Case law

Steere's Dairy, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

191 Pa. Super. 301 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 17, 1959

In Flowers by DiAlton’s v. American Insurance Co., 39 N. J. Super. 44, 120 A. 2d 501 , affirmed 42 N. J. … See also Upton v. Travelers Insurance Co., 179 Cal. 727 , 178 P. 851 .

Watson, T. v. Brown, V.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 7, 2025

Jones v. Jones, 878 A.2d 86, 90 (Pa. Super. 2005). … See Maya v. Johnson & Johnson, 97 A.3d 1203, 1211, n. 4 (Pa.

Park v. Pittsburgh School District Board of Public Education

158 Pa. Super. 116 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 26, 1945

In Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company v. … Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Company v. Tamaqua Borough School District, supra.

Commonwealth v. Albert

151 Pa. Super. 184 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 7, 1942

and that there was only one John Brown registered in this district. … Albert admitted that one of the John Brown signatures on the voter’s certificate was not similar to the signature of Brown in the district register.

Brown Unemployment Compensation Case

194 Pa. Super. 76 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1960

Brown was last employed by the Rosenbaum Company, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as a general office clerk, at $58.75 per week. … Brown refused a referral to employment as a general office clerk with the Shell Oil Company, Mt. Lebanon Boulevard, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, at $250.00 per month.

Greer v. Metropolitan Hospital

235 Pa. Super. 266 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 1975

Prior to Ayala and Brown the terms had been used interchangeably. In Conrad v. … Commonwealth Ct. 375 , 316 A.2d 118 (1974) (State Board of Private Academic Schools) ; see Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Bd., 454 Pa. 179 , 301 A.2d 849 (1973) (decided prior to Brown); McCoy v.

Com. v. Brown-Camp, B.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 14, 2025

See also Commonwealth v. … See Commonwealth v.

Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

169 Pa. Super. 124 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 19, 1951

Opinion by Ross, J., In this unemployment compensation case, the base-year employer has appealed from an award of benefits made by the Board of Review. *126 The claimant, Peter Misinkaitis, was last employed by the Eastern … Barclay White Co. v.

H. J. Heinz Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

172 Pa. Super. 324 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 20, 1953

Opinion by Hirt, J., The present four appeals by the defendant employer, from the decisions of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review to the effect that the claimants are not barred from unemployment compensation, … But the Board found that they were eligible for unemployment compensation for succeeding claim weeks. H. J.

American Bag & Paper Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

184 Pa. Super. 292 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 11, 1957

The abuse was such, that though found as a fact by the board, the inspectress refused to repeat it. … The order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is reversed.

Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

188 Pa. Super. 405 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1958

Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 315, 321 , 31 A. 2d 740 (1943) ; Accurti Unemployment Compensation Case, 187 Pa. Superior Ct. 391, 396, 397 , 144 A. 2d 673 (1958). … As in the Hughes case the board here interpreted the Leto Unemployment Compensation Case, supra, 176 Pa.

Com. v. Brown-Rodriguez, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 18, 2025

Appellant’s Brief at V (suggested answer omitted). Initially, we must determine whether the instant appeal is timely. See Commonwealth v. … Commonwealth v.

Brown, M. v. Rumer, J.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 25, 2025

See C.R.F. v. … Habjan v. Habjan, 73 A.3d 630, 637 (Pa.Super. 2013) (quoting Lachat v. Hinchcliffe, 769 A.2d 481, 488 (Pa.Super. 2001)).

Spruce Hill Township School District Board of Directors v. Bryner

148 Pa. Super. 549 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 12, 1941

Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. American Brick & Clay Co. et al., 280 Pa. 449, 452 , 124 A. 650 ; Swick v. Tarentum Borough School District, 141 Pa. Superior Ct. 246 , 14 A. 2d 898 ; Lane’s Appeal, 141 Pa. … See Swick v. School District of the Borough of Tarentum, 344 Pa. 197 , 25 A. 2d 314 .

Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

181 Pa. Super. 515 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 17, 1956

The Board wrote no opinion in this case, but merely adopted the findings and discussion of the Beferee. … The record is remanded to the Board for further consideration and determination consistent with this opinion.

Eastern Gas & Fuel Associates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

164 Pa. Super. 150 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 1948

The board refused, and this we think was error. … Both the board and the Court rejected the claim.

Stanley Manufacturing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

208 Pa. Super. 291 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 15, 1966

On August 20, 1965, the Board of Review affirmed the Referee’s decision on a different ground, namely, that claimant’s unemployment was due to a reduction in the employer’s work force. … Without taking additional testimony, the Board filed a second decision, February 9, 1966, again sustaining the Referee, but solely on the ground that Mrs. Colbert was not guilty of wilful misconduct.

Department of Labor & Industry v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

148 Pa. Super. 246 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 4, 1942

The appeal is sustained and the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is reversed. -

Glen Alden Coal Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

168 Pa. Super. 534 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 10, 1951

On the theory that claimant was “laid off” by appellant the Board awarded benefits. … Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 75 , 30 A. 2d 718 .

Moffitt v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.

80 Pa. Super. 81 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 23, 1922

The first and third points are without merit under Sloan Ship Yards Corporation v. U. S. Shipping Board, 42 Sup. Ct. Rep. 386, and Sullivan v. Shipping Board, 76 Pa. … Plaintiff performed what the defendant required as a condition of earning the leave specified; he was not obliged to remain at work; his doing so was sufficient consideration to fix defendant’s obligation (Potter v.