellants however also correctly note that this court’s standard of review of a Board of Viewers’ findings is very limited. See, e.g., Driver v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Commonwealth, 399 Pa. 156, 158 , 159 A.2d 881, 882 (1960); Peterson v. Pittsburgh Public Parking Authority, 383 Pa. 383, 389 , 119 A.2d 79, 82 (1956); Butler Water Co.

Miller v. Montgomery Borough

39 Pa. Super. 597 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1909

In March v. … Stokes v. Ralpho Twp., 187 Pa. 333 ; Brown v. White, 206 Pa. 106 ; Borough of Easton v. Neff 102 Pa. 474 ; and Merriman v.

Brown, A. v. Kinser B604, LLC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 21, 2016

Appellant v. … KINSER B604, LLC Appellee v.

Saylor v. Greenville Steel Car Co.

157 Pa. Super. 331 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 18, 1945

The board affirmed, and the court entered judgment on the award. … Brown, claimant’s sole medical witness, does not meet the degree of proof necessary to establish a causal connection between the accident and the loss of sight of the eye. Vorbnoff v.

Commonwealth v. Johnson

1999 Pa. Super. 137 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 4, 1999

See e.g., United States v. Brown, 571 F.2d 980, 986 (6th Cir., 1978) (“[T]he right of presence stated in [Rule 43] is more far-reaching than the right of presence protected by the Constitution.”). … Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896), and Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954).

Cochran Et Ux. v. P.C.C. St. L.R.R. Co.

110 Pa. Super. 411 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 25, 1933

Justice Frazer in Giles v. … Brown v. White, 202 Pa. 297 , 51 A. 962 ; Beatty v. Gilmore, 16 Pa. 463 ; Dickson v. Hollister, 123 Pa. 421 , 16 A. 484 .

In re Bond of Equitable Gas Co.

72 Pa. Super. 371 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1919

If the fact were contested, the proof to support it would consist in the production of the minutes of the board showing the action of the directors. … In Turnpike Co. v. Railway Co., 194 Pa. 144 , Mr.

Fetterolf v. Yellow Cab Co. (Et Al.)

139 Pa. Super. 463 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 13, 1939

In Morris v. … In Marach v.

Quinn v. American International Ship Building Corp.

77 Pa. Super. 304 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1921

The Workmen’s Compensation Board holding that the language above quoted had reference to compensation for the loss of the industrial use of an eye disallowed the *306 claim. … Whether we apply to the present case the test used in regard to the loss of the use of a hand in Chovic v. Pittsburgh C. S. Co., 71 Pa.

Grabowski, M. v. Carelink Community

230 A.3d 465 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 9, 2020

Markle v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Caterpillar Tractor Co.), 661 A.2d 1355, 1357 (Pa. 1995). … Pa.R.A.P. 1925(b)(4)(vii) (issues not included in Rule 1925(b) concise statement are waived); Getty v. Getty, 221 A.3d 192, 196 n.5 (Pa. Super. 2019) (same); Brown v. Halpern, 202 A.3d 687, 709 n.13 (Pa.

Greenville Borough v. Guerrini

208 Pa. Super. 42 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1966

Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of Adjustment, 393 Pa. 62 , 141 A. 2d 851 (1958) ; Daly v. Hemphill, 411 Pa. 263 , 191 A. 2d 835 (1963). … This court sustained separate water rates for separate apartment units in Brown v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, 152 Pa.

Livengood v. Stauffer

31 Pa. Super. 495 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 5, 1906

McIlhenny, 4 Watts, 317 ; Huff v. McCauley, 53 Pa. 206 ; Thompson v. McElarney, 82 Pa. 174 ; Harris v. Brown, 202 Pa. 16 . … Wallace, 7 Watts, 394 ; LeFevre v. LeFevre, 4 S. & R. 241; Rerick v. Kern, 14 S. & R. 267; Lewis v. Carstairs, 6 Wharton, 193 ; Swartz v. Swartz, 4 Pa. 353 ; Hill v. Epley, 31 Pa. 361 ; Woods v.

Commonwealth v. Feliciano

2013 Pa. Super. 163 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 2013

Commonwealth v. Brown, 48 A.3d 1275, 1277 (Pa.Super.2012) (citations omitted). In his first issue, Appellant contends that the PCRA court improperly deemed his petition untimely and denied it without a hearing. … Denson, 2013 WL 588509 (W.D.Pa.2013) ("Frye and Lafler do not create 'new' rights, but merely apply existing standards to different factual situations”); Brown v.

Commonwealth v. Madison

263 Pa. Super. 206 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 9, 1979

While the opening in the screen was sufficient to enable a person to enter, the window behind the screen had been boarded up, and there was no evidence that the boarding had been tampered with. … See Commonwealth v. Brown, 226 Pa.Super. 172 , 313 A.2d 290 (1973) (SPAETH, J. dissenting) (vacant house; were tools appropriate to steal copper tubing *217 as alleged?).