Case law

Labor & Industry Department v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

133 Pa. Super. 518 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 20, 1938

The department thereupon appealed to the board of review (See section 303 of the general regulations promulgated as rules of procedure by the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review pursuant to the Act, which makes the … We are in general accord with the board in its decision.

Commonwealth v. Commonwealth

297 Pa. Super. 610 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 5, 1982

Kennametal, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

183 Pa. Super. 76 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 28, 1956

Mattey v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 164 Pa. Superior Ct. 36 , 63 A. 2d 429 . Particularly is this so when a work stoppage intervenes between the time of layoff and the time of re-employment. … Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 162 , 106 A. 2d 672 .

Commonwealth v. Felder

324 Pa. Super. 597 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Feb 10, 1984

Mee's Bakery, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 183 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 1, 1947

Superior Ct. 250 , 35 A. 2d 739 ; Barclay White Company v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 356 Pa. 43 , at page 48, 50 A. 2d 336 . … The board’s finding that she desired work at a time to permit her to fulfill her family obligations is supported by the evidence and conclusive. Section 510, Unemployment Compensation Law, supra; Cf. Hall v.

Duquesne Brewing Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

162 Pa. Super. 216 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Nov 17, 1947

The orders of the Board will be reversed. … “It may be between the employees and their Union or bargaining agency, provided it involves the employer and affects the terms or conditions of employment”: Miller v. Unemp. Comp. Board, 152 Pa.

General Electric Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

177 Pa. Super. 49 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 27, 1954

Tbe authority of tbe Golubsld case was limited by our recent decision in Philco v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 2 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 402 , 105 A. 2d 176 . … Claimants are bound by the action of the Union as their agent in negotiating the agreements: Povey v. Midvale Co., 175 Pa. Superior Ct. 395 , 105 A. *58 2d 172 .

Com. v. Brown, A.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 24, 2015

The trial court gave Brown seven days in which to file “a written argument with any law you want to 2 Brady v. Maryland, 83 S.Ct. 1194 (1963). … Commonwealth v. Lambert, 884 A.2d 848, 853 (Pa. 2005). The Brady rule encompasses impeachment evidence. Commonwealth v. Weiss, 81 A.3d 767, 783 (Pa. 2013).

International Furniture Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

185 Pa. Super. 235 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Thereafter the Union filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor *238 Relations Board, which refused to issue a complaint. … See Gerber v. Board of Review, 36 N. J. Super. 322, 115 A. 2d 575 , and cases cited therein. The Referee relied upon Curcio Unemployment Compensation Case, 165 Pa.

Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

165 Pa. Super. 385 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 12, 1949

Lauf v. E. G. Shinner & Co., 303 U. S. 323 , 58 S. Ct. 578 ; Senn v. Tile Layers Protective Union, Local No. 5, 301 U. S. 468 , 57 S. Ct. 857 . … The principle of Miller v. Unemp. Comp. Board, 152 Pa. Superior Ct. 315 , 31 A. 2d 740 , was appropriately invoked in the Loerlem case.

Com. v. Brown, L.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 28, 2015

Commonwealth v. Brown, 71 A.3d 1009, 1011-12 (Pa. Super. 2013) (footnotes omitted). … Commonwealth v. Brown, 77 A.3d 635 (Pa. 2013). The trial court held a sentencing hearing on November 19, 2014.

Com. v. Brown, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 30, 2015

See Commonwealth v. Spotz, 18 A.3d 244, 259 (Pa. 2011). … See Commonwealth v. Koehler, 737 A.2d 225, 238 (Pa. 1999).

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Hall v. Hall

243 Pa. Super. 162 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 27, 1976

Halderman v. Halderman, 230 Pa.Super. 125 , 326 A.2d 908 (1974); Shuster v. Shuster, 226 Pa.Super. 542 , 323 A.2d 760 (1974); Commonwealth v. Testa, 226 Pa.Super. 585 , 323 A.2d 199 (1974). … Id.; Shuster v. Shuster, supra.

Sprague & Henwood, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

207 Pa. Super. 112 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1965

Opinion by Watkins, J., This is an unemployment compensation case in which the employer-appellant, Sprague and Henwood, *114 Inc. appealed from the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review that held a claimant

Arsenal Board of Trade v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

166 Pa. Super. 548 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 11, 1950

As the Supreme Court, quoting Lansdowne Borough Board of Adjustment’s Appeal, 313 Pa. 523, 525 , 170 A. 867 , stated in Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference v. … State Board of Undertakers v. Joseph T. Sekula Funeral Homes, Inc., supra, 339 Pa. 309 , 14 A. 2d 308 ; Pennsylvania Commercial Drivers Conference v.

Lee National Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

206 Pa. Super. 96 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jun 17, 1965

In the present case, the Board made the following significant findings: “19. … V, §510, as amended, 43 P.S. §830, provides that: “. . . the findings of the board or the referee, as the case may be, as to the facts, if supported by the evidence and in the absence of fraud, shall be conclusive . . .”

American Viscose Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

173 Pa. Super. 251 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 14, 1953

The Board’s findings established that claimant countermanded proper orders of management in connection with work assignments in the department in which he was employed, but the Board did not assign willful misconduct to the … The opinions in these cases were filed subsequently to the decision of the Board of Review of March 12, 1952, in the instant case.

Susquehanna Collieries Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

137 Pa. Super. 110 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Apr 24, 1939

Ct. 597 ; Gentile v. Phila. & R. Ry., 274 Pa. 335, 340 , 118 A. 223 ; Knowle’s Est., 295 Pa. 571 , 145 A. 797 ). … The order of the board is reversed and the record is remitted to the board for further action not inconsistent with this opinion.

Com. v. Brown, M.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 18, 2015

Commonwealth v. Watkins, 843 A.2d 1203, 1211 (Pa. 2003) (citing Commonwealth v. Crews, 260 A.2d 771, 771–72 (Pa. 1970)). … Commonwealth v. Harper, 403 A.2d 536, 538–39 (Pa. 1979).

Erie Resistor Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

185 Pa. Super. 240 · Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Jan 21, 1958

Opinion by Woodside, J., This is an appeal by the employer from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review granting compensation to the claimant. … Superior Ct. 242 , 101 A. 2d 132 (1953); Seroskie v. Unemployment Compensation Board, 169 Pa. Superior Ct. 470 , 82 A. 2d 558 (1951); Mikanowicz Unemployment Compensation Case, 178 Pa.