Case law

Brown, S. v. Dreixler, T., Jr.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 2018

Appellant cites Lindsey v. Lindsey, 492 A.2d 396 (Pa. … Wise Gas Co. v. Beech Creek Railroad Co., 263 A.2d 313, 315 (Pa. 1970). In Northeast Fence & Iron Works, Inc. v. Murphy Quigley Co., 933 A.2d 664 (Pa.

Pawl Unemployment Compensation Case

194 Pa. Super. 358 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 22, 1961

As we reiterated in Brown Unemployment Compensation Case, 194 Pa. … Superior Ct. 76 , 166 A. 2d 100 , where the decision of the Board is against the party having the burden of proof, the question before the appellate court is whether the Board’s findings of fact are consistent with each other

Commonwealth v. Danysh

2003 Pa. Super. 348 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 17, 2003

See State Board of Dentistry v. Weltman, 168 Pa. Cmwlth. 197, 649 A.2d 478, 479 (1994) (holding court of common pleas lacked subject matter jurisdiction to grant injunction against agency with statewide authority). … Similarly, Commonwealth v. Fleming, 804 A.2d 669 (Pa.Super.2002) does not require a different result.

Brown, N. v. KML Law Group, P.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2019

Suhautsky v. H.H. … Wilkins v. Marsico, 903 A.2d 1281, 1284 (Pa.

Harris v. Pittsburgh Urban Redevelopment Authority

212 Pa. Super. 232 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 13, 1968

The Authority contends that the court below committed error when it stated in the charge to the jury that the proceedings came before the court and jury on “an appeal from the award of the Board of Viewers”. … Brown & Vaughn Development Co. v. Commonwealth, 393 Pa. 589 , 143 A. 2d 815 (1958).

Mazzuco v. Pennsylvania Railroad

122 Pa. Super. 293 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 1936

transportation: Martini v. … Also see Brown v. Lehigh Valley R. R. Co., 121 Pa. Superior Ct. 380 , 184 A. 290 ; Elder v. P. R. R. Co., 118 Pa. Superior Ct. 137 , 180 A. 183 .

Commonwealth v. Eckert

244 Pa. Super. 424 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1976

At the suppression hearing appellant admitted during direct examination that he gave his consent to the search “of the premises hereinafter mentioned” and described as a “Brown and white, 70 x 17 Flamingo House Trailer, 218 … It is undisputed that appellant was not a member of the board, so the prosecutor did not try to mislead the jury as to what evidence was presented to them.

Strine v. York County

57 Pa. Super. 181 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 27, 1914

Opinion by Kephart, J., Viewers were appointed by the court below from the board of viewers constituted under the Act of June 23, 1911, P. … Land was given its technical meaning so as to include a dwelling house: Brocket v. Ohio & Pennsylvania Railroad Co., 14 Pa. 241 . Ground was given the same construction as land: Ferree v.

Commonwealth v. Morris

258 Pa. Super. 24 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 12, 1978

Where would one expect such a robber to board the elevator — at the bottom, where he could wait until a suitable victim boarded, or on another floor, where he would have no control over who might board? … Commonwealth v. Fortune, 464 Pa. 367, 373 , 346 A.2d 783, 786 (1975) (emphasis in original). The simplest example of a “common scheme” is found in Commonwealth v. Brown, 462 Pa. 578 , 342 A.2d 84 (1975).

Chapman v. Faith

18 Pa. Super. 578 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1902

The other cases cited by the appellee’s counsel in support of this rule are: Russell v. Bell, 44 Pa. 47 ; Lee v. Burk, 66 Pa. 336 ; Gray v. Dick, 97 Pa. 143 ; Brown v. Myers et al., 145 Pa. 17 ; Wharton v. … If the case is not within the strict letter of the decision in Young v. Lyman, it is as clearly within the principle decided as was that case. This conclusion is in harmony with our decision in Brown v. Kolb, 8 Pa.

Campbell v. Pittsburg Bridge Co.

23 Pa. Super. 138 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 22, 1903

In Fleming v. … -Justice Brown speaking for the court (p. 71) said: “ The relief tendered was réfused.

Commonwealth v. Vasquez

703 A.2d 25 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 28, 1997

In keeping with the drug interdiction technique involved here, Agent Paret and Trooper Hodges asked the bus driver for permission to examine the tickets of all passengers on board the bus and for permission to board the bus … Agent Paret then opened the backpack and found a small brown paper bag inside a pair of folded blue jeans. The contents of the brown paper bag were readily visible to Agent Paret as it was too small to close completely.

Williams & Co. v. Pittsburgh School District

430 Pa. 509 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 1, 1968

See Commercial Credit Company v. Girard National Bank, 246 Pa. 88 , 92 A. 44 (1914). Tax Review Board v. Elster & Prager, 406 Pa. 543 , 178 A. 2d 611 (1962), heavily relied upon by Taxpayer, is not controlling. … The facts in the instant case are more analagous to Brown & Zortman Machinery Co. v. Pittsburgh, 375 Pa. 250 , 100 A. 2d 98 (1953), and Commonwealth v. Thorne Neale & Co., 264 Pa. 408 , 107 A. 814 (1919).

Commonwealth v. Bennett

2003 Pa. Super. 212 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 30, 2003

of Board members. … Commonwealth v. Brown, 538. Pa. 410, 648 A.2d 1177, 1189 (1994). ¶ 33 It is well settled that the Commonwealth “does not have to establish the sanctity of its exhibits beyond a moral certainty.” Commonwealth v.

Quattrone v. Quattrone

240 Pa. Super. 619 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 28, 1976

Brown v. T.W. Phillips Gas & Oil Co., 365 Pa. 155 , 74 A.2d 105 (1950); Yachere v. Yachere, 52 Pa. D. & C. 2d 768 (C.P. Somerset 1971). In Mechanics’ Bank v. … Similarly, in Brown v. T.W. Phillips Oil & Gas Co., supra, the granting of the discontinuance caused great inconvenience and expense to the defendant.

Beaumont Condominium Assoc. v. Brown, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2017

BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v. … Brown Associates, Inc.

Roth v. Locust Mountain State Hospital

130 Pa. Super. 1 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1937

Superior Ct. 156 , 158 A. 663 ); where the decedent was told to clean the sidewalks of heavy snow and received a severe wetting by slipping and falling into a gutter filled with water (Brown v. Moss, 120 Pa. … Judgment is reversed, and the record is directed to be remitted to the learned court below that judgment may be entered on the findings and conclusions of the board.

Parks v. Miller Printing MacHine Co.

133 Pa. Super. 530 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 27, 1938

Gibson v. Frank Kuhn et al., 105 Pa. … Superior Ct. 156 , 158 A. 663 ) ; where the decedent was told to clean the sidewalks of heavy snow and received a severe wetting by slipping and falling into a gutter filled with water (Brown v. Moss, 120 Pa.

Beaumont Condominium Assoc. v. Brown, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 3, 2017

BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC., CARSON CONCRETE CORP., BEAUMONT CORP., MONTIVUE CONSTRUCTION AND PENNONI ASSOC., INC. APPEAL OF: JEFFREY M. BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC. … BROWN ASSOCIATES, INC., IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellant v.

Commonwealth v. Steinberg

240 Pa. Super. 139 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 22, 1976

Brown, the Authority Chairman at that time. … Compare Commonwealth v. Brown, 116 Pa. Superior Ct. 1 , 175 A. 748 , allocatur refused, 116 Pa.