Case law

Application of Rogoff

94 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 14, 1950

In Cooper v. … Henderson v. Tanner & Thompson, 1926, C.D. 37 (Comm, j 1925).

Tepel v. Coleman

229 F. 300 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 15, 1914

About the time the corporation began business it borrowed $10,000 on first mortgage from the Board of Trade of the City of Williamsport. … Co. v. Dilworth Coal Co., 235 Pa. 601 , 84 Atl. 516 .

Retail, Wholesale Department Store Union v. Vaughn's Sanitary Bakery, Inc.

196 F. Supp. 633 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 1961

Defendant relies upon decisions such as Drake Bakeries, Inc. v. Local 50, American Bakery & Confectionary Workers International, AFL-CIO, 2 Cir., 1961, 287 F.2d 155 and Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v. … The Supreme Court, on June 20, 1960, handed down its opinions in United Steelworkers of America v. American Manufacturing Co., 363 U.S. 564 , 80 S.Ct. 1343 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 1403 ; United Steelworkers of America v.

Archibald McNeil & Sons Co. v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.

42 F.2d 669 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jul 29, 1930

Justice Miller, in Pollard v. Vinton, 105 U. S. 7, 8 , 26 L. Ed. 998 , in speaking of the bill of lading, says: *677 ment of the receipt of property on board Ms vessel by the owner of the vessel. … The rule is that a vessel “sails” from the port when she has her cargo on board which she intends to carry, is in complete readiness for the voyage with stores and crew aboard. 26 Cyc. 639; Northland Navigation Co. v.

Rollins v. Edrehi

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 19, 2024

Brown v. Phillip Morris Inc., 250 F.3d 789, 797 (3d Cir. 2001). … See Linskey v. Guariglia, 2012 WL 1268913, at *4 (M.D. Pa. 2012) (considering school board meeting minutes attached to brief in opposition to motion to dismiss). States v.

Little v. Dauphin County

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Sep 29, 2025

Brown v. Astrue, 649 F.3d 193, 195 (3d Cir. 2011) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)). … Judge Latella recommended the Court deny dismissal of this claim because Plaintiffs sufficiently allege that the Dauphin County Jail Oversite Board (the “Oversite Board”) had knowledge of and acquiescence to the relevant

Wexco Inc. v. IMC, INC.

820 F. Supp. 194 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 16, 1993

Dec. 21, 1990) (adopting magistrate’s report & recommendation); Washburn v. Brown, No. 81 C 1475, 1986 WL 7062 at *3 (N.D.Ill. June 17, 1986); American Int'l Group, Inc. v. … Similarly, this court disagrees with Washburn v. Brown, No. 81 C 1475, 1986 WL 7062 at *4 (N.D.Ill.

Blue v. Hiatt

55 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 14, 1944

De Maurez v. Swope, Warden, 9 Cir., 100 F.2d 530 ; Johnson v. Nickozoff et al., 9 Cir., 52 F.2d 1074 . There is, in any event, no merit in the petitioner’s contention. … Falbo v. United States, 320 U.S. 549 , 64 S.Ct. 346 .

Williams v. Corbett

916 F. Supp. 2d 593 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 9, 2012

Third, the Defendants cite Younger v. … See Cnty. of Lancaster v. Phila. Elec. Co., 386 F.Supp. 934, 940 (E.D.Pa. Jan. 3, 1975); Nw. Sch. Dist. v. Pittenger, 397 F.Supp. 975, 979-80 (W.D.Pa.975) (same); see also Pocono Mt. Charter Sch. v. Pocono Mt. Sch.

Pennsylvania v. Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority

423 F. Supp. 2d 472 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 21, 2006

See Mariana v. Fisher, 338 F.3d 189, 198 (3d Cir.2003) (citing Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943)). 7 The origin of this doctrine is the Supreme Court’s decision in Parker v. … Auth. v.

Padgett v. Stein

406 F. Supp. 287 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Dec 16, 1975

Wilkerson v. … In the performance of their duties on the prison board, the county judges are not acting within the scope of their judicial jurisdiction.

Eckles v. United States

471 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 6, 1979

See United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141 , 99 L.Ed. 139 (1954); Camassar v. United States, 400 F.Supp. 894 (D.Conn. 1975). … Brown, supra), and United States v. Hainline, 315 F.2d 153 (10th Cir. 1963), cert. denied 375 U.S. 895 , 84 S.Ct. 172 , 11 L.Ed.2d 124 (1963) is misplaced.

McFadden v. Lehman

968 F. Supp. 1001 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · May 23, 1997

Neitzke v. … Mark, 823 F.Supp. 288, 294 (E.D.Pa.1993); Wright v. Cuyler, 517 F.Supp. 637, 641-42 (E.D.Pa.1981); King v. Board of Probation & Parole, 111 Pa.Cmwlth. 392 , 534 A.2d 150, 152-53 (1987).

Pennsylvania ex rel. Schnader v. Fix

7 F. Supp. 729 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Aug 2, 1934

Dodge v. Brady, 246 U. S. 122 , 30 S. Ct. 277 , 60 L. Ed. 560 ; Miller, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Standard Nut Margarine Co. of Florida, 284 U. S. 498 , 52 S. Ct. 260 , 76 L. Ed. 422 ; Hill v. Wallace, 269 U. … See, also, Dodge v. Osborn, 240 U. S. 118 , 36 S. Ct. 275 , 60 L. Ed. 557 .

Woodmansee v. Miller

619 F. Supp. 28 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 11, 1985

See 18 U.S.C. § 4214 ; Campbell v. United States Parole Commission, 704 F.2d 106, 109-110 (3d Cir. 1983). … Petitioner submitted to this court a copy of the denial of his appeal to the National Appeals Board. Thus, petitioner did exhaust his administrative remedies.

Adzenoska v. Erie R.

210 F. 571 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 6, 1914

By distinguishing this case in Galveston, etc., Railway Co. v. Gonzales, 151 U. S. 496 , 14 Sup. Ct. 401, 38 L. Ed. 248 , Mr. … Justice Brown said: “In the Hohorst Case it was held that the clause in question, that no cavil suit ^should be brought against any person in any other district than that whereof he was an inhabitant, was manifestly inapplicable

Smoker v. Russell

218 F. Supp. 899 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 27, 1963

Giovengo v. Maroney, D.C. … Giovengo v. Maroney, supra, and I am in full accord therewith. No purpose would be sexwed by repeating them here.

Teitelbaum v. Scranton National Bank

384 F. Supp. 1139 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Nov 7, 1974

. § 78g, and Regulation U of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, 12 C. F.R. § 221. … Landry v. Hemphill, Noyes & Co., 473 F.2d 365, 370 (1st Cir. 1973); Pearlstein v. Scudder & German, 429 F.2d 1136, 1140 (2d Cir. 1970); Goldenberg v. Bache & Co., 270 F.2d 675, 680 (5th Cir. 1959); Livingston v.

Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local 764 v. Greenawalt

880 F. Supp. 1076 · District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Mar 24, 1995

There was no mention of the cash transaction in the Executive Board minutes, nor was it ever approved by the Executive Board or the membership at large. … Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v.

Moy v. DeParlos

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 16, 2022

Williams v. … See Brown, 903 F.2d at 278. This precludes a finding that Dr. Keenan acted with the “obduracy and wantonness” necessary to prove an Eighth Amendment violation. See Whitley v Algers, 475 U.S. 312, 319 (1986). Dr.